2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Official Procharger Build Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 09:41 AM
  #1  
chevytech007's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-12-06
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: ridgecrest, ca
Question Official Procharger Build Thread

How many people would be interested in a bolt on procharger c1 kit? I have been talking to a guy at speedmafia.com and we are working on it right now. But im just looking for opinions. If you go to his website you can see the set-up for the 2.2l ion and it looks good. he said they made 190whp on a untuned 2.2L @ 10 psi. But I think It would be awsome to do it on a 2.0l. So, tell me what you think!
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 09:46 AM
  #2  
cobi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-06-06
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Doesnt seem like the conversion would be to bad, how much more efficient is it than the Heaton?
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 09:50 AM
  #3  
chevytech007's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-12-06
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: ridgecrest, ca
You can get specs @ procharger.com but Im not that sure? I will be looking into it more today. But for flow the c1 maxes out @ 24 psi and 1000cfm! So theres a lot of potential.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 09:53 AM
  #4  
cobi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-06-06
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by chevytech007
You can get specs @ procharger.com but Im not that sure? I will be looking into it more today. But for flow the c1 maxes out @ 24 psi and 1000cfm! So theres a lot of potential.
yikes, bring on the supporting mods
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 09:54 AM
  #5  
Jackalope's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 1
From: here
If a 2.2 made 190 whp then your 2.0 would probly make less. Seems to me this needs to be worked on a tad more for it to be something worthwhile.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 09:56 AM
  #6  
Destructo26's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 04-03-06
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: K/W, Ontario
I'd like to put one on my go cart.

pwn you all! muhahaha..
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 09:56 AM
  #7  
cobi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-06-06
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by Jackalope
If a 2.2 made 190 whp then your 2.0 would probly make less. Seems to me this needs to be worked on a tad more for it to be something worthwhile.
why do you say that the 2.0 would make less?
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 09:58 AM
  #8  
RaineMan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-02-05
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake, UT
Originally Posted by Jackalope
If a 2.2 made 190 whp then your 2.0 would probly make less. Seems to me this needs to be worked on a tad more for it to be something worthwhile.

Say what now? The 2.0 can handle twice the boost that a 2.2 can.

Though I don't see the advantages of it over the Eaton unit. If you're gonna go through all the trouble to ditch the SC... why do it in favor of another SC? Just go turbo.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:02 AM
  #9  
Jackalope's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 1
From: here
No no guys you mis understand why I said that. Not that the 2.0 can't handle more cause we all know it can but if they put the SAME amount of boost into your 2.0's that they did the 2.2 then yes it would make less power. The whole displacement thing guys.

True they could pump up the boost for the 2.0 and make gobs more power but I was refering to the 10psi part.

Not hating on your 2.0's guys really.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:06 AM
  #10  
RaineMan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-02-05
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake, UT
Ah... I see your meaning. Though I wager that the 2.0 at 10PSI can make more power than the 2.2 simply b/c we can tune for the boost.

I will restate that I have yet to see a boosted LS/LT that's held together for more than a week.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:08 AM
  #11  
WhiteSSBalt's Avatar
Not a Sebring
 
Joined: 02-22-07
Posts: 12,863
Likes: 2
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Jackalope
No no guys you mis understand why I said that. Not that the 2.0 can't handle more cause we all know it can but if they put the SAME amount of boost into your 2.0's that they did the 2.2 then yes it would make less power. The whole displacement thing guys.

True they could pump up the boost for the 2.0 and make gobs more power but I was refering to the 10psi part.

Not hating on your 2.0's guys really.
true. Just b/c your engine is set up more correctly for boost, dosen't mean that the 2.2/2.4 wouldn't make more power if they were running the same psi. I'm going with Jackalope on this. That whole "theres no replacement for displacement" phrase comes into play here........
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:13 AM
  #12  
Jackalope's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 1
From: here
Rainman, tuning does help BIGTIME! doesn't it?
WhiteSS, thanks for getting my meaning.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:18 AM
  #13  
R&C_rallySS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-09-06
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
From: PA
I think this would be an awesome set up for a 2.2 or 2.4.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:28 AM
  #14  
bc3tech's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-21-06
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by RaineMan
Say what now? The 2.0 can handle twice the boost that a 2.2 can.

Though I don't see the advantages of it over the Eaton unit. If you're gonna go through all the trouble to ditch the SC... why do it in favor of another SC? Just go turbo.
procharger SC runs TONS cooler than a roots.
Originally Posted by R&C_rallySS
I think this would be an awesome set up for a 2.2 or 2.4.
2.4 FTW... displacement, internals, AND tuning!!!!!!

Originally Posted by RaineMan
Ah... I see your meaning. Though I wager that the 2.0 at 10PSI can make more power than the 2.2 simply b/c we can tune for the boost.

I will restate that I have yet to see a boosted LS/LT that's held together for more than a week.
somebody hasn't been paying attention... the 190whp was ME.... 4000mi+ on my procharger setup.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:32 AM
  #15  
Edubs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-01-06
Posts: 4,976
Likes: 2
From: West Coast, FL
I have thought about this in the past also and looked at the C1. Sure it will be more efficient than the Roots, but at what it will cost, a turbo is more efficient and will probably cost the same.

You guys forget the head on the LSJ should offer more power than the L61 and LE5. I'd go out on a limb and say the 2.0 will make just as much power as a 2.2, if not more. The 2.4 is a different story due to VVT. That powerband would be sick!

EDIT: Actually, I'll guarantee it. Thinking about it now. If the C1 is more efficient than the roots than it should make a lot more power! Seeing as the Roots makes apprx 200WHP at 12psi on the LSJ, at 10psi on a more efficient blower, it should make just as much, if not more power than a stock LSJ...
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 10:56 AM
  #16  
monkeiboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-30-06
Posts: 3,505
Likes: 0
From: West Memphis, AR
Originally Posted by R&C_rallySS
I think this would be an awesome set up for a 2.2 or 2.4.
Exxxxxcellent
Procharger for the 2.4l....yes...good....
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 11:01 AM
  #17  
pimpnwink's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-17-06
Posts: 3,697
Likes: 0
From: New York
ill wait and see what happens becuase im still trying to decide which way to go. But i have to see some numbers first.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 11:11 AM
  #18  
blown06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-06-06
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Central IL
and you can have a bov lol
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 11:15 AM
  #19  
artawesome's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-22-05
Posts: 2,819
Likes: 0
From: newport news.VA
i just like to see more options out there for ALL of our cars!
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 11:19 AM
  #20  
Edubs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-01-06
Posts: 4,976
Likes: 2
From: West Coast, FL
Originally Posted by artawesome
i just like to see more options out there for ALL of our cars!
X100
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 11:23 AM
  #21  
chevytech007's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-12-06
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: ridgecrest, ca
I think you would love the procharger. No oil lines to run. No turbocharger heat. No exhaust work. your intercooler is still going to be used. And it sound awsome!!! The supercharger can support up to 650 ish horsepower so it can grow with you and your mods. So you duel pass setup and front mount coolers are still used(no money wasted).
also its going to be so much easier to install then the turbo and make more power. Im shooting for 18 psi.

And the 2.0l will make more power due to the fact that the intake manifold will hold boost! ha ha ha
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 11:29 AM
  #22  
Jackalope's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 1
From: here
Originally Posted by chevytech007
And the 2.0l will make more power due to the fact that the intake manifold will hold boost! ha ha ha
Oh God.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 11:30 AM
  #23  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
i could talk to a couple of techs at ATI/Procharger themselves and see what the word is. if they would be interested in making a kit
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 11:32 AM
  #24  
artawesome's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-22-05
Posts: 2,819
Likes: 0
From: newport news.VA
Originally Posted by chevytech007
I think you would love the procharger. No oil lines to run. No turbocharger heat. No exhaust work. your intercooler is still going to be used. And it sound awsome!!! The supercharger can support up to 650 ish horsepower so it can grow with you and your mods. So you duel pass setup and front mount coolers are still used(no money wasted).
also its going to be so much easier to install then the turbo and make more power. Im shooting for 18 psi.

And the 2.0l will make more power due to the fact that the intake manifold will hold boost! ha ha ha
are you talking our supercharger that we have on our 'bolts? or other supercharger out there?
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 01:25 PM
  #25  
blown06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-06-06
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Central IL
if i had the money i would convert to a procharger in a heart beat
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:51 PM.