2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

hp loss thru drivetrain/powertrain?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 04:29 AM
  #1  
o3nisoaso3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-20-07
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
From: Irwin, Pa (S of Pittsburgh)
hp loss thru drivetrain/powertrain?!?

I dont know if this has been brought up yet or not but i am lost of this

Stock 2.2L ECOTEC - 136 HP @ 5500 RPM – Torque 139 lbf/ft@4000 RPM
Garrett Turbo Stage 2 – 198HP@5000 RPM – Torque 219 lbf/ft@4000 RPM


the stock numbers are only 9 hp and 16 ft lbs/tq loss thru a stock drivetrain/powertrain?

as far as i knew fwd loss was 10% with upgraded fly, and maybe some other mods and roughly 15-18% from factory, some i have seen 20% loss on dynos (friends cars and yes stock)

so therefore 145flyhp = 130.5fwhp at best, 123.25-118.9fwhp with the normal 15-18% loss
AND
to have 155flytq = 139.5fwtq at best (matches garretts dyno), 131.75-127.1fwtq with the normal 15-18% loss

this just makes me wonder if gms ratings arent exact but just an estimate from the cavy to the balt (since the balt has no power steering pump, its electronic) or was garretts dyno not accurate?

now i bring this up because i took a second look at those wheel numbers and thot they were a lil too high for how much they claim from the motor...

i saw a post on here before that cobalts are 15% (cant remember where, if someone knows please post) but that would put us at 123.25whp/131.75wtq not the 136/139 garrett posted on their dyno. so is it gm or garrett that is off?

anyone with any input please... i just posted this for a conclusion and i know i will be corrected with something i posted so please correct me

so somebody please explain this to me or does anyone have a dyno of a stock 2.2?
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 04:39 AM
  #2  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
i think garrett is off, as most of the dynos ive seen are in a 120-129whp range
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 04:45 AM
  #3  
o3nisoaso3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-20-07
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
From: Irwin, Pa (S of Pittsburgh)
yea, thats what i thot. i just kept thinking that if garrett were right we would have more hp/tq than what gm is claiming and that would be nice but i doubted it being true lol

136whp = 156.4flyhp with 15% loss and 139wtq = 159.85flyhp if you use garretts numbers. i mean its not a dramatic difference 11.4hp/4.85tq but hey ppl buy cai to get that lol

and whose to say if they are high balling the stock numbers that they couldnt highball the turbo kit numbers... even tho i talked to adam hahn and he said that the turbo numbers seemed low
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 04:47 AM
  #4  
REIGN SS's Avatar
Original Hayden Fanatic
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-06-06
Posts: 33,169
Likes: 1
From: Dayton, O HI O
my buddy dynod 133/139 on his bone stock LS

ill see if he still has the dyno sheet

Last edited by REIGN SS; Sep 26, 2007 at 04:52 AM. Reason: sorry # was off
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 04:50 AM
  #5  
o3nisoaso3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-20-07
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
From: Irwin, Pa (S of Pittsburgh)
hmm... did it say how much he had at the fly?

Originally Posted by REIGNftSOLDIER
my buddy dynod 139/139 on his bone stock LS

ill see if he still has the dyno sheet

i believe it, but with my friend not having a power steering pump in his civic he gained about 8hp/9tq to the wheels and that made me wonder...


what did he run in the 1/4? he ever run it?

Last edited by o3nisoaso3; Sep 26, 2007 at 04:51 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 04:53 AM
  #6  
REIGN SS's Avatar
Original Hayden Fanatic
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-06-06
Posts: 33,169
Likes: 1
From: Dayton, O HI O
He never ran it in the quarter, it got totalled a few months back.

I was slightly mistaken it was 133/139, here is his thread & video about it:
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-2l-l61-performance-tech-45/dynoed-my-car-today-36008/
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 04:54 AM
  #7  
o3nisoaso3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-20-07
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
From: Irwin, Pa (S of Pittsburgh)
yea well 133 is less than a 10% loss unless that was tq/hp

awe man, thats too bad for him

Last edited by o3nisoaso3; Sep 26, 2007 at 04:54 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 12:53 PM
  #8  
mlcroy20's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-20-05
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
I'm trying to get my Dyno Data files back but when I had them done (prior to cpu crash) back in 05 with my balt completely stock (right off showroom floor) it was 131whp/137tq. I just got a bunch of stuff installed and I'll try to get a dyno next week. I wanted to do a piece by piece dyno and install, to see the value of each piece, but at $60 a shot, I just didn't have the money to do it.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 06:08 PM
  #9  
o3nisoaso3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-20-07
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
From: Irwin, Pa (S of Pittsburgh)
hey REIGN i honestly think that these numbers are low for MY car... my buddies civic dynoed 121.53/128.34 and he cant keep up with me for **** and hes a damn good driver (autox with me) so im gonna have a friend take my car to the dyno (hybridynamic www.hybridynamics.com) and see what itll put down... and i havent put an intake/exhaust or any lil bolt on to add hp/tq to my car... yet

ill videotape it too
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 06:11 PM
  #10  
halfj99's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-18-06
Posts: 4,883
Likes: 0
From: Madison,WI
all that 10% or w/e powertrain loss is just ricer math , if you want to know accurately, you have to dyno your own car, as every car is a little diffrent
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 03:36 AM
  #11  
o3nisoaso3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-20-07
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
From: Irwin, Pa (S of Pittsburgh)
Originally Posted by mlcroy20
I'm trying to get my Dyno Data files back but when I had them done (prior to cpu crash) back in 05 with my balt completely stock (right off showroom floor) it was 131whp/137tq. I just got a bunch of stuff installed and I'll try to get a dyno next week. I wanted to do a piece by piece dyno and install, to see the value of each piece, but at $60 a shot, I just didn't have the money to do it.

$60 damn, i dont think there is anywhere near me that is that cheap. i think just to get on a fwd dyno is minimum $100 plus you have to pay an extra of the time that your on it so maybe like $150 at the minimum around me (as far as ive seen)
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 03:56 PM
  #12  
hobbie2k's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-08-07
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis, MN
Originally Posted by halfj99
all that 10% or w/e powertrain loss is just ricer math , if you want to know accurately, you have to dyno your own car, as every car is a little diffrent
Also, temperature and pressure changes can have a dramatic effect. And different dynos give different results. There are a lot of variables.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 12:58 PM
  #13  
mlcroy20's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-20-05
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
they are normally a $95 but I run a job placement division and we did some recruitment work for a shop that does dynos up here last month and the guy is cutting me a deal.. I'm actually going next week...
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 01:00 PM
  #14  
WickedSS2005's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 2
From: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
Originally Posted by REIGN SS
my buddy dynod 133/139 on his bone stock LS

ill see if he still has the dyno sheet
For anyone that doubts this, I was there with him during the dyno run. He has the chart to prove it, unless it was in his balt when he totaled it
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 05:08 PM
  #15  
o3nisoaso3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-20-07
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
From: Irwin, Pa (S of Pittsburgh)
Originally Posted by WickedSS2005
For anyone that doubts this, I was there with him during the dyno run. He has the chart to prove it, unless it was in his balt when he totaled it

he showed me the dynos, even tho i didnt doubt him
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ernnyyes
Problems/Service/Maintenance
5
Oct 2, 2015 05:16 PM
twilson380
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
6
Sep 14, 2015 10:52 AM
Adam144
Problems/Service/Maintenance
5
Sep 3, 2015 07:48 PM
soundjunky
Problems/Service/Maintenance
4
Sep 3, 2015 01:18 PM
717ssbalt
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
5
Sep 1, 2015 10:51 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:07 AM.