2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Ported s/c questions.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 12:55 PM
  #1  
c24na's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-28-05
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: Pitt Meadows, BC
Ported s/c questions.

Hey guys,
has anybody proven that a ported s/c will creat more hp or make this a little more efficient? Decrease/increase in boost/temsp? Any dyno numbers/ track times to support their ported s/c. Also, I plan to do this myself, so post any pics of your ported s/c so we can all see what kind of material was removed.

Thanks,
Nate
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 12:57 PM
  #2  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
no not one person has posted gains as far as hp goes or e.t's but i believe some members got a 15* drop in iat2 temps
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 02:17 PM
  #3  
-Jayson-'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-28-06
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
pls dont do it yourself, pay a professional to do it. Despite what people on here say its really not that easy to do it correctly and properly. yeah any idiot can grab a dremel and take off a bunch of metal, but it takes more than that to do it so it makes proper gains.

Think of it this way, if this mod is so simple to do and makes the blower so much more efficient, why does eaton who im sure has put years of research design and testing into the blower have it the way it is?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 02:21 PM
  #4  
DaREDss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-31-06
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 0
From: O-town
Originally Posted by -Jayson-
pls dont do it yourself, pay a professional to do it. Despite what people on here say its really not that easy to do it correctly and properly. yeah any idiot can grab a dremel and take off a bunch of metal, but it takes more than that to do it so it makes proper gains.

Think of it this way, if this mod is so simple to do and makes the blower so much more efficient, why does eaton who im sure has put years of research design and testing into the blower have it the way it is?
because gm gave them a certain criteria to follow so they made it to the specifications of the 2.0 ecotec just like we bitch stage 2 shoulda came with the car... i know its money issues but if the put so much reseach and development into it why is it so ineffiecient?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 03:04 PM
  #5  
95cobra68camaro's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-23-05
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: NY
i have a few friends and we all ported our blowers, i have a stock pulley and figured id jus try it. I saw no difference but my IAT's are roughly 10-15 degrees cooler.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 03:26 PM
  #6  
WickedSS2005's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 2
From: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
IAT's are cooler by about 10* and my boost went from 18.8 to 17.2. Track times are basically unchanged, throttle response is better (might be in my head?) and whine is louder. According to my aerforce guage I picked up 10hp
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 03:37 PM
  #7  
chevysalesman614's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-03-06
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
Originally Posted by lsjwannabe
no not one person has posted gains as far as hp goes or e.t's but i believe some members got a 15* drop in iat2 temps
i mildly ported my inlet/ outlet and throttle body. mostly just smoothing things out. i didn't go to crazy. and i can't make a claim on IAT2 temps either. but, i did see an AVG. of 4-6 degree drop in coolant temp. from roughly 180*F to about 174*F. so it definitly helps. to what extent IDK.. but it's not as loud (whine).. i think i smoothed the silencer holes too much.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 03:45 PM
  #8  
06blackg85ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-06
Posts: 15,211
Likes: 20
From: New York
yeah I noticed my throttle response is a bit better dropped a few degrees in the IAT2's and it's a bit louder now. but that's about it. dropping in a set of ceramic ballbearing kit on it soon to see if that helps fight some of the parasitic loss
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 03:49 PM
  #9  
chevysalesman614's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-03-06
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
Originally Posted by 06blackg85ss
yeah I noticed my throttle response is a bit better dropped a few degrees in the IAT2's and it's a bit louder now. but that's about it. dropping in a set of ceramic ballbearing kit on it soon to see if that helps fight some of the parasitic loss
My intrest has been peaked. you got a link for me to have a look at the kit?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 03:54 PM
  #10  
DTM2188's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-23-06
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
From: S. Jersey
I've heard mixed answers to this, does porting/polishing the sc increase or decrease boost?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 03:55 PM
  #11  
06blackg85ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-06
Posts: 15,211
Likes: 20
From: New York
I have the site for em, just pics of the ones for the m90's but the guy does m62's also...
http://www.rollingperformance.com/snoutrebuild.htm
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 03:58 PM
  #12  
DaREDss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-31-06
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 0
From: O-town
Originally Posted by DTM2188
I've heard mixed answers to this, does porting/polishing the sc increase or decrease boost?
it makes same power with less boost
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:02 PM
  #13  
DTM2188's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-23-06
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
From: S. Jersey
So potentially then, if I'm boosting 18lbs with a 2.6 pulley and then P/P the SC I would be around 16.5-17lbs on a 2.6?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 04:10 PM
  #14  
chevysalesman614's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-03-06
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
Originally Posted by DTM2188
I've heard mixed answers to this, does porting/polishing the sc increase or decrease boost?
decrease. you're making the area holding the air bigger, and less restrictive, allowing the air to flow more freely. BUT CFM should go up. meaning more air is getting into the engine. so thats probably why you get the mixed answers
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 05:13 PM
  #15  
RBC's Avatar
RBC
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-25-05
Posts: 4,359
Likes: 3
From: Saginaw/Fort Worth, Texas
Originally Posted by 06blackg85ss
I have the site for em, just pics of the ones for the m90's but the guy does m62's also...
http://www.rollingperformance.com/snoutrebuild.htm
That sounds good. When you do it you should do a how to with pics of our actual blower. I hope it works as great as they made it sound.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 05:36 PM
  #16  
ptrblkz24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-05
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
From: mt kisco,ny
Whatever happened to the people that were filling in the silencer holes with jb weld?Did it make the blower any louder?One person on here filled them in,but he also put a smaller pulley on at the same time,so you cant go by that.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 05:43 PM
  #17  
06blackg85ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-06
Posts: 15,211
Likes: 20
From: New York
Originally Posted by RBC
That sounds good. When you do it you should do a how to with pics of our actual blower. I hope it works as great as they made it sound.
no prob. I actually have one mostly apart right now. I'll take some pics before I go any further though.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 05:47 PM
  #18  
chevysalesman614's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-03-06
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
Originally Posted by ptrblkz24
Whatever happened to the people that were filling in the silencer holes with jb weld?Did it make the blower any louder?One person on here filled them in,but he also put a smaller pulley on at the same time,so you cant go by that.
IDK, but i can't imagine it would help performance. probably hurt it. I mean, if your closing them, you're robbing it of airflow that it was designed to have flowing through it.. dosen't make alot of sense when you think of it like that does it?

p.s. i don't have any proof to offer.. but I'll bet that would make even more heat.

Last edited by chevysalesman614; Jun 17, 2007 at 05:47 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 05:57 PM
  #19  
ptrblkz24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-05
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
From: mt kisco,ny
Originally Posted by chevysalesman614
IDK, but i can't imagine it would help performance. probably hurt it. I mean, if your closing them, you're robbing it of airflow that it was designed to have flowing through it.. dosen't make alot of sense when you think of it like that does it?

p.s. i don't have any proof to offer.. but I'll bet that would make even more heat.
If you port the blower,and fill the silencer holes in,i dont see any negetive affect from it.Its not like the holes are big enough to cause any restriction in the airflow.Im not doing it,i was just wondering.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 06:26 PM
  #20  
chevysalesman614's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-03-06
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
Originally Posted by ptrblkz24
If you port the blower,and fill the silencer holes in,i dont see any negetive affect from it.Its not like the holes are big enough to cause any restriction in the airflow.Im not doing it,i was just wondering.
i was talking about filling the holes in only, but still, if you ported/polished it why would you wanna close them? most people make the main hole bigger, so they can merge all three together
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 12:55 AM
  #21  
RBC's Avatar
RBC
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-25-05
Posts: 4,359
Likes: 3
From: Saginaw/Fort Worth, Texas
Originally Posted by ptrblkz24
If you port the blower,and fill the silencer holes in,i dont see any negetive affect from it.Its not like the holes are big enough to cause any restriction in the airflow.Im not doing it,i was just wondering.
Plus one rep
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
KMO43
Front Page News
33
Jan 12, 2016 12:01 AM
Jesse
Parts
15
Oct 13, 2015 09:32 PM
goaliemo
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
6
Sep 28, 2015 01:37 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
Sep 27, 2015 08:53 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 PM.