Shanman

I have a fully built head and block with full cooling mods, I would love to be a test mule for the 1900, i am already one for your springs good Sir. I will also put a down payment on it as well. We can run E85, and extract some numbers about as quick as i can get a dyno at Granite State in NH. I have already been saving up for this.

jrmotosports 88

click waiting to see some results before pulling the trigger.

OhverDrive

damn, I got job another lsj.... might need to up the game

Hopefully you'll have something around March 2015!

freakta

iTrader: (1)

The more I look at it the more I want one

armcclure

iTrader: (2)

Has anyone actually received one yet

Josh@ottp

iTrader: (4)

Guys have had them since October/early November.

CobaltSS 16

iTrader: (3)

josh i can't believe you don't have any dyno numbers. how do expect to market and sell the product?

Get a test dummy, dyno with m62, TVS1320 and then TVS1900 (obviously changing injectors, tune and other needed parts) and do the numbers comparison.

Part A makes x amount of power more then Part B, Part C makes X amount of power over part B, etc.

armcclure

iTrader: (2)

Have they been sworn to secrecy? Why is there NOTHING here...

blueLNFftw

iTrader: (16)

IDK. Why not just ask them to post up pictures and reviews and install timelines?

freakta

iTrader: (1)

Well we know what the m62 does and the 1320. No need to dyno those ones. Just wonder who has the 1900 so we can bug them

riceburner

iTrader: (66)

yea but for strict comparison reasons tho!

mrbelvedere

iTrader: (3)

maybe on stock cams or zzp stuff but know one has any clue as to what they will do with the valve train set up right with cams

armcclure

iTrader: (2)

Right.

And as a disclaimer I wasn't slamming on josh.. Just saying if they're out there.. SOMEONE has so have at least an initial impression.

Staged07SS

iTrader: (25)

I know someone who knows someone who may or may not have a 1900

ECaulk

iTrader: (6)

Did you creep on the PMs?

Staged07SS

iTrader: (25)

no....

InfraRedline

iTrader: (4)

I know of a local here that has a 1900

Bluelightning

iTrader: (8)

i see what you did there lol

armcclure

iTrader: (2)

Well so do I ut it ain't on a cobalt lol

InfraRedline

iTrader: (4)

Lol damn it you guys are too smart

Spawne32

iTrader: (1)

I would presume that there HAS to be issues with belt slip on this setup, thats alot more rotating mass to be throwing around then what the LSJ is acustom to. Probably some kinks to be worked out before anyone can hit the dyno with them.

Blowncavy

iTrader: (2)

Might be on a cavalier

SSfamilywagon

iTrader: (2)

Belt slip won't be and issue. It's not like it's trying to rotate another motor. Steven just posted the parasitic loss a couple pages back.

Spawne32

iTrader: (1)

Wont be an issue, or isnt an issue? Because anytime you place a large drag on the belt drive especially when it comes from a small pulley like what the supercharger has, you increase the chance of slippage, ZZP has stated this multiple times for their small pulley setups for the M62.

armcclure

iTrader: (2)

Small pullies also decrease the contact area of the belt. No one is going to be running a 2.5 on one of these.
As wagon said the charts are a few pages back. It won't be an issue.


I jut want to know why all these kits are out and every single owner is dead silent.