Official Procharger Build Thread
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 06-12-06
Location: ridgecrest, ca
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Official Procharger Build Thread
How many people would be interested in a bolt on procharger c1 kit? I have been talking to a guy at speedmafia.com and we are working on it right now. But im just looking for opinions. If you go to his website you can see the set-up for the 2.2l ion and it looks good. he said they made 190whp on a untuned 2.2L @ 10 psi. But I think It would be awsome to do it on a 2.0l. So, tell me what you think!
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 06-12-06
Location: ridgecrest, ca
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can get specs @ procharger.com but Im not that sure? I will be looking into it more today. But for flow the c1 maxes out @ 24 psi and 1000cfm! So theres a lot of potential.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-06-06
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-06-06
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-02-05
Location: Salt Lake, UT
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Say what now? The 2.0 can handle twice the boost that a 2.2 can.
Though I don't see the advantages of it over the Eaton unit. If you're gonna go through all the trouble to ditch the SC... why do it in favor of another SC? Just go turbo.
#9
No no guys you mis understand why I said that. Not that the 2.0 can't handle more cause we all know it can but if they put the SAME amount of boost into your 2.0's that they did the 2.2 then yes it would make less power. The whole displacement thing guys.
True they could pump up the boost for the 2.0 and make gobs more power but I was refering to the 10psi part.
Not hating on your 2.0's guys really.
True they could pump up the boost for the 2.0 and make gobs more power but I was refering to the 10psi part.
Not hating on your 2.0's guys really.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-02-05
Location: Salt Lake, UT
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ah... I see your meaning. Though I wager that the 2.0 at 10PSI can make more power than the 2.2 simply b/c we can tune for the boost.
I will restate that I have yet to see a boosted LS/LT that's held together for more than a week.
I will restate that I have yet to see a boosted LS/LT that's held together for more than a week.
#11
Not a Sebring
No no guys you mis understand why I said that. Not that the 2.0 can't handle more cause we all know it can but if they put the SAME amount of boost into your 2.0's that they did the 2.2 then yes it would make less power. The whole displacement thing guys.
True they could pump up the boost for the 2.0 and make gobs more power but I was refering to the 10psi part.
Not hating on your 2.0's guys really.
True they could pump up the boost for the 2.0 and make gobs more power but I was refering to the 10psi part.
Not hating on your 2.0's guys really.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-21-06
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2.4 FTW... displacement, internals, AND tuning!!!!!!
somebody hasn't been paying attention... the 190whp was ME.... 4000mi+ on my procharger setup.
#15
Senior Member
I have thought about this in the past also and looked at the C1. Sure it will be more efficient than the Roots, but at what it will cost, a turbo is more efficient and will probably cost the same.
You guys forget the head on the LSJ should offer more power than the L61 and LE5. I'd go out on a limb and say the 2.0 will make just as much power as a 2.2, if not more. The 2.4 is a different story due to VVT. That powerband would be sick!
EDIT: Actually, I'll guarantee it. Thinking about it now. If the C1 is more efficient than the roots than it should make a lot more power! Seeing as the Roots makes apprx 200WHP at 12psi on the LSJ, at 10psi on a more efficient blower, it should make just as much, if not more power than a stock LSJ...
You guys forget the head on the LSJ should offer more power than the L61 and LE5. I'd go out on a limb and say the 2.0 will make just as much power as a 2.2, if not more. The 2.4 is a different story due to VVT. That powerband would be sick!
EDIT: Actually, I'll guarantee it. Thinking about it now. If the C1 is more efficient than the roots than it should make a lot more power! Seeing as the Roots makes apprx 200WHP at 12psi on the LSJ, at 10psi on a more efficient blower, it should make just as much, if not more power than a stock LSJ...
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 06-12-06
Location: ridgecrest, ca
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think you would love the procharger. No oil lines to run. No turbocharger heat. No exhaust work. your intercooler is still going to be used. And it sound awsome!!! The supercharger can support up to 650 ish horsepower so it can grow with you and your mods. So you duel pass setup and front mount coolers are still used(no money wasted).
also its going to be so much easier to install then the turbo and make more power. Im shooting for 18 psi.
And the 2.0l will make more power due to the fact that the intake manifold will hold boost! ha ha ha
also its going to be so much easier to install then the turbo and make more power. Im shooting for 18 psi.
And the 2.0l will make more power due to the fact that the intake manifold will hold boost! ha ha ha
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: 12-22-05
Location: newport news.VA
Posts: 2,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think you would love the procharger. No oil lines to run. No turbocharger heat. No exhaust work. your intercooler is still going to be used. And it sound awsome!!! The supercharger can support up to 650 ish horsepower so it can grow with you and your mods. So you duel pass setup and front mount coolers are still used(no money wasted).
also its going to be so much easier to install then the turbo and make more power. Im shooting for 18 psi.
And the 2.0l will make more power due to the fact that the intake manifold will hold boost! ha ha ha
also its going to be so much easier to install then the turbo and make more power. Im shooting for 18 psi.
And the 2.0l will make more power due to the fact that the intake manifold will hold boost! ha ha ha