2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

cat-back exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 11:49 PM
  #1  
kloppster's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 05-31-07
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: denver, pa
cat-back exhaust

im going on tuesday to an exhaust shop to get 2.5" exhaust piping to go along with my magnaflow muffler and was wondering i should go with straight pipe or not?
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 11:53 PM
  #2  
M-Dub's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-19-05
Posts: 9,704
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Don't do 2.5" it is unneccessary for you!

Run 2.25" it is a better mix for you, unless you have descent mods! And unless you are going into the "FART" wars with local hondas do not go straight pipe keep the resonator, and muffler!
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 11:53 PM
  #3  
Jn2's Avatar
Jn2
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-04-07
Posts: 7,791
Likes: 3
From: Texas
it'll be pretty loud if you delete the cat, but save some money over putting in a high-flow one...i say if you wanna take the cat out, do it
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 12:13 AM
  #4  
kloppster's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 05-31-07
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: denver, pa
im not taking out the cat im just getting new pipe from where the downpipe connects to the tailpipe back

does anyone know what the size pipe i have now as stock compared to what i want to put in?

Last edited by kloppster; Sep 9, 2007 at 12:13 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 12:17 AM
  #5  
M-Dub's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-19-05
Posts: 9,704
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
When I had my 05 LS, it was like 2" and dipped into like 1.75" over the rear axle or something to that effect. I put 2.25" on my 05 with an HKS (fart cannon style) and it had a noticable increase in performance!
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 12:25 AM
  #6  
SilverBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-06
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
From: Hopewell Jct.
i believe the stock piping is a 1 7/8" and yea, do a 2.25 and i would highly recomend against a straight exaust, i have a manifold back exaust, CA downpipe with cat, and a 2.25 inch DC sport exaust and my car is LOUD
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 12:39 AM
  #7  
kloppster's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 05-31-07
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: denver, pa
the reason why i would go with 2.5" was because most of the cat-back exhaust kits are 2.5" so i figured i would go with that
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 12:43 AM
  #8  
M-Dub's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-19-05
Posts: 9,704
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
THe catbacks for the 2.2 liter are usually 2.25"

Get the GMPP Catback it's 2.25" piping! Most of the 2.5" catbacks are actually for the 2.4 and SS/SC!

Seriously though, just do 2.25" it's plenty big unless you are planning on going with some bewst!
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 12:46 AM
  #9  
kloppster's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 05-31-07
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: denver, pa
would it hurt it at all by going with 2.5 instead of 2.25?
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 12:49 AM
  #10  
M-Dub's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-19-05
Posts: 9,704
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
You'll just loose ALOT of lower end power! Running 2.25" will be a better balance of low end power and high end increases!

If you want to run 2.5" go ahead you seem to really want to (but there is no reason to!)... It's just overkill for a stock 2.2l!

if you check my mod list in my sig... and I'm ONLY running 2.5" piping! You don't need it!

Last edited by M-Dub; Sep 9, 2007 at 12:49 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 12:49 AM
  #11  
Bika's Avatar
Fail Less.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-08-05
Posts: 5,677
Likes: 1
From: Brookfield
you will lose some low-end torque with 2.5" thats all it will hurt
technically you would gain that power later in the rpm range, but your car will never rev high enough to see those gains.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 12:52 AM
  #12  
kloppster's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 05-31-07
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: denver, pa
ok seems fair enough so i'll just have to go with 2.25 cause i dont wanna lose any low end torque
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 12:53 AM
  #13  
M-Dub's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-19-05
Posts: 9,704
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by kloppster
ok seems fair enough so i'll just have to go with 2.25 cause i dont wanna lose any low end torque

Atta' boy! Get yourself an intake too, and it'll sound even better!
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 12:54 AM
  #14  
roccityroller's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-27-06
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
post videos when it's done.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 12:56 AM
  #15  
kloppster's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 05-31-07
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: denver, pa
ok i'll take a video and i already have a k&n intake so im all set up there
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 12:57 AM
  #16  
M-Dub's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-19-05
Posts: 9,704
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Good deal! Enjoy
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 09:24 PM
  #17  
kloppster's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 05-31-07
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: denver, pa
well i got the new piping today and went with 2.25" and doesnt really sound much louder at idle but is definetly deeper and louder when u get on it and i tried a 0-60 on my dash hawk and now it was about .4-.5 seconds faster so definetly worth it
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 11:01 PM
  #18  
Out1aw's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Good choice on keeping a muffler and smaller piping on an N/A 2.2. A low compression 4-cylinder such as the 2.2 needs that pressure and smaller diameter piping to keep the flow and velocity going well in the exhaust system. Big pipes and no mufflers on these Hondas you see driving around with just bolt-ons are actually hurting themselves with that modification.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 09:15 PM
  #19  
marin661's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-14-07
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: pittsfield MA
$

about how much did it cost to get the custom piping? was it alot cheaper to go with that then some of the exhaust like dc sports or magnaflow?
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 10:42 PM
  #20  
kloppster's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 05-31-07
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: denver, pa
well i already had the magnaflow muffler which only cost me $120 and for the tubing that only cost me $65 so i made out great as far as price compared to just buying one premade
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 10:51 PM
  #21  
marin661's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-14-07
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: pittsfield MA
Thats awesome do you still get a good hp/tq increase? btw i like the muffler in your pic
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 11:09 PM
  #22  
kloppster's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 05-31-07
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: denver, pa
i havent tested it yet on the track but it feels like it made a hp increase and it doesnt seem to be slower of the start. and thanks i love my muffler but i wish it would be a lil louder
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 11:35 PM
  #23  
Novajoe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-18-06
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville AL
Originally Posted by kloppster
i havent tested it yet on the track but it feels like it made a hp increase and it doesnt seem to be slower of the start. and thanks i love my muffler but i wish it would be a lil louder
did the shop doing your exhaust use a mandrel bender? Or does it look kinda kinked in at the bends.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 11:44 PM
  #24  
hungryhip-ccp's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 05-31-07
Posts: 4,339
Likes: 0
From: SoCal, Lancaster
Originally Posted by Out1aw
Good choice on keeping a muffler and smaller piping on an N/A 2.2. A low compression 4-cylinder such as the 2.2 needs that pressure and smaller diameter piping to keep the flow and velocity going well in the exhaust system. Big pipes and no mufflers on these Hondas you see driving around with just bolt-ons are actually hurting themselves with that modification.
i agree i have hondas with straight pipe trying to race me all the time they drive by and rev there car (loud as hell) and i have kept my cat and resonator and muffler and my car is quite and faster... when i took my cat out my car was way to loud and was .2 .3 of a second slower in the quarter mile you made the right choice!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
KMO43
Front Page News
33
Jan 12, 2016 12:01 AM
hacadacalopolis
Parts
8
Oct 28, 2015 06:09 PM
patooyee
2.4L LE5 Performance Tech
50
Oct 15, 2015 05:11 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
Sep 27, 2015 08:53 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:20 PM.