2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Official Turbo LSJ thread!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-09-2013, 10:14 AM
  #6376  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Killa SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-12-06
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SylverSS/SC
You need an lnf thermostat housing?
Water cooled turbo. Lnf housing has tap for feed or return line for turbo I believe
Old 08-09-2013, 10:16 AM
  #6377  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
SylverSS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-07-08
Location: Calgary,Alberta
Posts: 5,131
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm just getting a better manifold like zzp's or RDFABS so you don't have to swap coolant pipes. Plus you have a lot more turbos available for you to upgrade to
Old 08-09-2013, 10:17 AM
  #6378  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
SylverSS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-07-08
Location: Calgary,Alberta
Posts: 5,131
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Just seen the post about coolant lines on the thermostat housing. I didn't know they had the line in the housing
Old 08-09-2013, 10:20 AM
  #6379  
New Member
 
Rockford_Redline's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-12
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@jonathon923. All of the research I have done has pointed to the spool rate of the K04 being the cause of blown pistons on the lsj.
Old 08-09-2013, 10:35 AM
  #6380  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
armcclure's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,894
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Killa SS
Whats the best way to go about tuning around the maf for more fuel and air. Mini afc. 3in maf tube or 4in maf tube?
If you're going past the maf table hz, a mini-afc or maf-T or larger tube will give you similar results.
If you can find one for a good price I'd try a mini-afc first. That way you keep airspeed up for a more stable idle even though you're losing some resolution.
Old 08-09-2013, 11:02 AM
  #6381  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
mrbelvedere's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-03-05
Location: KY
Posts: 8,165
Received 51 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by armcclure
Bullshit. I know you're gonna get all mad because you're just as bullheaded as I am, but I don't care.

That entire text you copied from howstuffworks was for a CLOSED SYSTEM. Which is NOT what an lsj has. So sorry, you're incorrect.

You should have gone a couple links lower on google and you would have found this, which is how ours works:


The PCV valve is only one part of the PCV system, which is essentially a variable and calibrated air leak, whereby the engine returns its crankcase combustion gases to the air intake. Instead of the gases being vented to the atmosphere, gases are fed back into the intake manifold, to re-enter the combustion chamber as part of a fresh charge of air and fuel. The PCV system is not a classical "vacuum leak". All the air collected by the air cleaner (and metered by the mass flow sensor, on a fuel injected engine) goes through the intake manifold. The PCV system just diverts a small percentage of this air via the breather to the crankcase before allowing it to be drawn back into the intake tract again. It is an "open system" in that fresh exterior air is continuously used to flush contaminants from the crankcase and into the combustion chamber.

The system relies on the fact that, while the engine is running under light load and moderate throttle opening, the intake manifold's air pressure is always less than crankcase air pressure (see manifold vacuum). The lower pressure of the intake manifold draws air towards it, pulling air from the breather through the crankcase (where it dilutes and mixes with combustion gases), through the PCV valve, and into the intake manifold.

The PCV system usually consists of the 'breather tube' and the 'PCV valve'. The breather tube connects the crankcase to a clean source of fresh air—the air cleaner body. Usually, clean air from the air filter flows into this tube and into the engine after passing through a screen, baffle, or other simple system to arrest a flame front, to prevent a potentially explosive atmosphere within the engine crank case from being ignited from a back-fire into the intake manifold. The baffle, filter, or screen also traps oil mist, and keeps it inside the engine.

Once inside the engine, the air circulates around the interior of the engine, picking up and clearing away combustion byproduct gases, including a large amount of water vapor which includes dissolved chemical combustion byproducts, then exits through another simple baffle, screen, or mesh to trap oil droplets before being drawn out through the PCV valve, and into the intake manifold.
On some PCV systems, this oil baffling takes place in a discrete replaceable part called the 'oil separator'.
still wrong
Old 08-09-2013, 11:11 AM
  #6382  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
armcclure's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,894
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere

still wrong
Please tell me how
Old 08-09-2013, 11:57 AM
  #6383  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
SylverSS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-07-08
Location: Calgary,Alberta
Posts: 5,131
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Because ....... Wait for it.......... STX GMSS DAWG! Lol
Old 08-09-2013, 12:07 PM
  #6384  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
c130aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-19-07
Location: LR, AR
Posts: 3,836
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Killa SS
Whats the best way to go about tuning around the maf for more fuel and air. Mini afc. 3in maf tube or 4in maf tube?
I have a 3" MAF and it ran out around 20 something PSI with a boost spike of 24 on a 20g now that is a lower CFM than probably some of the Precision turbos that others are running so that 3" is a bad idea in my option but its one you listed above in the quote. Unless you are on a 20g ( I am doing fine with my 3" MAF tube at 24 psi/440whp). I would recommend going to a 3.5 as I believe some have done here.

As for tuning you really need to have someone that is a very trusted tuner. You car is only going to be as good as the person tuning it. My tuner and I (I gave him the research I had done on HPT forums for our cars) made the power enrich table richer at higher rpm.
You command more fuel by enriching the PE(eq) table. It takes this value and divides it by commanded AFR. So you can simply tune around it without screwing with the MAF freq table. That PE table is can be a pain in the butt; however, it can also make your dreams come true.

Originally Posted by Rockford_Redline
@jonathon923. All of the research I have done has pointed to the spool rate of the K04 being the cause of blown pistons on the lsj.
The spool rate causing blown pistons? I am sorry man, not trying to be a jerk but that shows you need to do more research and not just take what people on here say for factual information. Its detonation and bad tuning that ruins pistons, not turbo lag.
Old 08-09-2013, 02:51 PM
  #6385  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
c130aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-19-07
Location: LR, AR
Posts: 3,836
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by VeNoM0713
so i had john powell help me out with my pcv system that i bought from him (trying to get it to work with my LSJ) and i asked him a question that he suggested i ask you. i have the hahn stage 5 turbo kit and im burning oil. not alot and it doesnt happen all the time ie: if i were to have bad rings, etc. john told me that i should have a restrictor in the oil feed line? he said that you had the same problem and you installed one.. i coulda swore i read that we didnt need restrictors since we have journal bearing turbos. anyways, i thought my turbo seals are gone so i purchased a rebuild kit.. now im not sure if thats the problem lol. did you buy the whole kit from hahn or did you just buy the s20g from them? also, ******* awesome numbers man. all ive wanted is to hit 400whp and i would be happy lol.
The restrictor for Hahn turbos are .06/1.5mm with a thread M12x1.5mm and a - 4 AN fitting on the other end. Hahn sells them and they are available on ebay. It cures the light oil around the BOV and smoking on decel. 5 bucks and it cures what ails ya.

I answered your other stuff in the PM's.
Old 08-09-2013, 07:27 PM
  #6386  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-05
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 12,485
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 60 Posts
Originally Posted by c130aviator
I have a 3" MAF and it ran out around 20 something PSI with a boost spike of 24 on a 20g now that is a lower CFM than probably some of the Precision turbos that others are running so that 3" is a bad idea in my option but its one you listed above in the quote. Unless you are on a 20g ( I am doing fine with my 3" MAF tube at 24 psi/440whp). I would recommend going to a 3.5 as I believe some have done here.

As for tuning you really need to have someone that is a very trusted tuner. You car is only going to be as good as the person tuning it. My tuner and I (I gave him the research I had done on HPT forums for our cars) made the power enrich table richer at higher rpm.
You command more fuel by enriching the PE(eq) table. It takes this value and divides it by commanded AFR. So you can simply tune around it without screwing with the MAF freq table. That PE table is can be a pain in the butt; however, it can also make your dreams come true.
More people need to understand this, if you get your MAF dialed in, the rest of the fueling is very simple to adjust. It takes time and patience to get a good, accurate MAF tune, especially on a very heavily modded car (like a turbo swap), but once it's there, you can very simply adjust your target a/f in any range and they will be surprisingly accurate.
Old 08-09-2013, 08:41 PM
  #6387  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Killa SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-12-06
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone have the tables for the ID1000s for my tuner. He doesn't understand the tables ID provides on there page
Old 08-09-2013, 08:42 PM
  #6388  
Premium Member
 
jonnymerk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-29-06
Location: Lakeland
Posts: 1,624
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Got my car back finally. Went in for a turbo swap on Feb. Engine gave out on the dyno. Thousands of dollars and nearly 6 months later. Mechanic felt the turbo was burning oil. Since I've picked up the car I have not seen any smoke so Im hoping the seals set in..It is a used precission 5857 but I had it rebuilt at theBoostlab. Driving it on no meth and no boost controller and taking it ez for 200-300 miles. Hopefully go full boost and tune if all looks well after break in.
Old 08-09-2013, 09:26 PM
  #6389  
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
noorj's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-10
Location: motor city
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by armcclure
Please stop calling the intake tube breather a 2nd vac source. That is not what it is, and calling it as such is the source of 90% of the confusion about the stock lsj pcv system.
Oh sorry "a second place to get only vacuum that is metered"

lol better?
Old 08-09-2013, 09:46 PM
  #6390  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
armcclure's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,894
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Killa SS
Anyone have the tables for the ID1000s for my tuner. He doesn't understand the tables ID provides on there page
I sent them to you in a pm...





Originally Posted by noorjariri

Oh sorry "a second place to get only vacuum that is metered"

lol better?
No, it's a fresh air inlet.
Old 08-09-2013, 10:07 PM
  #6391  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
c130aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-19-07
Location: LR, AR
Posts: 3,836
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by ItalianJoe1
More people need to understand this, if you get your MAF dialed in, the rest of the fueling is very simple to adjust. It takes time and patience to get a good, accurate MAF tune, especially on a very heavily modded car (like a turbo swap), but once it's there, you can very simply adjust your target a/f in any range and they will be surprisingly accurate.
Yeah i have been saying that since I started screwing with the tune this year, then watched in Feb as my tuner just screwed with the PE after he had the car for a day driving it around and getting MAF freq and ST/LT fuel trims dialed in. After that it was just fun on the dyno until we got the car to 11.9 AFR (gas AFR) on E85. Only took 7 pulls and didnt even need that many, were playing with boost to see when the fuel system started to lean out. I later got a BRFPS and went as high as 472whp at 27psi with nothing more than screwing with the PE table.
Old 08-09-2013, 10:49 PM
  #6392  
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
noorj's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-10
Location: motor city
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by armcclure
No, it's a fresh air inlet.
Maybe if you read what we were talking about you would understand, oh well.
Old 08-09-2013, 11:01 PM
  #6393  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
armcclure's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,894
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by noorjariri

Maybe if you read what we were talking about you would understand, oh well.
You called it a metered vac source. Which in pcv terms, is absolutely 100% incorrect.

What you all are talking about, is trying to improve on a system that you don't even understand to begin with.

To those of you putting huge/multiple holes in your vc and running gigantic lines to the intake tube: guess what? You've effectively cut your crank case vac to a piddly fraction of what even the stock system provided.

This is something so basic and fundamental that I really can't comprehend why so many of you don't get it.
Old 08-09-2013, 11:14 PM
  #6394  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
c130aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-19-07
Location: LR, AR
Posts: 3,836
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I dont get what your saying true.

But what I do get is after 2 months of pulls and daily driving is a 150ml of partially condensed water vapor, oil, and burned off gases that dont stay in my engine block. Especially with e85 you have a high content of water vapor. If that crap condensed in the block it could mix with oil and spin rod bearings, ruin the brass journals in my turbo, etc.

six of one, half dozen of the other...
Old 08-09-2013, 11:38 PM
  #6395  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
armcclure's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,894
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by c130aviator
I dont get what your saying true.

But what I do get is after 2 months of pulls and daily driving is a 150ml of partially condensed water vapor, oil, and burned off gases that dont stay in my engine block. Especially with e85 you have a high content of water vapor. If that crap condensed in the block it could mix with oil and spin rod bearings, ruin the brass journals in my turbo, etc.

six of one, half dozen of the other...
That's great. All I'm trying to do is help make it even better. But I can't do that if you (not you personally, just anyone reading) don't understand the basic function of the system as it was designed.
I spent a half hour on the phone with Powell today talking about this very subject. We're going to try to come up with a better solution for you blow through guys, since FAI post maf is out of the question without a maze of check valves, or running a seperate air pump. Or if you don't care about the headache of tuning around a vac leak that you created.
Old 08-09-2013, 11:47 PM
  #6396  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Killa SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-12-06
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by armcclure
I sent them to you in a pm...

No, it's a fresh air inlet.
I got them. He says thats not what he needs :/ I need some one who knows what there doing
Old 08-09-2013, 11:50 PM
  #6397  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
c130aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-19-07
Location: LR, AR
Posts: 3,836
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
The way mine is rigged is actually 95 percent what the stock system did on my LSJ. That is why I feel good about it and why I and many others are wondering what the heck you are talking about. (said in sarcasm and with a polite smile as to not offend you)

Let me show you what I mean. (six half dozen...)

I pulled the stock AOS out of the head and remvoed the backfire/flame arrestor yes... my VAC source is just above the stock location, it runs from there to the intake before my turbo (boost source) with a catch can in between. Its always in vacuum, less at low boost (low rpm) more at full WOT.

Stock cars have baffles in place and arrestor installed... their VAC source is at the rear of the VC, it runs from there to the intake before the supercharger (boost source). Its always in vacuum, less at low boost (low rpm) more at full WOT.

My head vac source is pretty much stock configuration with a sheetmetal intake manifold. It functions as stock does.
Old 08-10-2013, 01:47 AM
  #6398  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Killa SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-12-06
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by c130aviator
The way mine is rigged is actually 95 percent what the stock system did on my LSJ. That is why I feel good about it and why I and many others are wondering what the heck you are talking about. (said in sarcasm and with a polite smile as to not offend you)

Let me show you what I mean. (six half dozen...)

I pulled the stock AOS out of the head and remvoed the backfire/flame arrestor yes... my VAC source is just above the stock location, it runs from there to the intake before my turbo (boost source) with a catch can in between. Its always in vacuum, less at low boost (low rpm) more at full WOT.

Stock cars have baffles in place and arrestor installed... their VAC source is at the rear of the VC, it runs from there to the intake before the supercharger (boost source). Its always in vacuum, less at low boost (low rpm) more at full WOT.

My head vac source is pretty much stock configuration with a sheetmetal intake manifold. It functions as stock does.
Same. Using a morso oil air separator
Old 08-10-2013, 09:23 AM
  #6399  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
armcclure's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,894
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Killa SS

I got them. He says thats not what he needs :/ I need some one who knows what there doing
Um.. What? I worked directly with Paul Yaw from ID to come up with those tables. They're exactly what you need.
Old 08-10-2013, 09:27 AM
  #6400  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
armcclure's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,894
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by c130aviator
The way mine is rigged is actually 95 percent what the stock system did on my LSJ. That is why I feel good about it and why I and many others are wondering what the heck you are talking about. (said in sarcasm and with a polite smile as to not offend you)

Let me show you what I mean. (six half dozen...)

I pulled the stock AOS out of the head and remvoed the backfire/flame arrestor yes... my VAC source is just above the stock location, it runs from there to the intake before my turbo (boost source) with a catch can in between. Its always in vacuum, less at low boost (low rpm) more at full WOT.

Stock cars have baffles in place and arrestor installed... their VAC source is at the rear of the VC, it runs from there to the intake before the supercharger (boost source). Its always in vacuum, less at low boost (low rpm) more at full WOT.

My head vac source is pretty much stock configuration with a sheetmetal intake manifold. It functions as stock does.
So the head port functions just like stock? With a check valve in line running from that port to post-tb vac?


Quick Reply: Official Turbo LSJ thread!!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 PM.