2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Stumbled across a possible 2"primary LSJ Header?..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 11:24 AM
  #51  
spitefulxcheerio's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-13-09
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: Boca Raton
so now that the bickering is done, can we determine if this header is even worth it?

What do you guys think would produce the most power? a 1.75" header with a full 3" exhaust? Or what?
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 11:26 AM
  #52  
ilovecars's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 06-08-08
Posts: 6,663
Likes: 1
From: Hanover, Maryland
Property of RDFabs
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 11:28 AM
  #53  
JohnnySasakiMGS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-30-06
Posts: 2,975
Likes: 1
From: Upstate NY
Originally Posted by ilovecars
Property of RDFabs
Damn right!
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 11:58 AM
  #54  
ilovecars's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 06-08-08
Posts: 6,663
Likes: 1
From: Hanover, Maryland
Originally Posted by JohnnySasakiMGS
Damn right!
haha yea cody is muh buddy.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 12:09 PM
  #55  
Edubs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-01-06
Posts: 4,976
Likes: 2
From: West Coast, FL
lulz...

...yet another RD Fabs thread sidetracked to the nth degree!



Reply
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 01:44 PM
  #56  
Tinkles's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-23-08
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: PA
This header was fabbed up on a J-body L61, test fitted in Edubs 06 SS(before the final welding), and finally installed in a 03 Cav with Edubs old M62 set-up. There is no noticeable drop in low rpm torque or hp, but a nice gain up top. It has 2" O.D. primaries(about 1 7/8" I.D.) and a 3" collector, full 304 Stainless steel(including the LSJ header flange).

It is also mated to a full 3" exhaust and it was built with the anticipation of a TVS build on the cavalier.


They are available right now for purchase. You just have to get in touch with a sales rep from RD Fabs.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 04:31 PM
  #57  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by spitefulxcheerio
so now that the bickering is done, can we determine if this header is even worth it?

What do you guys think would produce the most power? a 1.75" header with a full 3" exhaust? Or what?
depends how much power you're pushing. it would be ideal for something like a 400-500whp cobalt, but if you're in the 200-300whp range, 1.75" primaries is plenty.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 04:51 PM
  #58  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
Originally Posted by Tinkles
This header was fabbed up on a J-body L61, test fitted in Edubs 06 SS(before the final welding), and finally installed in a 03 Cav with Edubs old M62 set-up. There is no noticeable drop in low rpm torque or hp, but a nice gain up top. It has 2" O.D. primaries(about 1 7/8" I.D.) and a 3" collector, full 304 Stainless steel(including the LSJ header flange).

It is also mated to a full 3" exhaust and it was built with the anticipation of a TVS build on the cavalier.


They are available right now for purchase. You just have to get in touch with a sales rep from RD Fabs.
1 7/8" inner diameter, good to know, that header doesn't seem so rediculous anymore. hmmm, I need a new header to fit my freshly re-ported head.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 05:30 PM
  #59  
ff_drift_lol's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 02-14-08
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 0
From: long island
that collector is beast
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 06:42 PM
  #60  
Tinkles's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-23-08
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: PA
Stock L61 collector vs 3" collector



Stock L61 ports vs SS LSJ flange


Inside of the collector


Installed


J-body down tube(minus the mangaflow)
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 06:52 PM
  #61  
ff_drift_lol's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 02-14-08
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 0
From: long island
awesome. I love that it's v-band too! some quality work right there.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2009 | 07:14 PM
  #62  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
Originally Posted by ralliartist
1 7/8" inner diameter, good to know, that header doesn't seem so rediculous anymore. hmmm, I need a new header to fit my freshly re-ported head.

What did you think it would be inside? of course its smaller than 2", when was the last time a header got sold by its primary ID????
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 07:07 AM
  #63  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
well, the title is 2", no telling what was meant. It's just nice to have the accurate info.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2009 | 09:58 PM
  #64  
RDFABS_Cody's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-08-07
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Syracuse, NY
Well I am not here to plugg our products because it is against the rules here, however I was directed by a member from JBO to a guy here who has been dyno testing exhaust manifolds. Were are looking into see what is required of us to make this happen by the member on here, and I guess those numbers will then speak for itself.

As far as the diameter were talking about here, yes the tubing is 2" OD and then 16ga thickness which makes it 1 7/8ths. That's just how its sold from our supplier.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2009 | 12:58 AM
  #65  
DaFlyinSkwirl's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 11-15-06
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Jackson, NJ
I would buy it based on the collector alone. verrrry nice merge.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2009 | 06:36 AM
  #66  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
Originally Posted by DaFlyinSkwirl
I would buy it based on the collector alone. verrrry nice merge.
x2, I was gawking over that collecter as well. This is a very nice piece.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2009 | 11:52 AM
  #67  
spike's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-01-06
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 1
From: IN
Originally Posted by DaFlyinSkwirl
I would buy it based on the collector alone. verrrry nice merge.
first time i have seen someone take the time to care about that part +3
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2009 | 10:40 PM
  #68  
Edubs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-01-06
Posts: 4,976
Likes: 2
From: West Coast, FL
That's why I've had RD Fabs work on all of my setups. Quality hand-built products that are warrantied...
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 01:39 PM
  #69  
phatnackySS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-03-06
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 4
From: Merritt Island ,Fl
Originally Posted by selfinfliction
honestly it's not worth it think about this:

4 x 1.5" = 6" area for exhaust to travel through

4 x 1.75 = 7" area

4 x 2" = 8" area

all three of which, go right into at the biggest a 1 x 3" pipe. this is why i find it funny when people argue about how much better a 1.75" primary header is than a 1.5" primary header the more volume you have, the slower the velocity. the slower the velocity, the less scavenging effect you have. so bigger on everything, isn't always better.
Expect for the fact that Exhaust is pulsed ... engine exhaust isnt all crammed together into one pipe , each pusle form each cylinder is separated form one another,imagine each exhaust pulse fallowing another in a single file line ,and not side by side.

2" primaries do seem large on a 2.0L engine until you think about how much power some guys are making on tvs,or nitrous, 3-400hp is a lot of air to move , you figuer a v8 makes 400hp while running 1-7/8 primeries ,but thats x 8 cylinders , theoretically you would need over 3" primers to flow the same amount of air on a 4cyl engine (excuse the gorilla math ) when you think of things volumetricly 2" really isnt that big.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 05:22 PM
  #70  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by phatnackySS
Expect for the fact that Exhaust is pulsed ... engine exhaust isnt all crammed together into one pipe , each pusle form each cylinder is separated form one another,imagine each exhaust pulse fallowing another in a single file line ,and not side by side.

2" primaries do seem large on a 2.0L engine until you think about how much power some guys are making on tvs,or nitrous, 3-400hp is a lot of air to move , you figuer a v8 makes 400hp while running 1-7/8 primeries ,but thats x 8 cylinders , theoretically you would need over 3" primers to flow the same amount of air on a 4cyl engine (excuse the gorilla math ) when you think of things volumetricly 2" really isnt that big.
most v8 guys dont run 1 7/8 primaries for 400hp builds...not even 400whp builds.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2009 | 08:34 PM
  #71  
RDFABS_Cody's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-08-07
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Syracuse, NY
Originally Posted by phatnackySS
2" primaries do seem large on a 2.0L engine until you think about how much power some guys are making on tvs,or nitrous, 3-400hp is a lot of air to move
This is the crowd we are trying to appeal to, those looking to make some larger numbers where the current applications available just are not sufficient for their needs.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2009 | 12:07 AM
  #72  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
Originally Posted by HunterKiller89
most v8 guys dont run 1 7/8 primaries for 400hp builds...not even 400whp builds.
600hp builds dont even require 1 7/8" primaries. a 2" primary on a smallblock V8 is HUUUUUGE.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
06MetallicBalt
Mid East
10
Jul 20, 2025 08:47 PM
Supercharged06SS
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
21
Dec 11, 2022 04:47 PM
tomj77
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
26
Oct 4, 2015 11:39 AM
ThoR294
General Cobalt
6
Sep 28, 2015 05:31 PM
goaliemo
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
6
Sep 28, 2015 01:37 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:18 AM.