3" or 2.5"??
3" or 2.5"??
ok so ive heard that 3" downpipe is too large to use with n/a. but i would like to know why. what type of performance differences would be had between the two sizes. currently i have a short ram intake and a tsudo catback.
That's what I always hear. I contacted zzp and zoomer said that the difference in power I would see from the 3in vs 2.5 would be 1-2 ft lbs of torque. So I assume that I would not gain as much low end but a little more high end. Thank you for commenting appreciate the input
low end HP..such as low to mid 200's.
*edits* hes refering about DP not whole exhaust(I hope), I have a 2.5" header back system with the new turbo setup and feeling Peerty goood. This is all from MY past/current situation(s), so i may be a little off.
*edits* hes refering about DP not whole exhaust(I hope), I have a 2.5" header back system with the new turbo setup and feeling Peerty goood. This is all from MY past/current situation(s), so i may be a little off.
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: 02-16-08
Posts: 8,405
Likes: 0
From: Fairfield, CA/Travis AFB, CA
heres info on scavenging http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scavenging_(automotive)
Well there goes your exhaust velocity. If I was an na 2.2 and I wanted some 3 inch tubing in my exhaust I'd want it to be as far from he head as possible. Though honestly I wouldnt want it at all.
Agree, 3" is probably going to be worse than the stock piping. Waste of money IMO, but he didn't want to listen to people in the beginning of the thread so why would he listen now. Ignorance is bliss...
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
You do not understand fluid flow.... Bigger is not always better!
Last edited by Staged07SS; Jul 21, 2011 at 11:44 AM.
Have you modified anything else since you ran the 15.5? Make sure you post slip-slip so we can see the comparison of full runs...



