went to the dyno
@ G11: That dyno/shop sounds like it is run by used car salesmen, lol. Half 91 and half e85? Please tell me youre kidding.
@ 55supercharged: 223 is nowhere close to right for a 2.8 w/ 60s. If you want to get some more realistic numbers keep an eye out for the next FWDPerformance dyno day. Their dynocom puts down the most accurate numbers I've seen in town.
@ 55supercharged: 223 is nowhere close to right for a 2.8 w/ 60s. If you want to get some more realistic numbers keep an eye out for the next FWDPerformance dyno day. Their dynocom puts down the most accurate numbers I've seen in town.
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
To the guys with the low dyno pulls. If you have an Interceptor or HP Tuners do a run logging mass air flow (lbs/min) & rpm (just to see where your peak power is). You can then take your reading, and divide your mass air flow output by 0.108 lbs/min (0.108 lbs/min = approx. 1 bhp). Once you get your brake horsepower reading take about 12% (avg. percent driveline loss for cobalts), and you will get an idea of what your actual whp is.
Dynos vary so much, and get so many people upset when they produce low numbers. At least with this calculation you can get an idea of where your car is power wise, and can at least compare it when you try out a different dyno.
Ex. 30.23 lbs/min / 0.108 lbs/min = 279.91 BHP * 0.88 = 246.32 WHP.
Dynos vary so much, and get so many people upset when they produce low numbers. At least with this calculation you can get an idea of where your car is power wise, and can at least compare it when you try out a different dyno.
Ex. 30.23 lbs/min / 0.108 lbs/min = 279.91 BHP * 0.88 = 246.32 WHP.
Last edited by Staged07SS; Oct 5, 2010 at 02:08 PM.
@ G11: That dyno/shop sounds like it is run by used car salesmen, lol. Half 91 and half e85? Please tell me youre kidding.
@ 55supercharged: 223 is nowhere close to right for a 2.8 w/ 60s. If you want to get some more realistic numbers keep an eye out for the next FWDPerformance dyno day. Their dynocom puts down the most accurate numbers I've seen in town.
@ 55supercharged: 223 is nowhere close to right for a 2.8 w/ 60s. If you want to get some more realistic numbers keep an eye out for the next FWDPerformance dyno day. Their dynocom puts down the most accurate numbers I've seen in town.
To many factors come into play
sorry to say no im not kidding... could there be any problems with that? going lean maybe? i haven't had any codes or anything on my car. I feel for some reason like it makes my car better than with just 91 in it
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cptnslo
Complete Cars
9
Sep 24, 2015 09:32 AM




