cobalt 2.2 vs ss 2.4 cobalt - Cobalt SS Network



2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque
Technical Discussions ONLY!

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-30-2006, 09:01 PM   #1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: 06-04-06
Location: miami
Posts: 1,146
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Question cobalt 2.2 vs ss 2.4 cobalt

is there that big of a difference in their preformance
slick54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2006, 09:15 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: 04-30-06
Location: Jacksonville NC
Posts: 294
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
2.4 has about 30 h/p diff plus more TQ. enough to squezze by ya on the street.
Cman06sssc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2006, 09:22 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 02-27-06
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 926
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i ran one on the street awhile ago, it was auto, i was stick it was pretty even, but i put about a car on him off the line and then he pulled me after that
roccityroller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2006, 09:39 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 10-08-05
Location: Oxford,MA
Posts: 900
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
good to know my buddy is trying to get a 2.4 i think with my intake and exhaust and the fact he weighs like 100 pound more than me it should be close
Clmbngfrk18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2006, 10:00 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
g5mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-17-06
Location: Moncton Newbrunswick Can.
Posts: 17,268
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clmbngfrk18
good to know my buddy is trying to get a 2.4 i think with my intake and exhaust and the fact he weighs like 100 pound more than me it should be close
When your bud is not looking put some weight in his trunk
g5mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2006, 11:05 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: 12-02-05
Location: Wichita Kansas
Posts: 376
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I ran a stock 2.4, man, against my 2.2 man, I/E and I hung with him. We shut down at 95 and his front bumper was at my drivers door. The 2.4 may have 26 more hp stock for stock, but the torque difference is minimal, 155 VS 163. But as far as stock for stock, same tranny setup and based on sheer power, 2.4 is better, that's why it's called an SS...
1SloBowtie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2006, 11:13 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
avro206's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-17-04
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,994
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
way more top end power on the 2.4L. If its the same trans 2.2 vs 2.4L its no contest. Not real far off but still no contest
avro206 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2006, 12:00 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-21-06
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 5,565
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
off idle, the 2.4 actually makes less power than the 2.2 once teh VVT starts doing it's magic the motor really comes alive. if you wind out a 2.4 it just feels a lot "sportier" than a 2.2 also, coil on plug ignition, forged interals, few other goodies, it's just an overall more performance based engine. with that said, the 2.2 is a lot quieter and a hair smoother.
joeworkstoohard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2006, 12:40 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 09-17-05
Location: Greensburg, PA
Posts: 1,667
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I own a bone-stock 2.2 and have driven a 2.4 with Injen CAI, both auto. The 2.4 does have more top-end, but it's not like going from a 2.2 to a 2.0SC. Off-the-line, they're close, but the 2.4 will pull on the 2.2 at about 1/8 mile, I'd guess. I'd like to run them against each other AT THE TRACK to see 'exactly' how they compare, though.
BlueThunder2006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2006, 09:24 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
avro206's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-17-04
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,994
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeworkstoohard
off idle, the 2.4 actually makes less power than the 2.2 once teh VVT starts doing it's magic the motor really comes alive. if you wind out a 2.4 it just feels a lot "sportier" than a 2.2 also, coil on plug ignition, forged interals, few other goodies, it's just an overall more performance based engine. with that said, the 2.2 is a lot quieter and a hair smoother.
I'll disagree with that--the torque curve on the 2.4 is higher at lower rpms then the 2.2--according to GM dyno graphs
avro206 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2006, 10:35 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 04-01-06
Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yep, the dyno graphs tell the story between the two much better than comparing peak torque. If you compare the peak torque ratings for both, it seems like little difference in 155lbs-ft vs 163lbs-ft.

Looking at the dyno graph, we can see that the 2.4 starts making 150lbs-ft at an early 2400rpm and stays above 150lbs-ft all the way till 5800rpm. The 2.2 hits 150lbs-ft at 3800rpm and only stays there till 5100rpm.

Also looking at the 2.4 plot, it does make it's peak hp at 6200 but it doesn't spiral downward right after that. It keeps making power all the way to redline.

The only real difference between the two is the VVT. I wouldn't be surprised to see VVT on all Ecotecs in a couple years.
06G5GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2006, 02:57 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 10-08-05
Location: Oxford,MA
Posts: 900
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by g5mike
When your bud is not looking put some weight in his trunk

lol ill just get him to drive with his girlfriend lol
Clmbngfrk18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2006, 03:08 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-21-06
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 5,565
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by avro206
I'll disagree with that--the torque curve on the 2.4 is higher at lower rpms then the 2.2--according to GM dyno graphs


I am just going on what I've heard.
joeworkstoohard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2006, 09:21 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: AZ
Posts: 7,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
it should be close but he should still pull on you, you're gonna need just a little more power to actually outpower one and not just beat the driver.

i think u'd have alot better chance with a good header too
IonNinja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2006, 01:19 AM   #15
New Member
 
Join Date: 05-17-06
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Honestly he should pull on you but if you do have intake an exhaust and know how to really drive a 5SPD it should be dead even. You could possibly beat him.
NewCobalt06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2006, 01:47 AM   #16
I'm old school
 
Halfcent's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-16-05
Location: Nashville
Posts: 6,901
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
One thing I noticed above...

The stock automatic trans in these two cars does have one difference.

The SS model automatic has a higher ratio differential. The idea being to take the extra power and spin the wheels a little faster at the same RPM.
Halfcent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2006, 10:26 AM   #17
New Member
 
Join Date: 11-15-05
Location: quebec
Posts: 184
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
yesterday I had the chance to drive all the cobalt models(ls,lt,SS,SS/Sc with stage 2 and K&N) and after these tests,I would say that the SS/SC is totally in an other world but when it come to make the diference between the 2.2 and the 2.4(both with auto),there is not a huge difference.The major diff between to is on handling but for the rest with my 250$ springs and my 17' wheels im happy with my car.
qcpursuit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2006, 10:44 AM   #18
Member
 
Join Date: 01-23-05
Location: texas
Posts: 329
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halfcent
One thing I noticed above...

The stock automatic trans in these two cars does have one difference.

The SS model automatic has a higher ratio differential. The idea being to take the extra power and spin the wheels a little faster at the same RPM.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but the final drive ratio is the same in both ss and non cars that use the 4t45e. It's 3.63 for the final drive
dnbguy86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2006, 11:36 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
avro206's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-17-04
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,994
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halfcent
One thing I noticed above...

The stock automatic trans in these two cars does have one difference.

The SS model automatic has a higher ratio differential. The idea being to take the extra power and spin the wheels a little faster at the same RPM.
even if it did---it cannot be at the same RPM with different gears.
avro206 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2006, 05:11 PM   #20
I'm old school
 
Halfcent's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-16-05
Location: Nashville
Posts: 6,901
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnbguy86
Sorry to burst your bubble, but the final drive ratio is the same in both ss and non cars that use the 4t45e. It's 3.63 for the final drive
Ya know, you totally did burst my bubble. I confused the manual with the auto. I went back and checked, and the 4T45E Automatics are in fact completely identical across all the Cobalts. The manual on the base/ls/lt models however has 3.84 ratio while the SS has a 3.91 and the SS/SC has a 4.05. You win.
Halfcent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2006, 07:27 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
avro206's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-17-04
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,994
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halfcent
Ya know, you totally did burst my bubble. I confused the manual with the auto. I went back and checked, and the 4T45E Automatics are in fact completely identical across all the Cobalts. The manual on the base/ls/lt models however has 3.84 ratio while the SS has a 3.91 and the SS/SC has a 4.05. You win.
I'll burst it again!

a 5 speed F23s have 3.84 ratio. I have said this numerous times before but Chevrolet.com has lots of errors on it. Go the gmcanada.com for the stright goods
avro206 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2006, 07:47 PM   #22
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: 06-27-06
Location: indiana
Posts: 1,399
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
No Not Really But The 2.4 Has Some More High End Power And Torque,but Not Much...i Have Raced 2 A Auto And A 5 Speed And I Beat Them Both The 5 Speed Is A Little Faster Than The Auto But Not Much,so Basically A 06 5 Speed Ls Should Beat A 06 5 Speed Ss Coupe Any Day,its A Weight Thing The Ss May Have More Power But It Has More Weight Than A Ls Alot So There
bykryder83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2006, 08:31 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
g5mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-17-06
Location: Moncton Newbrunswick Can.
Posts: 17,268
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bykryder83
No Not Really But The 2.4 Has Some More High End Power And Torque,but Not Much...i Have Raced 2 A Auto And A 5 Speed And I Beat Them Both The 5 Speed Is A Little Faster Than The Auto But Not Much,so Basically A 06 5 Speed Ls Should Beat A 06 5 Speed Ss Coupe Any Day,its A Weight Thing The Ss May Have More Power But It Has More Weight Than A Ls Alot So There
Ive driven both and disagree
g5mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2006, 09:33 PM   #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 04-01-06
Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
26 hp more than makes up for any weight difference between the two. You caught a guy that couldn't drive. Anybody that test drove both before buying knows this.
06G5GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2006, 10:23 PM   #25
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: 04-13-04
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bykryder83
No Not Really But The 2.4 Has Some More High End Power And Torque,but Not Much...i Have Raced 2 A Auto And A 5 Speed And I Beat Them Both The 5 Speed Is A Little Faster Than The Auto But Not Much,so Basically A 06 5 Speed Ls Should Beat A 06 5 Speed Ss Coupe Any Day,its A Weight Thing The Ss May Have More Power But It Has More Weight Than A Ls Alot So There

that 5-speed SS driver couldn't drive then. I can see you beating an auto those have been known to run a 16-15.5. But not a five speed sorry best i've seen one ls do is a 15.6 ,Several 2.4's have done low 15's, like 15.2ish.
Brandon97Z is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2.4 ecotec to 2.2 ecotec swap Barkleyj605 2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 4 10-24-2015 12:07 AM
New Member - Big Problem Tupp Problems/Service/Maintenance 5 09-29-2015 11:07 PM
2.4 w/oil cooler to 2.4 w/o oil cooler red9 2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 2 09-17-2015 06:20 AM
Good bye Cobalt... Parts to come OrngBalt General Cobalt 10 09-16-2015 07:45 PM
2006 pcm and bcm swap to 2007 BettyBlue2.2 2.2L L61 Performance Tech 4 09-10-2015 08:49 PM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:47 AM.