2.2 to 2.4 conversion
Thread Starter
Joined: 09-24-06
Posts: 4,535
Likes: 196
From: Virginia Beach, VA
2.2 to 2.4 conversion
On another forum, there was talk about swapping a 2.4 crank into a 2.2. One person said it would make the 2.2 into a 2.4. I know you would need a tune, but what else would you need to swap to make this work?
Why try to half ass a motor together when you can just build a 2.2 correctly?
Sure it is, have you done it? I think not.
Last edited by 06_ion2; Mar 17, 2010 at 07:01 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
K24/20 series frankenstein,
B18/16 series frankenstein
those are just a couple of the variants of honda engines variants which used in the correct combo results in some good power.
same kinda thing amongst many brands, it's just unheard of in ecotecs.
what ya should do is examine the books for the le5 and l61. if yur gonna do the crank, do the rods and pistons too. then you'd pretty much have a le5 performance-wise, just wouldn't have the variable timing chevy vtecness hahaha though.
not too much work, just gotta probably do your research a bit.
mmmm......nothing wrong with building an engine using parts from different variants.
K24/20 series frankenstein,
B18/16 series frankenstein
those are just a couple of the variants of honda engines variants which used in the correct combo results in some good power.
same kinda thing amongst many brands, it's just unheard of in ecotecs.
what ya should do is examine the books for the le5 and l61. if yur gonna do the crank, do the rods and pistons too. then you'd pretty much have a le5 performance-wise, just wouldn't have the variable timing chevy vtecness hahaha though.
not too much work, just gotta probably do your research a bit.
K24/20 series frankenstein,
B18/16 series frankenstein
those are just a couple of the variants of honda engines variants which used in the correct combo results in some good power.
same kinda thing amongst many brands, it's just unheard of in ecotecs.
what ya should do is examine the books for the le5 and l61. if yur gonna do the crank, do the rods and pistons too. then you'd pretty much have a le5 performance-wise, just wouldn't have the variable timing chevy vtecness hahaha though.
not too much work, just gotta probably do your research a bit.

Thread Starter
Joined: 09-24-06
Posts: 4,535
Likes: 196
From: Virginia Beach, VA
I'm completely new to the building an engine thing... I just trying to grab some ideas and see what will work and what would need to be done. The other thing I was wondering is it possible to use a 2.4 ECU with a 2.2? I know this is performance. Maybe I'll look around the tuning section for a bit.
I'm completely new to the building an engine thing... I just trying to grab some ideas and see what will work and what would need to be done. The other thing I was wondering is it possible to use a 2.4 ECU with a 2.2? I know this is performance. Maybe I'll look around the tuning section for a bit.
I will be working on putting an L61 head on an LE5 bottom end in my cavalier shortly (which is a bit trickier than the cobalt), but here's the story.
If you have a 2007 or newer L61, the crank triggers should be the same (60-2), so you simplly bolt on an L61 head and run the L61 PCM, with a retune of course. Otherwise you need an external crank trigger bolted and timed properly to your crank pulley You will get a nice bump in compression as the LE5 is already 10.4:1 and you have a smaller chamber volume with the L61 head. I've also heard that your better off getting an LE5 bottom end w/o the oil cooler option to make life easier.
I've heard of one instance of this hybrid done in a fiero swap, and the owner reported that the car needs bumpier cams because there is a lack of high rpm power using a stock L61 head/cam combo. FWIW, I think he was maybe a little disappointed and thought he would have a beast right off the bat.
The big benefit of this swap (for me) is having the LE5 bottom end that's been proven to about 400hp.
Why is everyone making it sound so difficult?
If you have a 2007 or newer L61, the crank triggers should be the same (60-2), so you simplly bolt on an L61 head and run the L61 PCM, with a retune of course. Otherwise you need an external crank trigger bolted and timed properly to your crank pulley You will get a nice bump in compression as the LE5 is already 10.4:1 and you have a smaller chamber volume with the L61 head. I've also heard that your better off getting an LE5 bottom end w/o the oil cooler option to make life easier.
I've heard of one instance of this hybrid done in a fiero swap, and the owner reported that the car needs bumpier cams because there is a lack of high rpm power using a stock L61 head/cam combo. FWIW, I think he was maybe a little disappointed and thought he would have a beast right off the bat.
The big benefit of this swap (for me) is having the LE5 bottom end that's been proven to about 400hp.
Why is everyone making it sound so difficult?
I will be working on putting an L61 head on an LE5 bottom end in my cavalier shortly (which is a bit trickier than the cobalt), but here's the story.
If you have a 2007 or newer L61, the crank triggers should be the same (60-2), so you simplly bolt on an L61 head and run the L61 PCM, with a retune of course. Otherwise you need an external crank trigger bolted and timed properly to your crank pulley You will get a nice bump in compression as the LE5 is already 10.4:1 and you have a smaller chamber volume with the L61 head. I've also heard that your better off getting an LE5 bottom end w/o the oil cooler option to make life easier.
I've heard of one instance of this hybrid done in a fiero swap, and the owner reported that the car needs bumpier cams because there is a lack of high rpm power using a stock L61 head/cam combo. FWIW, I think he was maybe a little disappointed and thought he would have a beast right off the bat.
The big benefit of this swap (for me) is having the LE5 bottom end that's been proven to about 400hp.
Why is everyone making it sound so difficult?
If you have a 2007 or newer L61, the crank triggers should be the same (60-2), so you simplly bolt on an L61 head and run the L61 PCM, with a retune of course. Otherwise you need an external crank trigger bolted and timed properly to your crank pulley You will get a nice bump in compression as the LE5 is already 10.4:1 and you have a smaller chamber volume with the L61 head. I've also heard that your better off getting an LE5 bottom end w/o the oil cooler option to make life easier.
I've heard of one instance of this hybrid done in a fiero swap, and the owner reported that the car needs bumpier cams because there is a lack of high rpm power using a stock L61 head/cam combo. FWIW, I think he was maybe a little disappointed and thought he would have a beast right off the bat.
The big benefit of this swap (for me) is having the LE5 bottom end that's been proven to about 400hp.
Why is everyone making it sound so difficult?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




