2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

For the mechanics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 09:22 AM
  #1  
StrongIslandBalter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-05-08
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
For the mechanics

A 2.2 cobalt ls with a kand n typhoon kit, jet chip stage 2, weisco forged pustons, comp cams, 2.4 mani swap, magnaflow exhaust, headers, msd ignition, bosch +4 plugs ,i wanna see what the most hpi can get w/o forced induction no flaming im a newb
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 09:25 AM
  #2  
Sunburst_SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-08-06
Posts: 2,395
Likes: 3
From: Charlotte, NC
bosch +4's are crap.....and don't bother with the jet stage 2, get a tune written for the build. Depending on your year, trifecta can tune the car
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 09:30 AM
  #3  
originaladrian's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-22-06
Posts: 8,396
Likes: 0
From: S.FL
so whts ur question?

how much those mods will yeild? or u have them?

or whats the max u can get NA?

...
...
...
proof reading ftw
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 09:35 AM
  #4  
shabodah's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-21-06
Posts: 2,270
Likes: 1
From: Midwest
The more spark plug terminal in the combustion chamber, the more likely detonation is to occur. There is no reason to run splitfire or bosch +2 or bosch +4 plugs on modern engines.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 11:15 AM
  #5  
StrongIslandBalter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-05-08
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
idealy my question really is whats the most i can get from my 2.2 before turning to forced induction. I read on pulstar spark plugs that just for those alone it will add 5 hp, but yes what the max i can get on the 2.2 and what does the trifecta tune do or add?
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 11:25 AM
  #6  
originaladrian's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-22-06
Posts: 8,396
Likes: 0
From: S.FL
at this point im just going to turn you to the GM build book for the ecotec. have fun. search
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 12:19 PM
  #7  
Sw4y1313's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-25-06
Posts: 1,860
Likes: 0
From: USAG Stuttgart, GER
ok, you have a bit of the right idea but honestly look how much its going to cost you to do that. replace the jet chip with a real tune, the cams for a decent turbo like a EvoIII 16g, and a turbo exhaust manifold for the 2.4intake mani. you then just need to spend a little more on piping and injectors and you have yourself a 200+whp cobalt with potential vs maybe a 180whp cobalt that's close to maxed out.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 12:26 PM
  #8  
shabodah's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-21-06
Posts: 2,270
Likes: 1
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by Sw4y1313
ok, you have a bit of the right idea but honestly look how much its going to cost you to do that. replace the jet chip with a real tune, the cams for a decent turbo like a EvoIII 16g, and a turbo exhaust manifold for the 2.4intake mani. you then just need to spend a little more on piping and injectors and you have yourself a 200+whp cobalt with potential vs maybe a 180whp cobalt that's close to maxed out.
I have to disagree. Although the performance of the 16g is adequate, it's reliability is not, though it is much better than the older turbos Mitsu used to use.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 12:39 PM
  #9  
Sw4y1313's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-25-06
Posts: 1,860
Likes: 0
From: USAG Stuttgart, GER
Originally Posted by shabodah
I have to disagree. Although the performance of the 16g is adequate, it's reliability is not, though it is much better than the older turbos Mitsu used to use.
its still a decent turbo and you really can't beat it for the price. it costs the same as the cams and brings a hell of a lot more power.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 12:51 PM
  #10  
shabodah's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-21-06
Posts: 2,270
Likes: 1
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by Sw4y1313
its still a decent turbo and you really can't beat it for the price. it costs the same as the cams and brings a hell of a lot more power.
buying cams for an ecotec is not something many people should bother with.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 01:06 PM
  #11  
zillaguy07's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 08-26-08
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Hebron, IN
Originally Posted by StrongIslandBalter
I read on pulstar spark plugs that just for those alone it will add 5 hp
I'd LOVE to see proof of that...those plugs are nothing more than a gimmick. The only good thing that might come from them is that since the plug is only gonna use one electrode at a time (it doesnt spark to all the electrodes at once) they MIGHT last longer.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 01:08 PM
  #12  
FASTL61's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 02-17-08
Posts: 4,209
Likes: 0
From: QC,AZ
bosch platinums and up have to much resistance so they will eventually blow out your ignition module or even the coil..pull those peices of **** out
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 01:17 PM
  #13  
StrongIslandBalter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-05-08
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
alritey then i had one of the guys above say 180 map hp on the ls 2.2 anyother opinions or suggestions on how to build a car to its max with out using forced induction
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 03:55 PM
  #14  
shabodah's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-21-06
Posts: 2,270
Likes: 1
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by StrongIslandBalter
alritey then i had one of the guys above say 180 map hp on the ls 2.2 anyother opinions or suggestions on how to build a car to its max with out using forced induction
The only way to make a small engine produce decent power is to rev it high. The higher the revs, the faster the rings wear out. This is an exponential increase, not a linear one.

What I'm saying is, long-term, it is FAR FAR more expensive to build a NA four cylinder than a FI'd one.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 04:55 PM
  #15  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
if your absolutely intent on it....neutral balance shafts, new valves 1mm larger, port the head, new valve springs/retainers, this means new headgasket, new head studs, new cams (comp stage II probably), lightweight crank pulley, 2.4l manifold, a fatty intake, and a tune....your talking about $2,000 in the head, another $350 for the balance shafts, another $300 for the crank, $400 on the cams, $300 on the tune, $250 on the intake, and w/e the head studs/gasket cost. upwards of $3600+ and youll see a little over 200hp...

not to mention install on those is a bitch, they all involve getting inside the engine...thats a lotta $$ for a professional install
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 05:04 PM
  #16  
tru2nrtt777's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-08-08
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville/Linden, NC/Myrtle Beach, SC
Originally Posted by StrongIslandBalter
I read on pulstar spark plugs that just for those alone it will add 5 hp
I have some beach front property in Kansas for you too.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 07:45 PM
  #17  
Sentry's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-25-07
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 0
From: East Texas
I would say just build you your engine a little bit and go turbo with tune.

If you wanna get technical, you can make your 2.2 500hp na, hell there's even a GM racing book that shows you exactly how, but like the other guy said, it's very expensive and not worth it.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 09:22 PM
  #18  
Spanky's Monkey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 09-09-06
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 1
From: Decatur, IL
Originally Posted by HunterKiller89
if your absolutely intent on it....neutral balance shafts, new valves 1mm larger, port the head, new valve springs/retainers, this means new headgasket, new head studs, new cams (comp stage II probably), lightweight crank pulley, 2.4l manifold, a fatty intake, and a tune....your talking about $2,000 in the head, another $350 for the balance shafts, another $300 for the crank, $400 on the cams, $300 on the tune, $250 on the intake, and w/e the head studs/gasket cost. upwards of $3600+ and youll see a little over 200hp...

not to mention install on those is a bitch, they all involve getting inside the engine...thats a lotta $$ for a professional install
QFT. and this is the very reason why i decided to go with a turbo build instead of a 200+ NA build with a 100 shot of juice.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 01:49 AM
  #19  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Spanky's Monkey
QFT. and this is the very reason why i decided to go with a turbo build instead of a 200+ NA build with a 100 shot of juice.
its why i just bought an M62 and intake manifold...ill be at over 220hp for $1500 + $300 for the tune....thats cheaper than just the head on the hypothetical NA cobalt above...
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 02:01 AM
  #20  
Jn2's Avatar
Jn2
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-04-07
Posts: 7,791
Likes: 3
From: Texas
n/a has it limits if its your D&D if i can get 150whp i'd be happy and call it a day :p
but if i was f/i, 220whp and i'd be happy
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 03:59 AM
  #21  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Jn2
n/a has it limits if its your D&D if i can get 150whp i'd be happy and call it a day :p
but if i was f/i, 220whp and i'd be happy
150whp is easy. Stroke it, and blueprint it, and get a 2.4l head, and whala, 150whp....
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 08:40 AM
  #22  
Spanky's Monkey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 09-09-06
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 1
From: Decatur, IL
the 2.4 manifold alone with a cai and exhaust nets 150hp at the wheels. with the tune you'll surpass that by a few horses. i figure a good setup should net 170hp+ to the wheels.

to put it in perspective i can spank my buddies 05 ser spec-v which on paper would mean i was putting out more at the crank then his 175hp.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 03:38 PM
  #23  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
Originally Posted by HunterKiller89
150whp is easy. Stroke it, and blueprint it, and get a 2.4l head, and whala, 150whp....
If after all that your only at 150hp, you truly are stroking it. Second why on earth would you put a 2.4 head on an L61? I/E and a good tune is all you need for 150hp
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RaginChopsuey
War Stories
16
Oct 27, 2015 01:27 PM
bigdogstokes16
Complete Cars
10
Oct 8, 2015 10:28 PM
Tupp
Problems/Service/Maintenance
5
Sep 29, 2015 11:07 PM
dieGone
Complete Cars
4
Sep 23, 2015 10:20 AM
ashalle2
Drivetrain
31
Sep 16, 2015 10:36 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 AM.