Strongest 2.9 M62 Car?
Strongest 2.9 M62 Car?
Went to a Dyno Day at a local shop yesterday and was absolutely stunned at the results.
Mods:
80# injectors
2.9 pulley
ZZP Midlength Header/Dp combo 1 ¾” primaries 3” to 2.5” dp gutted cat
Stock catback with a cut out
OTTP HE
Airbox Mod
Stock M62
E85
ebristol spot on tune
Numbers:
Graph:
Vids:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJGvpXMmAOc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iKIEWn7inU
As you can hear the car missfired around 6800 which leaves me to wonder if it has more. Eric thanks for the tune, its super bad ass!!
Mods:
80# injectors
2.9 pulley
ZZP Midlength Header/Dp combo 1 ¾” primaries 3” to 2.5” dp gutted cat
Stock catback with a cut out
OTTP HE
Airbox Mod
Stock M62
E85
ebristol spot on tune
Numbers:
Graph:
Vids:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJGvpXMmAOc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iKIEWn7inU
As you can hear the car missfired around 6800 which leaves me to wonder if it has more. Eric thanks for the tune, its super bad ass!!
There is more power to be made in the tune. I thought it was more on the conservative side!
Last edited by ebristol; Jun 7, 2010 at 08:07 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
The reason the car is running a little on the rich side is because of he AEM Uego Gauge was giving me different readings then the readings in HPTs. HPTs was telling me 11.5-11.8 and his gauge was telling displaying 12.1-12.3. Through the research I found that most people said that that gauge is correct and HPTs is wrong. So after I was done tuning I changed the commanded AFR in PE from 11.76 to 11.5 just to be on the safer side.
But it looks like the gauge is displaying correctly when not sharing the signal with HPTs.
No. I run on my local dynojet and this was a Mustang Dyno.
But after seeing these results I might need to make a trip to West Bend! jk
Aren't Mustang Dyno supposed to read lower?
I did think that Tyler's car pulled really hard for a 2.9". Esp in the mid to high RPMS.
I did make a comment to him that it felt like his car was faster then mine. But mine definitely has more TQ on the low end.
Tyler. Post your results in here.
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/dyno-results-170/official-dyno-thread-194257/
That makes you #2 on the list.
I did make a comment to him that it felt like his car was faster then mine. But mine definitely has more TQ on the low end.
Tyler. Post your results in here.
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/dyno-results-170/official-dyno-thread-194257/
That makes you #2 on the list.
Last edited by ebristol; Jun 7, 2010 at 08:42 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
I did think that Tyler's car pulled really hard for a 2.9". Esp in the mid to high RPMS.
I did make a comment to him that it felt like his car was faster then mine. But mine definitely has more TQ on the low end.
Tyler. Post your results in here.
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/showthread.php?t=194257
That makes you #2 on the list.
I did make a comment to him that it felt like his car was faster then mine. But mine definitely has more TQ on the low end.
Tyler. Post your results in here.
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/showthread.php?t=194257
That makes you #2 on the list.
West Bend Dyno in West Bend, WI. I don't have there address.
I want to get there the hard way.
I want to get there the hard way.
Last edited by stealthy1ss; Jun 7, 2010 at 09:59 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Member
Joined: 08-25-07
Posts: 307
Likes: 1
From: Canada, Quebec
Do you you think that he could have the same results if he had regular gas + methanol injection (something like 90% meth and 10% water or 100% meth with a big nozzle) ??? Is there any other factors than the fact that he could push up the timing in order to make more power with the E85?
+
So with a 2.6 he would get over 300 whp!
+
So with a 2.6 he would get over 300 whp!
Do you you think that he could have the same results if he had regular gas + methanol injection (something like 90% meth and 10% water or 100% meth with a big nozzle) ??? Is there any other factors than the fact that he could push up the timing in order to make more power with the E85?
+
So with a 2.6 he would get over 300 whp!
+
So with a 2.6 he would get over 300 whp!
......
Sort answer. No.
If you want to lean out the top part of the MAF then YOU get to drive! lol
Do you you think that he could have the same results if he had regular gas + methanol injection (something like 90% meth and 10% water or 100% meth with a big nozzle) ??? Is there any other factors than the fact that he could push up the timing in order to make more power with the E85?
Not to sure about getting the same results with 93 + meth. This car has more in it and I can see 300hp no problem with out using the 2.7 that I have for it. If you watch my wideband in the video you can see that it is running between 11.3 and 11.5 (at times dipping into the high 10's) so we could lean it out and possibly add a degree or two of timing. There is not too much room to go up in timing.
