2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

Cisco2.2build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 09:21 PM
  #51  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
Originally Posted by 08baltls
Jesus Christ. Im done arguing with this group of children here. Obviously, in the face of facts, none of you can concede that the stock pistons are fine up to at least 283 hp. This is typical of any forum so I have no idea why I thought that here would be any different, but f*ck... You guys really need to wrench on some more motors before you start spouting off the sh*t that read as being golden. Yall are about as bad as Christians saying that their perogative is right and everyone else is wrong. So what ever. Im out.

OP do some research for yourself and make your own decisions. Dont just do what ever these people tell you to do because its what they have done cause all you'll do is waste money.
Glad to see you resort to name calling and insults instead of ever answering all of my actual questions relating to the discussion.


LMFAO at needing to wrench on more motors and not just spouting the **** we read as golden........you continue to use ONE tests results as the standard for every 2.2L build, which is even more hilarious when you refuse to acknowledge that the very people who came up with your magic 283hp go on to say to install FORGED pistons in 2.2s destined for 250hp or more. SO you hold one thing they say to be the truth but ignore their recommendations......
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 09:29 PM
  #52  
soundjunky's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 05-26-09
Posts: 13,656
Likes: 47
From: Calgary, Alberta
Originally Posted by 08baltls
... none of you can concede that the stock pistons are fine up to at least 283 hp.
umm, what?

Originally Posted by 08baltls
yall obviously need to read more thoroughly...
quoted for the sake of stressing unintended humor.

I clearly agreed with the facts in your last post.

Originally Posted by 08baltls
Yall are about as bad as Christians saying that their perogative is right and everyone else is wrong. So what ever. Im out.
I find this quote funny in light of your having starting off this post using the Lord's name in vain - which in essence is passively acknowledging his reverence ~ in a mocking/blasphemous fashion...
(or did you not even realize what you did?)



I guess you were not good afterall?





BTW:

Perogative:
pre·rog·a·tive/ priˈrägətiv /
  1. A right or privilege exclusive to a particular individual or class.
  2. A faculty or property distinguishing a person or class.

Should you maybe replace the word 'perogative' with something akin to;
"the new testament is infallibly God's word, and new covenant - replacing the old covenant;
and that there is only one way to eternal life"?
because if that's the jist of what you were shooting for, I wouldn't argue you... again.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 09:29 PM
  #53  
Mr.N00bLaR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 05-30-07
Posts: 2,560
Likes: 0
From: WNY
Originally Posted by 08baltls
Jesus Christ. Im done arguing with this group of children here. Obviously, in the face of facts, none of you can concede that the stock pistons are fine up to at least 283 hp. This is typical of any forum so I have no idea why I thought that here would be any different, but f*ck... You guys really need to wrench on some more motors before you start spouting off the sh*t that read as being golden. Yall are about as bad as Christians saying that their perogative is right and everyone else is wrong. So what ever. Im out.

OP do some research for yourself and make your own decisions. Dont just do what ever these people tell you to do because its what they have done cause all you'll do is waste money.
I'd bet that if you looked around EF enough, you would find some sad stories that do not agree with this...lol.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33 AM.