2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Settings

Old Feb 5, 2007 | 09:49 PM
  #1  
quickspec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 05-23-06
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Settings

Whats a good setting for a MAF-T with 42lbs injectors, aem cai, and a 2.6'' pulley?
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 10:00 PM
  #2  
intense_SS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 09-21-06
Posts: 4,368
Likes: 0
From: saint john,indiana
42's on a 2.6?????????? shoot yourself if your running that!! are you in the special olympics? get 60's man b4 ur car is toasted..that is like a 250% duty cycle!!
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 10:01 PM
  #3  
Allshot's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 05-27-06
Posts: 13,079
Likes: 0
From: San Leandro, CA
He is right
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 10:37 PM
  #4  
quickspec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 05-23-06
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by intense_SS
42's on a 2.6?????????? shoot yourself if your running that!! are you in the special olympics? get 60's man b4 ur car is toasted..that is like a 250% duty cycle!!
Then why when the first intense stage 3 kit came out someone, I think his name was Rob ran it with 42's and a 2.6'' pulley an was the first cobalt in the 12's. Remember I don't have a 7000 rpm redline, I have stock. BTW I don't have this yet.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 10:45 PM
  #5  
chevytech's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 04-15-06
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: mass.
does it really matter what someone did over a year ago? since then we have learned that even a 2.9in pulley with 42.5lb injectors can get very close to 100% duty cycle and sometimes even break 110% duty cycle depending on conditions. so if you were to run anything smaller than a 2.9 you will just be setting the car up for disaster. and if you run a 2.6 on 42.5's then you would just be purposely destroying the engine. and why would you be running a maf-t? they are unreliable and were just a quick fix for the inability to tune the pcm. now that tuning is availible running a maf-t just would'nt make alot of sense.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 10:46 PM
  #6  
intense_SS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 09-21-06
Posts: 4,368
Likes: 0
From: saint john,indiana
rob= a ******* moron ..so if you dont wanna engine anymore then i would suggest running 42's on a 2.6...otherwise get smart and get the 60's you schmuck!!
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 10:47 PM
  #7  
Allshot's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 05-27-06
Posts: 13,079
Likes: 0
From: San Leandro, CA
Originally Posted by intense_SS
rob= a ******* moron ..so if you dont wanna engine anymore then i would suggest running 42's on a 2.6...otherwise get smart and get the 60's you schmuck!!
Intense you have been hanging out with Rally to long
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 10:50 PM
  #8  
intense_SS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 09-21-06
Posts: 4,368
Likes: 0
From: saint john,indiana
lol i know he is rubbing off...im turning into an ******* like him but i cant help it with morons like this guy
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 10:51 PM
  #9  
quickspec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 05-23-06
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by chevytech
does it really matter what someone did over a year ago? since then we have learned that even a 2.9in pulley with 42.5lb injectors can get very close to 100% duty cycle and sometimes even break 110% duty cycle depending on conditions. so if you were to run anything smaller than a 2.9 you will just be setting the car up for disaster. and if you run a 2.6 on 42.5's then you would just be purposely destroying the engine. and why would you be running a maf-t? they are unreliable and were just a quick fix for the inability to tune the pcm. now that tuning is availible running a maf-t just would'nt make alot of sense.
Only reason I was thinking on going with the Maf-t is because I'm short on cash, so its a bad idea then? Would intense stage 4 be okay with a 2.6'' or maybe even a 2.5'' pulley.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 10:52 PM
  #10  
chevytech's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 04-15-06
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: mass.
has anyone heard from rob in awhile?
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 10:53 PM
  #11  
intense_SS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 09-21-06
Posts: 4,368
Likes: 0
From: saint john,indiana
yea he died cause his car blew up cause he was running 42's on a 2.6
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 10:54 PM
  #12  
quickspec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 05-23-06
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by intense_SS
lol i know he is rubbing off...im turning into an ******* like him but i cant help it with morons like this guy
I know you are not calling me a moron, right?
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 10:58 PM
  #13  
quickspec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 05-23-06
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by denny
LOL...reason why everybody here is freaking out is because you forgot to mention that you need a 2.8" pulley max or 2.6" with a boost controller. If you read my front page GOT BOOST PART II.... you will notice I was using a Boost controller to control the boost at 16-17PSI with the 2.6" pulley. That setup I used gave me a great amount of power.
I know, just got your message.
Thanks
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 10:58 PM
  #14  
intense_SS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 09-21-06
Posts: 4,368
Likes: 0
From: saint john,indiana
yea i am little buddy!! hahhahaha
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 11:01 PM
  #15  
quickspec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 05-23-06
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by intense_SS
yea i am little buddy!! hahhahaha
Your the reason why people are scared to ask questions? Why don't you be informative, like Denny.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 11:01 PM
  #16  
chevytech's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 04-15-06
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: mass.
the maf-t is outdated not useless, you could still run it but if your low on cash i would'nt even attempt to run a pulley in the 2.5-2.7 range. you will have to get a good tune 60lbers a full exhaust with header. if you run a 2.5 or certain 2.6's you will need to machine the snout. and you will have to run some sort of cooling setup like a dual pass intercooler endplate or a cobra heat exchanger if you want to run it safely at a good temp. once you run a pulley smaller than a 2.8 the m62 turns into a heat monster. o yeah and plan on a clutch and flywheel since the stock one wont likely last a month with that setup. that is the absolute bare minimum to run a setup with those pullies. you will also have to stiffen up your mounts and you might want to plan on needing some good axles if you drive it real hard or launch it hard at the track. cause you will break them if your not careful. you might even want to plan on some pistons even with a real good tune your walking in the danger zone with a 2.6 or smaller. esecially if you dont have hp tuners and an inate knowledge of how to tune.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 11:05 PM
  #17  
quickspec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 05-23-06
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
^^^ Thanks for the info.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 11:08 PM
  #18  
quickspec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 05-23-06
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
So your correct whp should've been 278, right or is that crank?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OrangeCoba
Suspension
1
Oct 1, 2015 10:00 PM
DANRICKARD
Problems/Service/Maintenance
8
Oct 1, 2015 12:08 AM
Tupp
Suspension
5
Sep 30, 2015 08:18 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
Sep 27, 2015 08:53 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:09 PM.