quick question
Yea, sorry but thats looks cheap and just as restrictive as an airbox, in fact, i think the airbox would give better air flow. thats the whole point of an intake. bigger tube=engine breathes better, engine breathes better=more air flow, more air flow=more hp
Completely solved my problem, bet it will here too. The only reason I even posted was because these symptoms are IDENTICAL to the ones I was having and couldn't figure it out...swapped the filter, car ran like a dream from then on. But what do I know? Its not like I ever had this exact same problem before.
Also oiled filters only cause a problem when if they are over oiled. I ran a Spectre filter airbox mod on my car for 25,000 miles. I have since ran a K&N attached to a RAW 3" intake. In the middle there I ran an AEM Dryflow on it and hated it. The Dryflow acts like a sponge if it gets wet, oiled filters tend to repel water a little better. A hydroshield is a decent idea with either.
Now judging from the picture of that 'jdm' nonsense, it appears that the MAF is closer to the throttle body and too close to the filter. That will definitely screw with the readings. Is it even made for the SS/SC, or is it a 2.2 or 2.4 intake? If you want to try to install it again I suggest unplugging your battery during the install and then plugging it back in. This will allow the PCM to forget the fuel trims and it has a better chance of relearning them 'better' with the new intake. The car may run poorly for a little while, but it will probably smooth out.
My $.02
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
I disagree. AEM has been the best intake I've had on the car. Just because it isnt flashy under the hood like K&N or Injen doesnt mean it performs just as well. I ditched the shitty dryflow filter and installed a K&N filter on mine, and love it.
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
I went from the AEM to the Rebel, and felt very little difference. Maybe some more low end.
Went back to the AEM + K&N filter, and my car runs great. I do believe the Rebel intake ***** with the fuel trims slightly, and that may be the reason my car runs better with the AEM.
All intakes for the LSJ net you anywhere from 7-10whp on average. So I find it hard to believe you felt a night and day difference. By the way I'm not knocking the Injen intake. It's a good intake, but so is the AEM. It's just not as flashy. I do feel the dryflow filter is shitty and that anyone with an AEM should switch over to a properly sized K&N filter.
To the OP the E-bay intake is junk, and the filter is placed too close to the MAF sensor. You need some distance from the MAF sensor & filter to give the air flow some time to straighten out, or the MAF sensor will be reading turbulent air which throws the readings off.
Last edited by Staged07SS; May 17, 2010 at 11:08 AM.
For those that care; those 'cheap' ebay / jdm intakes are pretty much identical to the injen's. I had one, it worked great... but you need to mod it to prevent it from throwing codes.
To mod it; you will notice the MAF area is larger then the rest of the pipe, with a neck-down on each side. On the filter side of the MAF housing, cut off the neck down. This will prevent the airflow readings from being skewed, and allow it to run properly.
To mod it; you will notice the MAF area is larger then the rest of the pipe, with a neck-down on each side. On the filter side of the MAF housing, cut off the neck down. This will prevent the airflow readings from being skewed, and allow it to run properly.
These cars are kinda picky with what intakes you put on them. Depending on where the maf is located will depend on what kind of problems you will have. Another thing is lean/rich codes caused by the extra air flow and maf location change. This is something that can be solved through tuning, if you are interested in learning more pm me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





