Can 2.2s take more than 10 psi 's
It's all about CFM not PSI, unless you're talking about the actual intake or manifold.
they would break at a certain HP level, not a psi level. i would say it can probably take 320-330bhp, so maybe 275whp, however no one has really ventured up there on a stock bottom end, nor could i say how long they would last at those power levels. the actual psi level will be dependent upon the compressor. I have no idea how much power 10psi would be from your turbo, so i cant really answer the question in terms of psi. I will say this though: your ghost icon is awesome. I need a hunterKiller hydralisk icon
^^Ya I forgot to add that in there about the compression in the question, i was at work and so tired cause I worked 16 hours last night. Also I just purchased my new rods and pistons with an 891 ratio so I can push more.
Hell Ya! Ghost is the most bad ass unit there is! lol NUKES man
I know Im jacking my own thread but hows the car situation?
now back to our featured present question...........
Hell Ya! Ghost is the most bad ass unit there is! lol NUKES man
I know Im jacking my own thread but hows the car situation?
now back to our featured present question...........
I'm going to run 15psi on my m62, as far as how much psi ur engine can take no one knows, yes to much pressure is a problem, air enters the engine already compressed, than it's compressed more, to much initial compression could **** the pistons up
guys, psi from a M62 and PSI from a turbo are NOT comparable.
Its all about the hydralisks tho dude.. ghosts are badass, but mass hydras own all.
as fr the car...the car is fine, the ticket situation is looking ok, but very expensive (im almost $3k in the hole for attorney expenses), but it wasnt impounded or anything so i can still drive around.
I would upgrade to the 2.4 manifold tho. flows better and is stronger, and its only like a hundred bucks? maybe two hundred
Its all about the hydralisks tho dude.. ghosts are badass, but mass hydras own all.
as fr the car...the car is fine, the ticket situation is looking ok, but very expensive (im almost $3k in the hole for attorney expenses), but it wasnt impounded or anything so i can still drive around.
I would upgrade to the 2.4 manifold tho. flows better and is stronger, and its only like a hundred bucks? maybe two hundred
guys, psi from a M62 and PSI from a turbo are NOT comparable.
Its all about the hydralisks tho dude.. ghosts are badass, but mass hydras own all.
as fr the car...the car is fine, the ticket situation is looking ok, but very expensive (im almost $3k in the hole for attorney expenses), but it wasnt impounded or anything so i can still drive around.
I would upgrade to the 2.4 manifold tho. flows better and is stronger, and its only like a hundred bucks? maybe two hundred
Its all about the hydralisks tho dude.. ghosts are badass, but mass hydras own all.
as fr the car...the car is fine, the ticket situation is looking ok, but very expensive (im almost $3k in the hole for attorney expenses), but it wasnt impounded or anything so i can still drive around.
I would upgrade to the 2.4 manifold tho. flows better and is stronger, and its only like a hundred bucks? maybe two hundred
Thats good, next time this all happens again have your dad say "I didn't know he took the car out" and end of story no one get completely screwed.
I just wanted to know if the engine would handle more pressure with new pistons thicker gasket sets
right around 15psi, its going to debate on blowing or not. You might get lucky and even push up beyond that.
the 2.2 plastic intake mani is 2 pieces. the 2.4 is a solid piece. In theory, the solid should with hold more pressure, since theres no fault line so to speak.
Good luck though!
Im not in reference to the hp it can support, but more so the pressure.
right around 15psi, its going to debate on blowing or not. You might get lucky and even push up beyond that.
the 2.2 plastic intake mani is 2 pieces. the 2.4 is a solid piece. In theory, the solid should with hold more pressure, since theres no fault line so to speak.
Good luck though!
right around 15psi, its going to debate on blowing or not. You might get lucky and even push up beyond that.
the 2.2 plastic intake mani is 2 pieces. the 2.4 is a solid piece. In theory, the solid should with hold more pressure, since theres no fault line so to speak.
Good luck though!
guys, psi from a M62 and PSI from a turbo are NOT comparable.
Its all about the hydralisks tho dude.. ghosts are badass, but mass hydras own all.
as fr the car...the car is fine, the ticket situation is looking ok, but very expensive (im almost $3k in the hole for attorney expenses), but it wasnt impounded or anything so i can still drive around.
I would upgrade to the 2.4 manifold tho. flows better and is stronger, and its only like a hundred bucks? maybe two hundred
Its all about the hydralisks tho dude.. ghosts are badass, but mass hydras own all.
as fr the car...the car is fine, the ticket situation is looking ok, but very expensive (im almost $3k in the hole for attorney expenses), but it wasnt impounded or anything so i can still drive around.
I would upgrade to the 2.4 manifold tho. flows better and is stronger, and its only like a hundred bucks? maybe two hundred
psi is..psi.
10 psi from a turbo, is the same amount of pressure from 10psi from a supercharger.
The only difference is air flow.
But PRESSURE is the same.
If you are saying 1psi of a turbo makes (ex.) 10hp per psi. and 1psi from the supercharger makes say (ex.) 5hp per psi. Your right in the aspect that psi doesnt mean the same hp between the 2.
10psi from a HUGE turbo wont make the same power as 10psi from a baby turbo.
However, pressure wise its all the same.
How so?
psi is..psi.
10 psi from a turbo, is the same amount of pressure from 10psi from a supercharger.
The only difference is air flow.
But PRESSURE is the same.
If you are saying 1psi of a turbo makes (ex.) 10hp per psi. and 1psi from the supercharger makes say (ex.) 5hp per psi. Your right in the aspect that psi doesnt mean the same hp between the 2.
10psi from a HUGE turbo wont make the same power as 10psi from a baby turbo.
However, pressure wise its all the same.
psi is..psi.
10 psi from a turbo, is the same amount of pressure from 10psi from a supercharger.
The only difference is air flow.
But PRESSURE is the same.
If you are saying 1psi of a turbo makes (ex.) 10hp per psi. and 1psi from the supercharger makes say (ex.) 5hp per psi. Your right in the aspect that psi doesnt mean the same hp between the 2.
10psi from a HUGE turbo wont make the same power as 10psi from a baby turbo.
However, pressure wise its all the same.
BTW, burrow > irradiate

mass hydras and lings with a little strike force of 12 guardians and 12 mutas and im set to rape anyone
Last week I turned it down to 13 psi.
Interceptor gauge shows 242 Net hp @ 6350 rpm's
There was a person here who ran the GT2860RS on his 2.2 at it's max. of 25 psi with forged internals using the canned SCT tune that comes with the Garrett Alpha Kit.
Was that you or do you know who this person was?
who the hell did or would do that? I highly doubt that tune would provide the fuel needed at those power levels...what injectors come with that kit anyway? Probably would run out of injector too if they're only 32#ers
I tried to search for the thread where he posted about this but I can't find it
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: 02-08-08
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville/Linden, NC/Myrtle Beach, SC
dawg why didnt you ask me this question....
as soon as i change out my intake manifold im going to bump the boost up to 18-24psi
as soon as i change out my intake manifold im going to bump the boost up to 18-24psi
Last edited by mrsilent13; May 24, 2009 at 08:16 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sl0wbaltSS
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
18
Nov 21, 2018 11:11 PM



