2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

stock block

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 05:34 PM
  #1  
TheGreyGhost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 04-03-07
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: Independence, MO
Question stock block

just wondering what the stock engine can handle in terms of power.

Just how much hp can the stock internals take ? I know the srt-4's have awesome holding power, something like 400-450 hp i think. And from what i have been hearing on here a mere 300 is pushing it on ours. Everyone seems to be talking about being a "piston #4 victim". Are our engines pretty weak ?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 05:39 PM
  #2  
HackAbuse's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-16-05
Posts: 11,137
Likes: 1
From: Central NY
Originally Posted by XVX
just wondering what the stock engine can handle in terms of power.

Just how much hp can the stock internals take ? I know the srt-4's have awesome holding power, something like 400-450 hp i think. And from what i have been hearing on here a mere 300 is pushing it on ours. Everyone seems to be talking about being a "piston #4 victim". Are our engines pretty weak ?
Our Fuel systems are weak


Returnless FTMFL
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 05:42 PM
  #3  
SilverBalt13's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 05-20-07
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
They say 350 is about the limit if your running your car perfect. But one bad mess up on the afr and the motor will get messed up haha. SO I would stay in the 300 range.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 05:48 PM
  #4  
TheGreyGhost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 04-03-07
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: Independence, MO
350 whp or motor ? cause 350 motor is like what ? 290ish wheel ? Thats not alot !
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 05:59 PM
  #5  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
The engines are stronger than most people think BUT the people who are attempting to push it are doing it with a inefficient stock supercharger that's building more heat than a 500 lb fat man sitting on a metal chair on a hot summer day in Arizona.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 06:03 PM
  #6  
HackAbuse's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-16-05
Posts: 11,137
Likes: 1
From: Central NY
Originally Posted by NJHK
The engines are stronger than most people think BUT the people who are attempting to push it are doing it with a inefficient stock supercharger that's building more heat than a 500 lb fat man sitting on a metal chair on a hot summer day in Arizona.
You live in Arizona now??


hahaha j/k, Adam, I love ya
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 06:04 PM
  #7  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by HackAbuse
You live in Arizona now??


hahaha j/k, Adam, I love ya
I love you too
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 06:05 PM
  #8  
05BlackCobaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-24-05
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
From: Southern Illinois
I thought our blocks were good for well beyond 300. I thought it was just the pistons that were weak...
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 06:15 PM
  #9  
HackAbuse's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-16-05
Posts: 11,137
Likes: 1
From: Central NY
It's just the AFR in our engines, it needs to be more closely adjusted / monitored
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 06:20 PM
  #10  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Originally Posted by HackAbuse
It's just the AFR in our engines, it needs to be more closely adjusted / monitored
Not the a/f (well some of the time they do) but it's more so the combustion chamber temperatures that are being created.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 06:30 PM
  #11  
HackAbuse's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-16-05
Posts: 11,137
Likes: 1
From: Central NY
Originally Posted by NJHK
Not the a/f (well some of the time they do) but it's more so the combustion chamber temperatures that are being created.
Well I think its contributed in a large part due to AFRs
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 06:44 PM
  #12  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
But not in every case...
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 06:50 PM
  #13  
Imlikedrpepper's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-18-06
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by NJHK
The engines are stronger than most people think BUT the people who are attempting to push it are doing it with a inefficient stock supercharger that's building more heat than a 500 lb fat man sitting on a metal chair on a hot summer day in Arizona.

Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 07:59 PM
  #14  
Mikey851's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-27-07
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by 05BlackCobaltSS
I thought our blocks were good for well beyond 300. I thought it was just the pistons that were weak...
According to GM if the pistons are swapped out you can make a little over 300WHP with the stock supercharger and higher compression. If that is the case, if one were to swap in stronger pistons and swap to a turbo then the rest of the components in the block could take WELL over 300WHP.

Just judging by the materials used my rough estimate would be that the crank itself would be able to handle around 400WHP or a little more (This is just IMO, not a fact). That's not a hard number but since the crank is forged and you would be able to make the adjustment to a LOWER compression to go with a high boost turbo, this power would be made using high boost high rpm, and less heat than the M62. If your goal was to build high HP and you weren't going for the big torque so much, you may even be able to get even more but many changes would have to be made to the efficiency of the head etc. But, as far as purely the materials used, the LSJ is a STRONG motor besides the pistons.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 10:21 AM
  #15  
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-06
Posts: 5,577
Likes: 3
From: Gainesville, FL
Originally Posted by HackAbuse
It's just the AFR in our engines, it needs to be more closely adjusted / monitored
Hack, that's true on any forced induction car, once you crank up the boost.

in truth, the block can take a LOT, as can the crank...

in the 2.2 the rods are good till the mid 200s, and in the 2.4 and 2.0 the mid 300s...

if you're going to want lots of power, in any of them, forged pistons is a must.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 10:48 AM
  #16  
SlayeR36987's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-11-07
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA.
Well here you go like i posted in the other thread: "GM Racing dynamometer tests confirm that major HP gains are possible w/ minimal mods. For instance, when building an ECOTEC engine up to 400HP level, no mods. to the cylinder head, block, main girdle or crankshaft are required." but if u go over that you will need to replace the block and install all those other parts. And really its easy to get 400HP out of these engines w/o the help of a NOS. These engines are also proven reliable and effective up to 11,000rpm. Hopes that helps out.

Originally Posted by XVX
350 whp or motor ? cause 350 motor is like what ? 290ish wheel ? Thats not alot !
Ha sry i was jus reading over the thread and saw this. There is no way u use 60HP from the engine when the axle comes rite out the side of the engine. lol This isnt a RWD car now.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 01:15 PM
  #17  
TheGreyGhost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 04-03-07
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: Independence, MO
Originally Posted by SlayeR36987
Well here you go like i posted in the other thread: "GM Racing dynamometer tests confirm that major HP gains are possible w/ minimal mods. For instance, when building an ECOTEC engine up to 400HP level, no mods. to the cylinder head, block, main girdle or crankshaft are required." but if u go over that you will need to replace the block and install all those other parts. And really its easy to get 400HP out of these engines w/o the help of a NOS. These engines are also proven reliable and effective up to 11,000rpm. Hopes that helps out.



Ha sry i was jus reading over the thread and saw this. There is no way u use 60HP from the engine when the axle comes rite out the side of the engine. lol This isnt a RWD car now.
ok great, whatis the power loss then ?
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 05:24 PM
  #18  
JD Racing's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 04-08-07
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: moncton
for how much power it can handle it all depend what is used for force induction used

supercharger creates lots of heat at high boost but a turbo at same boost will make way more power and creates way less heat

i didnt doo to many cobalts but i know it may start a war here

i did a few stock h22 honda motors, rod and piston are stock in every one ,just install a ticker head gasket on them

i have 3 0f them running turbo making over 350 whp at 15psi and one 400 whp at 18psi and all of them still running over 2 years

and i did one jacktion racing superchager one the motor is the same as the other motor at 12 psi making 210 whp timing set 4 degree lower than the turbo motor to stop the knock and it blew up twice

supercharger is a great system but only made to run a certain boost level
trying to make more power than it made for your only looking for problem

my estimate is a supercharge colbalt 250 whp it going to last
350 whp whit a turbo one whit the proper air/fuel and timing
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 05:27 PM
  #19  
xCobalt05x's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-15-06
Posts: 3,765
Likes: 0
From: Pocomoke City, MD
Originally Posted by XVX
just wondering what the stock engine can handle in terms of power.

Just how much hp can the stock internals take ? I know the srt-4's have awesome holding power, something like 400-450 hp i think. And from what i have been hearing on here a mere 300 is pushing it on ours. Everyone seems to be talking about being a "piston #4 victim". Are our engines pretty weak ?
the engine can handle roughly 8 to 10 lbs of boost if you can ever figure out how to tune the computer. With forged pistons and rods the engine will be able to handle 500hp. but again you have to figure out how to tune the computer or use stand alone fuel managment to get the power you want from a turbo
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 06:38 PM
  #20  
Mikey851's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-27-07
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by xCobalt05x
the engine can handle roughly 8 to 10 lbs of boost if you can ever figure out how to tune the computer. With forged pistons and rods the engine will be able to handle 500hp. but again you have to figure out how to tune the computer or use stand alone fuel managment to get the power you want from a turbo
What are you talking about? This thread is about the LSJ.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 06:49 PM
  #21  
xCobalt05x's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-15-06
Posts: 3,765
Likes: 0
From: Pocomoke City, MD
Originally Posted by Mikey851
What are you talking about? This thread is about the LSJ.
my bad
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 07:49 PM
  #22  
Mikey851's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-27-07
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by xCobalt05x
my bad
That's fine, I was just pointing it out.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 08:13 PM
  #23  
8cd03gro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-06
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: .
the stock internals are good for way more than the m62 can pump. These guys with 2.5" pulleys are instantly losing 70hp in parasitic loss to the m62 when they are spinning it that high. With the thermal innefficiency at that level a turbo or twin screw could also be tuned far more aggressively because of much lower ACT's. Flowing the same CFM (don't use boost in psi to compare two different types of forced induction...just please don't, you should know why) a proper turbo setup is gonna be making well over 100hp more than the cars with 2.5"s and 2.6"s with relatively the same stress on the internals. So just to get an idea... I guaruntee 350whp being safe on the stock longblock with a turbo setup. watch the tranny at that point though. and axles are donezo.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 08:20 PM
  #24  
07LaserBlueSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-07-06
Posts: 2,077
Likes: 0
From: Nowheresville
Originally Posted by NJHK
The engines are stronger than most people think BUT the people who are attempting to push it are doing it with a inefficient stock supercharger that's building more heat than a 500 lb fat man sitting on a metal chair on a hot summer day in Arizona.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Supercharged06SS
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
21
Dec 11, 2022 04:47 PM
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
Zharrington_2010LNF
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
21
Feb 8, 2016 01:43 PM
Jesse
Parts
15
Oct 13, 2015 09:32 PM
Jesse
Stuff
0
Oct 1, 2015 05:47 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 AM.