yeah even though i went 14.2 and put down 231 hahaha

 

lol i need to see what i put down on the dyno, who wants to do a clutch saturday????/

 

i don't want to haha.

holy **** man. i went from just doing 60s and a tune. to ******* 60s, 2.8, h/e

 

get NAWZ DUDE!!!

 

lol drugs, its my anti-mod

oh he has something up his sleeve

 

#'s are worthless if you're not tuning. times are more important, like posted above.

better off that way. you wouldn't really gain anything by just doing 60's and a tune.

 

i am tuned....

i ran 13.9 @ 104 with iat2 at 148* witht he rough tune

 

I've had no problems with the belt slipping at all & believe me if it was I would see the Dust!

 

alright well this is what i have coming to me by friday:
siemens 60's
harness
polished 2.8 from sfph
polished hub
ottp dual pass h/e
stage2 belt
2step colder plugs
and a tune from brian

should be pretty badass. i just hope the engine takes to this setup as well as it did with the stock tune.

and i will be doing a before/after dyno. the last time i was at this place i put down 231/205 back in like september or something. and i'll be doing another dyno stock when i get there this time. then dynoing after everything is said and done.

and then its off to the bash in texas on the 28th so see how much time i can take off my already quick run of 14.225@100 stock.

 

i was just saying getting #'s just for the sake of getting #'s is silly imo. every dyno is different. you guys use a high reading dyno it sounds like, unless he has a freak. you can take the same car, go to a low reading dyno, and get #'s that are WAY lower. they are way too inacurate, so i just never saw the point of getting a dyno just to know the #'s. just personal opinion.

 

mark has a freak, phillipino guy with stage 2 dyno'd around what he had its the dyno Area47 uses. i'm wanting just to get an idea of what i am putting down.. i hear what your sayin though. guess the people that cant drive for **** are out of luck then

 

when the track ET's back up the dyno number...i think it qualifies as valid.

.....that too hahaha. he has a modified stage2 tune on a 2.9 i believe...and put down same whp and only 2 more ftlbs

 

yea i'm thinking modifieds is pretty damn good

 

yeah, but its funny when bryan or brian, however the hell you spell his name, shows his numbers and everything like that. everyone is like "oh **** man" "those are killer" "mad props man" and **** like that. and then when we post up they're like yeah well dynos are different.... then they're told what dyno it is...and then stop talking. not you D4u2s0t, just...people in general

 

A) foreal brian which is it? i or y? B) i know exactly what you mean, if its one of the "guru" guys people tend not to argue. i do understand where he is coming from though there are alot of inaccurate dynos

 

Keep the stock belt and use an oversized tensioner. More surface area holding the belt tight = less chance for belt slip. Truth in words, and it will save you like $15 lol.

 

too late hahahah

 

lol oh well i guess you prob wont be dropping below a 2.8 will you

 

its poooooooooooooooooossible. but i'ld still use the stage2 belt and then get a tensioner