went to the dyno
went to the dyno
ok i went to the mustang dyno on saturday. was kinda depressed, but there was a 05 cobalt ss/sc with 2.8 and 60s no cooling mod's! and got 224Whp....here is mine. elavation was around 4200...any thoughts why my car is low?
red is HP
blue is torque

red is HP
blue is torque

Did you dyno your car stock @ this exact dyno?
if not, your graph is nothing more than a drawing of your power curve.
The stock system is more than capable of insuring a 2.8 setup is cooled for a couple dyno runs. Cooling mods don't work miracles
if not, your graph is nothing more than a drawing of your power curve.
The stock system is more than capable of insuring a 2.8 setup is cooled for a couple dyno runs. Cooling mods don't work miracles
thats all it is ever doing. it doesnt matter if its the same dyno, there is always going to be a percentage of error. dyno is a tuning device, not a tell all power indicator
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
2.8 pulley + no supporting mods = 
Look into a full exhaust (header back). The amount of airflow the 2.8 pulley produces needs a higher flowing setup than the stock manifold, downpipe, and catback.

Look into a full exhaust (header back). The amount of airflow the 2.8 pulley produces needs a higher flowing setup than the stock manifold, downpipe, and catback.
I pulled 251 whp on zzp's mustang dyno with a 3" pulley and no cooling mods. Only thing i can think that helped me is the exhaust. Do a full exhaust and your numbers will be way higher probly.
Yeah bro the exat is correct. I just tuned 6 Balts Saturday and one guy had no exaust 3 pulley no intake and 60s,,... we put 93 in it and his iat2s were good but he had kr on his stag to tune he got from ottp bad so I tuned him for his mods and he was getttng kr here and there so I had to take timing out little by little... The maf was off by like .2% in some but most was 0 and the ve was off by 1 or -1 so tune was good... His issue was the lack of air flow... So do ure exaust and u will see better numbers
i had my car dynoed that same day at the same place and only got 205... mods are below. i even had my HOM on too. my first pull was good but my second and third they said i had heat soak. i checked my ic pump and it was bad but still i only got 205 on my first pull...i thought i woulda had more for sure
i had my car dynoed that same day at the same place and only got 205... mods are below. i even had my HOM on too. my first pull was good but my second and third they said i had heat soak. i checked my ic pump and it was bad but still i only got 205 on my first pull...i thought i woulda had more for sure
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
To make numbers that low, I think it falls on the dyno. Remember not every dyno is guaranteed to produce 100% accurate numbers. Too many factors are at play. Dyno hardware (dynojet requires an add-on air brake to provide load for boosted cars), calibration, operator error, etc.
If your car is running fine, and your coolant pump is working, then screw the dyno. lol
If your car is running fine, and your coolant pump is working, then screw the dyno. lol
well they had the dyno calibrated for us a week before we came cuz they knew a lot of people were going to come and dyno...and just to show how hot my m62 was after my first pull they poured water on it and it just steamed right off of it and i didn't see any hit the ground

as far as e85 i was running half 91 and half e85... my HOM stays on and i feel like my car runs better for some reason when i don't have HOM on. biggest thing that sucks is my gas mileage goes down but if my car is running better then i will make that sacrifice
as far as e85 i was running half 91 and half e85... my HOM stays on and i feel like my car runs better for some reason when i don't have HOM on. biggest thing that sucks is my gas mileage goes down but if my car is running better then i will make that sacrifice





