2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Piping size

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2010 | 01:47 PM
  #1  
dougyfresh's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 09-24-08
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: VA
Piping size

I am going to be turboing my lsj soon and just wondering what size piping would be the best?
Im gonna have

s256et
ported and polished head
darton sleeves
diamond pistons
78lbs valve springs
and all the turbo bolt ons....

Any recommendations?
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2010 | 01:48 PM
  #2  
BLAZIN07SS's Avatar
I'm too JDM for you
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 06-05-07
Posts: 16,357
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Florida
2.5 inch hot side. 3 inch cold side
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2010 | 01:56 PM
  #3  
Omega_5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Everything 2.5".
Only use a 3" MAF section if your MAF is shitting itself due to max frequency.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2010 | 01:57 PM
  #4  
mkulrey13's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: 08-30-05
Posts: 18,509
Likes: 5
From: New Hampshire
2.5 is the norm.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2010 | 02:00 PM
  #5  
BLAZIN07SS's Avatar
I'm too JDM for you
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 06-05-07
Posts: 16,357
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Florida
Originally Posted by Omega_5
Everything 2.5".
Only use a 3" MAF section if your MAF is shitting itself due to max frequency.
you need a full 3 inch cold side. if you only use a 3 inch maf section it will cause turbulence over the MAF and skew readings
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2010 | 02:09 PM
  #6  
Omega_5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Originally Posted by BLAZIN07SS
you need a full 3 inch cold side. if you only use a 3 inch maf section it will cause turbulence over the MAF and skew readings
Nope. Just a MAF section.
To take out any turbulence a MAF must; be placed at least 6-10 inches after any neck or bend, and 4-6 inches before any neck or bend.
ie; you only need a clean 10-16 inches of 3" pipe to have the MAF work properly.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2010 | 02:11 PM
  #7  
BLAZIN07SS's Avatar
I'm too JDM for you
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 06-05-07
Posts: 16,357
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Florida
Originally Posted by Omega_5
Nope. Just a MAF section.
To take out any turbulence a MAF must; be placed at least 6-10 inches after any neck or bend, and 4-6 inches before any neck or bend.
ie; you only need a clean 10-16 inches of 3" pipe to have the MAF work properly.
then why make it difficult and use 2.5 to 3 inch to 2.5? just go straight 3. its not going to make a huge difference in spool time
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2010 | 02:39 PM
  #8  
Omega_5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Originally Posted by BLAZIN07SS
then why make it difficult and use 2.5 to 3 inch to 2.5? just go straight 3. its not going to make a huge difference in spool time
Because going straight 3" is a lot of un-needed volume that which results in a lot of air mass to move, thus slowing spool and charge velocity.

If you are running the pipe through the fender well, where the stock intake goes, you can have over 50" of pipe length from just the IC to the TB.
At 2.5" with a 3" section, that's a volume of 246 cubic inches.
A full 3" would be 353 cubic inches.... that's nearly 50% more mass that has to be accelerated or deccelerated during transient flow.

So, the simple answer is; it's simply un-needed.
Especially when 3" mandrels cost almost double to buy... it's far cheaper to do a 2.5", with a 3" section.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 03:59 PM
  #9  
dougyfresh's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 09-24-08
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: VA
Thanks for the input guys
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 06:20 PM
  #10  
terry11's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 07-24-09
Posts: 1,679
Likes: 0
From: Lewisburg, Pa
That's gay. I just bought a 3'' universal kit and I already had it setup 2.5 - 3 - 2.5

FML

Originally Posted by BLAZIN07SS
then why make it difficult and use 2.5 to 3 inch to 2.5? just go straight 3. its not going to make a huge difference in spool time
How about that base tune man haha I'll have hpt soon I need something to go off of. If you don't wanna do it it's cool.

Last edited by terry11; Jun 9, 2010 at 06:20 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 06:54 PM
  #11  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by BLAZIN07SS
you need a full 3 inch cold side. if you only use a 3 inch maf section it will cause turbulence over the MAF and skew readings
mine is blow through with a 3" maf section only and it works perfect
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 06:57 PM
  #12  
cobaltguy889's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-13-09
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
From: WI
Originally Posted by Omega_5
Because going straight 3" is a lot of un-needed volume that which results in a lot of air mass to move, thus slowing spool and charge velocity.

If you are running the pipe through the fender well, where the stock intake goes, you can have over 50" of pipe length from just the IC to the TB.
At 2.5" with a 3" section, that's a volume of 246 cubic inches.
A full 3" would be 353 cubic inches.... that's nearly 50% more mass that has to be accelerated or deccelerated during transient flow.

So, the simple answer is; it's simply un-needed.
Especially when 3" mandrels cost almost double to buy... it's far cheaper to do a 2.5", with a 3" section.
I agree completely. Just did it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
hacadacalopolis
Parts
8
Oct 28, 2015 06:09 PM
Jesse
Parts
15
Oct 13, 2015 09:32 PM
nathan112i
Featured Car Showcase
41
Sep 30, 2015 07:12 PM
GBRunner24
Featured Car Showcase
3
Sep 26, 2015 06:44 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:42 AM.