2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

possibly twincharging...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 10:50 AM
  #26  
tylerjclance's Avatar
Thread Starter
USA Y U NO HAVE AUTOBAHN?
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 08-24-10
Posts: 12,841
Likes: 2
From: Warren, IN
zzp's turbo builder kit is all i need.. really. LOL

Originally Posted by Sir_Hiro
I dont think anyone has ever tuned a twincharged..and had it run right..I could be wrong tho..
youtube that ****

Last edited by tylerjclance; Aug 13, 2012 at 10:50 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 10:51 AM
  #27  
tylerjclance's Avatar
Thread Starter
USA Y U NO HAVE AUTOBAHN?
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 08-24-10
Posts: 12,841
Likes: 2
From: Warren, IN
how would an intercooler setup work on a twincharged system
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 11:09 AM
  #28  
juice3's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-13-09
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
From: Mascoutah, IL
Someone had one and sold his car with the setup. I'll try and look for the thread. He had list of his mods on it.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 11:15 AM
  #29  
tylerjclance's Avatar
Thread Starter
USA Y U NO HAVE AUTOBAHN?
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 08-24-10
Posts: 12,841
Likes: 2
From: Warren, IN
I have a good idea of what I need, I just need to figure how the bov would be setup and how the intercooler would be setup, if it is at all needed..
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 11:40 AM
  #30  
Bluelightning's Avatar
Got Bewst?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 03-16-10
Posts: 10,948
Likes: 33
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Originally Posted by Sir_Hiro
I dont think anyone has ever tuned a twincharged..and had it run right..I could be wrong tho..
Never heard of ZZP? Haha

Ryan's Twincharged Cobalt Runs 11.09 - YouTube
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 11:41 AM
  #31  
tylerjclance's Avatar
Thread Starter
USA Y U NO HAVE AUTOBAHN?
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 08-24-10
Posts: 12,841
Likes: 2
From: Warren, IN
i drew this up to make sure I understand it right
Name:  twincharge.png
Views: 266
Size:  24.5 KB

but then I saw this image where there is no intercooler


Last edited by tylerjclance; Aug 13, 2012 at 11:41 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 11:48 AM
  #32  
carstedt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 10-17-10
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: ft. lewis/ milwaukee, WI
idk if this has been answered before...would u be able to possibly run a water/air intercooler setup with a twincharge?
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 11:52 AM
  #33  
StruttinSoul's Avatar
Premium Member
 
Joined: 10-08-09
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
From: I have no idea what I'm doing.
Originally Posted by tylerjclance
but then I saw this image where there is no intercooler

Crazy honda people...
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 12:40 PM
  #34  
wayfarer's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 06-08-12
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: colorado springs
I have never done this myself, though I would absolutely love to at some point, BUT, from what I understand, HEAT is the biggest issue-- compressing air automatically creates heat, and you are talking about compressing it twice-- plan on intercooling. ALL the cooling mods under the TVS, and as much as you dare with the turbo--I'd go air to water under the turbo.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 12:42 PM
  #35  
StruttinSoul's Avatar
Premium Member
 
Joined: 10-08-09
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
From: I have no idea what I'm doing.
You don't cool under a turbo, you cool the charged air before it gets into the engine.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 12:49 PM
  #36  
wayfarer's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 06-08-12
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: colorado springs
Originally Posted by StruttinSoul
You don't cool under a turbo, you cool the charged air before it gets into the engine.
I know. semantics. cool after turbo. cool between turbo and supercharger. however you want to say it, as long as the point gets across.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 01:00 PM
  #37  
Sully20's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-11
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
From: Pottstown, PA
Kangol Riot I belive did this and it was a complete waste of money, It was pretty awesome but they constantley had issues with Tuning and I believe he was around 400 WHP. But he put litterally Thousands of dollars into that build and at the end it just would have made more sense to Turbo Swap it, IMO. I am aware of the cool factor tho and do LOVE the idea myself.....If you could make it work that would be VERY Impressive.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 01:04 PM
  #38  
Melon's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: 06-11-07
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
did u try contacting zzp and see if they would sell u wut u would u need? i tried once but i don't think i ever got an answer. it is an epic cool factor and if u pull it off i may be borrowing ur build list. lol
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 01:34 PM
  #39  
turbosmart4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 01-21-12
Posts: 12,240
Likes: 1
From: Alaska
I had dreams of building it like this.... Includes mod list btw
YouTube - 398whp Cobalt SS Twincharged
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 01:38 PM
  #40  
BlackMagic's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-24-09
Posts: 848
Likes: 3
From: South Dakota
Originally Posted by tylerjclance
I'll probably run the stock pulley on the tvs.. which I think is like 15psi??? am I wrong?

then maybe throw 8 psi through the turbo..

along with the cams and valve springs, I should see 400 easy with some tuning, yea?
I think you have a misunderstanding of how a twincharged setup works. the sc is only for the low end, once the turbo spools up the bypass on the sc opens up so the sc is "free spinning.". From there the turbo takes over. With that said 400 is not obtainable with only 8 psi
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 01:57 PM
  #41  
wayfarer's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 06-08-12
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: colorado springs
Originally Posted by BlackMagic
I think you have a misunderstanding of how a twincharged setup works. the sc is only for the low end, once the turbo spools up the bypass on the sc opens up so the sc is "free spinning.". From there the turbo takes over. With that said 400 is not obtainable with only 8 psi
my understanding of twincharging is that you can do two ways--

"parallel", as you describe above-- where the turbo is providing all your peak power and the blower is essentially "wasted" as soon as the turbo spools

or

"series", where both are run all the time, and boost is compounded.

the drawing provided above seemed to indicated a "series" setup. Seems like tuning would be FAR simpler with the "series" setup
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 02:36 PM
  #42  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,901
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
Originally Posted by Sully20
Kangol Riot I belive did this and it was a complete waste of money, It was pretty awesome but they constantley had issues with Tuning and I believe he was around 400 WHP. But he put litterally Thousands of dollars into that build and at the end it just would have made more sense to Turbo Swap it, IMO. I am aware of the cool factor tho and do LOVE the idea myself.....If you could make it work that would be VERY Impressive.
thats because the company building the car failed hard
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 03:27 PM
  #43  
Sully20's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-11
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
From: Pottstown, PA
Originally Posted by elecblue06
thats because the company building the car failed hard
Yeah, Your right that company screwed him hard.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 04:18 PM
  #44  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,901
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
Originally Posted by Sully20
Yeah, Your right that company screwed him hard.
not just him.. i dont understand for the life of me why people are such nutswingers on them
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 04:29 PM
  #45  
tylerjclance's Avatar
Thread Starter
USA Y U NO HAVE AUTOBAHN?
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 08-24-10
Posts: 12,841
Likes: 2
From: Warren, IN
hmmn. well the idea seems like it could work.. and I believe it can be done for half the cost of turbo swapping.. we'll see. . .


I'm just making sure I understand how it's setup though..

Air intake into the turbo, out to the intercooler, into the supercharger, into the engine.. out of the exhaust mani and into the turbo to spool it up...



yes?

It would be compounding the boost.. 8psi on a turbo along with 15psi on the supercharger.. that's 23 twincharged PSI..

15psi on a tvs makes more power than 15psi on an m62..

I feel that 23 is a safe amount that won't create a ridiculously amount of heat.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 04:57 PM
  #46  
SaberD's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-28-11
Posts: 734
Likes: 1
From: Rochester Hills, MI
you will probably need to retune for every season if you twin charge, and probably won't be able to drive it in the rain if you tune it in the dry. the tune is very sensitive as the sc has to be perfectly balanced with the turbo. as the density of the air changes, the efficiency of the tc and sc are affected at different rates. In theory you could probably do it with enough time, but you will probably be tuning the damn thing for a year until you could get it to accept all conditions. this is not a setup you would want for a daily driver.

Also you can't just add up the boost pressures between the turbo and sc. The amount of boost created by the sc depends completely on the pressure of the intake charge after the turbo (in case of a series setup), and the amount of boost created by both the turbo and sc depends on the pressure of the intake plenum (in case of a parallel setup). the supercharger will not increase the boost as much receiving air at 8psi as it will receiving air at atmospheric pressure (for the sc in a series setup) nor will the turbo or sc create as much pressure trying to force more air into a plenum that has additional pressure being added by another source (in case of a parallel setup). in other words, the volumetric efficiency is not isobaric in either case.

just to make things clear, a turbo doesn't make a car last longer than a supercharger. it produces far more heat than a supercharger, and the system is more complex thus resulting in more room for error. a turbo spins at much higher rpms and experiences much higher temperatures and thermal gradients.

Last edited by SaberD; Aug 13, 2012 at 05:15 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 05:44 PM
  #47  
KangolRiot's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-05-05
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
From: Marlborough Massachusetts
Just a heads up yeah it was cool being twincharged. However regret it 100% since I would have made way more power more reliably for less money for just going straight turbo. Also once you go twincharged you will not hear the whine anymore since you intake will now be a charge pipe. If you go for it good luck! You can check out my mod list. A lot of the parts in my list you won’t need since I went all out and some that are not in my list you will need because I was remote mount twincharged. If you go for it good luck though! Any other questions you have let me know and Ill try and help you.

Last edited by KangolRiot; Aug 14, 2012 at 05:28 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 01:02 AM
  #48  
wayfarer's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 06-08-12
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: colorado springs
I don't see how it could possibly come out cheaper in the end, as you need everything that the supercharger requires, AND everything that the turbo requires.

I was taught that boost is compounded in twincharging by MULTIPLYING the pressure ratios.

for example-- say your naturally aspirated engine makes 125 h.p. and you want 400. you need a 3.2 pressure ratio.

so let's say we stick a supercharger on and make 250 h.p.-- that's a 2.0 pressure ratio.

ok, now we want twincharge, so let's say we want each power adder to do half the work--the square root of 3.2 = 1.7888543..... we'll just call it 1.79.

so, the turbo compresses the air 1.79 times, and feeds it to the supercharger, which then forces 1.79 times the air into the intake than the engine can consume. 1.79 x 1.79 = 3.2041

if one atmosphere of pressure is 14.7 psi, then 3.2 atmospheres would be 47.04 psi, or theoretically you would need 32.34 pounds of boost to go from 125 h.p. to 400 h.p.

all of this is fine and dandy, but takes no account of temperature rise from boost, timing, detonation, atmospheric changes, fuel choice, and a million other things, but it gives a rough idea, and hey, it's fun to build stuff on paper!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ineedacobaltss
Parts
16
Nov 7, 2015 02:25 PM
RaginChopsuey
War Stories
16
Oct 27, 2015 01:27 PM
patooyee
2.4L LE5 Performance Tech
50
Oct 15, 2015 05:11 PM
Tupp
Suspension
5
Sep 30, 2015 08:18 PM
OPCrer
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
3
Sep 27, 2015 08:11 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:14 AM.