2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

victory_red_SS update: sending back the turbo's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 18, 2007 | 08:15 PM
  #26  
06blackg85ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-06
Posts: 15,211
Likes: 20
From: New York
thats what I was thinking too man. budget is hurting right now though... putting most my paycheck away each week to buy a house next year so that is priority #1. But hopefully my side business starts pickin up some more, plus my 1/4 bonuses at work help too. Who made your bellhousing adapter for the T-56.. cause I could probably get my hands on one cheap. plus I have a few old rears lying around... plus my friend owns a metal shop... I might just be RWD #2 man.
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 08:29 PM
  #27  
06blackg85ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-06
Posts: 15,211
Likes: 20
From: New York
goddamn man
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 08:29 PM
  #28  
victory_red_SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
Update update, reading required

Originally Posted by Supercharged06
this thing is gonna be sick but with 2 huge turbos on there how is the thing gonna spool upi mean when it hit its gonna be like a f&*%in runnaway frieght train going down hill. but i feel like it will take so long to spool that it wont be worth it. but either way this car is gonna be awsome
Originally Posted by 06blackg85ss
he said he's using one smaller and one big turbo... small turbo spools quick to help spool the bigger turbo and in turn creates a **** load of boost and quicker spool time
So to better explain how we are doing the Twin Turbo System I am enclosing a quote and a couple of new pics, from JBP. This is really cool stuff.

Originally Posted by JBodyPerformance
TTS System Microcontroller

This is the best way we're going to be able to harness the switching capability of a twin turbo system for the Cobalt.

Whats it do?

Main Function
The TTS Controllers' main function is to solve the problem of displacement and turbo lag. The 2.0L LSJ can't drive two turbos in parallel and one enourmous turbo will lag for daily driving. Therefore we must find a way to halt the the flow of exhaust gases to drive the primary turbo, then the secondary turbo.

Other functions
The TTS has been engineered in order to function as a signal generator and controller for other vital functions. It's also engineered as a theft device that will not allow the vehicle to be started without a system code. Necessary precautions have been taken to allow manual subsystems to override the TTS' ability to control certain systems. (ie: Fuel Pump, Boost Control, etc..) However, in the event of a failure of any of the control system, the TTS will "politely" indicate an issue with a gentle alarm and yellow warning indicator. If the failure is detrimental to operation and safety, the TTS will disable the vehicle until the problem is fixed. Safety first.

The TTS will allow us a greater range of control over how the turbos operates. It can even take into consideration the wear and tear of a turbo and accommodate for change. Driven by the Honeywell military pressure transducer, and implementing a complex algorithm to reduce the need of a second transducer, the TTS will solve a lot of problems posed by twin-turboing a 4 cylinder.

It's a truly novel idea. One that may be impossible to mimic by others who wish to twin-turbo a small displacement engine.
Program screenshot

Microcontroller Unit Closed

Microcontroller Unit Open


Originally Posted by 06blackg85ss
thats what I was thinking too man. budget is hurting right now though... putting most my paycheck away each week to buy a house next year so that is priority #1. But hopefully my side business starts pickin up some more, plus my 1/4 bonuses at work help too. Who made your bellhousing adapter for the T-56.. cause I could probably get my hands on one cheap. plus I have a few old rears lying around... plus my friend owns a metal shop... I might just be RWD #2 man.
The bell housing needs to be SFI approved so we are using a LS1 housing and a custom adapter to mount that to the LSJ.
That will change from "might" to "will be" and then to "am" before to long. I don't need to be the only one.

Last edited by victory_red_SS; May 18, 2007 at 08:32 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 08:31 PM
  #29  
06blackg85ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-06
Posts: 15,211
Likes: 20
From: New York
I hear ya man. gotta send me a list of parts so I can start shopping. I'm taking the nitrous out of my lincoln tomorrow so I don't blow up my daily driver before the balt is done. lol
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 08:57 PM
  #30  
sunfirejoe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-13-05
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 1
From: Midwest. AB
what did u pay for your honeywell transducer im kinda curious cuz thats up my alley of work, im soon to be an instrument technician, you have no idea how many twin turbo compressors that ive put psv's on as a waste gate instead its fun,

i would have went a couple different ways on the transducer as there is better for cheaper, but thats the trick of the trade, do u know what psv's they are using, and what there going to set for
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 09:31 PM
  #31  
victory_red_SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by sunfirejoe
what did u pay for your honeywell transducer im kinda curious cuz thats up my alley of work, im soon to be an instrument technician, you have no idea how many twin turbo compressors that ive put psv's on as a waste gate instead its fun,

i would have went a couple different ways on the transducer as there is better for cheaper, but thats the trick of the trade, do u know what psv's they are using, and what there going to set for
The honeywell was $1k but I am not sure which psv's we got. I will ask and what do you mean by "set for"?
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 10:09 PM
  #32  
Blown 4-banger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-06
Posts: 7,570
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
I'm thinking about going RWD eventually, if I went RWD, I would transplant the motor to the back. No extra weight (tranny, driveshaft, rear end ect), no fabbing up adaptors, or having to change the mounting style of the motor. If I did all or most of the work it would be A LOT cheaper than leaving the motor in the front. Also it would have more weight over the rear wheels for better traction.
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 10:20 PM
  #33  
sunfirejoe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-13-05
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 1
From: Midwest. AB
well that honeywell u def got hit with a good markup lol, i wont lie on that one, but normally psv's are set for a certain pop off pressure, u can get electronic psv's but they are well yah very pricy lol, i could see the transducer being used as way to open a valve at certain pressure, cuz its kinda what its meant for, but yah a normal psv ran by air is set for a certain pop off pressure, so once it hits a certain pressure it relieves presure,

but it sounds like and looks like how i set up a recent pressure truck, except i used a honeywell pressure transmitter and programmed in my program to open a valve at 1500 psi so the ******* wouldnt blow the piping up, looking at the screen that JBP set-up that your using actuators to open up. thus using a transducer, shall be interesting set-up to see, i need pitures for sure
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 12:09 AM
  #34  
rickyw's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-01-06
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh NC
nice keep us posted please
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 01:30 AM
  #35  
06blackg85ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-06
Posts: 15,211
Likes: 20
From: New York
Originally Posted by Blown 4-banger
I'm thinking about going RWD eventually, if I went RWD, I would transplant the motor to the back. No extra weight (tranny, driveshaft, rear end ect), no fabbing up adaptors, or having to change the mounting style of the motor. If I did all or most of the work it would be A LOT cheaper than leaving the motor in the front. Also it would have more weight over the rear wheels for better traction.
but that still wouldn't solve the problem of how shitty our tranny's are... no way in hell are they gonna hold anything over 300 wtq
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 01:34 AM
  #36  
JKennedy1612's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-03-07
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
is going on with this thread?
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 01:43 AM
  #37  
BaltM62's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-05-06
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach
i guess i missed it, but what is your target hp?
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 01:44 AM
  #38  
Cobalt_Supercharged's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-05
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Wow. That is insane. I can't wait till you get it done. Glad to see that you are going sequential. Last I understood you were putting them parallel which didn't make sense to me, but sequential does.
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 01:45 AM
  #39  
8cd03gro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-06
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: .
i can see your future victory....

Victory reds car when he is done.
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 02:05 AM
  #40  
yellowcobaltss05's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-20-05
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
From: Delray Beach, FL
^^lmao
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 02:09 AM
  #41  
8cd03gro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-06
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: .
but seriously... i want that thing. best honda ever. can't wait for the v-tec on that bitch.
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 02:32 AM
  #42  
JKennedy1612's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-03-07
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro
but seriously... i want that thing. best honda ever. can't wait for the v-tec on that bitch.
This is a little off subject...but I test drove the new Si today. I cannot get over how good the transmission feels and how solid the engine runs. It is the smoothest 6 speed I have ever driven. Aside from the feel, the car doesn't go and styling inside and out is awful. What a waste...
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 02:35 AM
  #43  
8cd03gro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-06
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: .
Originally Posted by jkennedy1612
This is a little off subject...but I test drove the new Si today. I cannot get over how good the transmission feels and how solid the engine runs. It is the smoothest 6 speed I have ever driven. Aside from the feel, the car doesn't go and styling inside and out is awful. What a waste...
that's the problem though. You can NOT get that feel with real good power for that kind of price, you take one or the other. great performance, great feel, or somewhere in the middle. that price range cant give you both in a new car.
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 02:38 AM
  #44  
JKennedy1612's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-03-07
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro
that's the problem though. You can NOT get that feel with real good power for that kind of price, you take one or the other. great performance, great feel, or somewhere in the middle. that price range cant give you both in a new car.
This is true. However, even more expensive cars it's hard to find that median. For instance, in my C5...it's brutal power but sloppy transmission. The engine doesn't feel anywhere near as solid as the Si did. Maybe Porsche has the answer...
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 02:41 AM
  #45  
8cd03gro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-06
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: .
Originally Posted by jkennedy1612
This is true. However, even more expensive cars it's hard to find that median. For instance, in my C5...it's brutal power but sloppy transmission. The engine doesn't feel anywhere near as solid as the Si did. Maybe Porsche has the answer...
new 335i = the sex. Drives real nicely, is damn fast for the price, and has tons of potential for modding. wait til the new m3 comes out and that thing will drop even more in price. Spend mid 30's on a car that rides like a bimmer, but goes like a raped ape. with a tune i guaruntee that thing hits mid 12's.
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 02:54 AM
  #46  
JKennedy1612's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-03-07
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro
new 335i = the sex. Drives real nicely, is damn fast for the price, and has tons of potential for modding. wait til the new m3 comes out and that thing will drop even more in price. Spend mid 30's on a car that rides like a bimmer, but goes like a raped ape. with a tune i guaruntee that thing hits mid 12's.
I really dislike the rear end of the 335i. I think they ruined the car with those tail lights. The front fascia is stylish and muscular...but the motif doesn't carry over throughout the rest of the car.

I'm not a BMW fan for many reasons...most of which are associated with the brand name rather than the car itself. For a true sports car, I wouldn't own a BMW - Corvette all the WAY.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKRQsEgZAng

Watch the muscle of that supercharged C6 go. If you think it's loud wait till he hits the throttle at 1:01. Nothing screams sports car like that one does...
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 09:36 AM
  #47  
victory_red_SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by jkennedy1612
is going on with this thread?
You weren't around for the original thread where I state that I am going hunting for the big V's............................... Vettes and Vipers.


Originally Posted by BaltM62
i guess i missed it, but what is your target hp?
We are going for 750RWHP


Originally Posted by 8cd03gro
i can see your future victory....

Victory reds car when he is done.
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 09:42 AM
  #48  
rickyw's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-01-06
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh NC
so how much is it costing just to go rear wheel drive?
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 09:50 AM
  #49  
victory_red_SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by rickyw
so how much is it costing just to go rear wheel drive?
It isn't as simple as that because in that cost I am having a complete chassis built and the back end tubbed. I am also modifying many things to fit the T56 tranny and put in the 4-link suspension. With out doing these parts of the conversion, it would be considerably cheaper.
For people just wanting to be a Cobalt version of a Sky/Soltice the cost could likely be much more palatable.
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 11:21 AM
  #50  
Asphalt Assault's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-14-06
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 1
From: soon to banned as I am from MANITOBA?
Originally Posted by victory_red_SS
It isn't as simple as that because in that cost I am having a complete chassis built and the back end tubbed. I am also modifying many things to fit the T56 tranny and put in the 4-link suspension. With out doing these parts of the conversion, it would be considerably cheaper.
For people just wanting to be a Cobalt version of a Sky/Soltice the cost could likely be much more palatable.
That sounds good to me. that would be fun.

Your injectors work by the way. thanks. just causing problems for me though. Tires break loose at 70Kmh in second gear


Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:36 PM.