Serious thougths only
Serious thougths only
With all this talk about the 2.4 TB and manifold. Do you think that a tune for the TB with full bolt ons would be to much for stock injectors? And is re-pinning needed for the TB? IM about to order my tune and not sure if its worth getting the TB and possibly larger injectors for cheap ya know?
bumps
guys anything?
bumps
guys anything?
Last edited by boltedbalt; Dec 5, 2009 at 02:39 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
i have done all of this and more and i still would have been under the need for bigger injectors. I did them just because I didnt know and i would need them eventaually anyways.
You do have to make your own harness but its not too hard....honestly though if you arent doing much more to the vehichle (boost or serious build) then you wont need them.
as for the tb it does bring some of the lower end tq back that you loose with the intake mani. and you should not have to rewire anything, just have it tuned.
You do have to make your own harness but its not too hard....honestly though if you arent doing much more to the vehichle (boost or serious build) then you wont need them.
as for the tb it does bring some of the lower end tq back that you loose with the intake mani. and you should not have to rewire anything, just have it tuned.
so i guess what kinda WHP will I be looking at with all the mods in my sig + full exhaust the 2.4L TB and a trifecta tune? Im shooting for 160-170, and any ideas for some mounts or traction bars to put more power down; I dont want really bad vibs ya know?
hmmm is our stock exhaust mostly 2.25? and only 1.75 for part of it or am I measuring wrong?
bummmpppp
any words
bummmpppp
any words
Last edited by boltedbalt; Dec 9, 2009 at 01:11 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
hmm well thats a rather "grounding number" but thanks for the reality check, Maven do you have an opinnion on meth on NA cars? I'v been reading on it and some people have gained a decent amount of power but they were mostly V6's but I did find a RSX type S running it who saw some decent gains, is this appilcation something worth more research on?
Yes methanol injection works on NA cars.
Yeah pretty much MUST have a decent header to break 155, and 170 is almost certainly gonna require internal work or other expensive mods.
Yeah pretty much MUST have a decent header to break 155, and 170 is almost certainly gonna require internal work or other expensive mods.
hmm well thats a rather "grounding number" but thanks for the reality check, Maven do you have an opinnion on meth on NA cars? I'v been reading on it and some people have gained a decent amount of power but they were mostly V6's but I did find a RSX type S running it who saw some decent gains, is this appilcation something worth more research on?
i can def agree to that
it may not take much to get above 170 internals wise but it is def required
what kind of gains would be seen from meth on an n/a car in comparison to boosted?
another question on this subject maven
how hard would it be to do itb's on the balt? do they make an electronic itb setup that could work (with adaptation to the correct flange)? would adapting the actuator from the existing tb to move mult hard - linked itb's work? would you be required to go aftermarket for your ecu setup or is it feasible to adapt into current.
is it even worth it?
it may not take much to get above 170 internals wise but it is def required
what kind of gains would be seen from meth on an n/a car in comparison to boosted?
another question on this subject maven
how hard would it be to do itb's on the balt? do they make an electronic itb setup that could work (with adaptation to the correct flange)? would adapting the actuator from the existing tb to move mult hard - linked itb's work? would you be required to go aftermarket for your ecu setup or is it feasible to adapt into current.
is it even worth it?
Last edited by NWAE Cobalt; Dec 10, 2009 at 06:05 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
i can def agree to that
it may not take much to get above 170 internals wise but it is def required
what kind of gains would be seen from meth on an n/a car in comparison to boosted?
another question on this subject maven
how hard would it be to do itb's on the balt? do they make an electronic itb setup that could work (with adaptation to the correct flange)? would adapting the actuator from the existing tb to move mult hard - linked itb's work? would you be required to go aftermarket for your ecu setup or is it feasible to adapt into current.
is it even worth it?
it may not take much to get above 170 internals wise but it is def required
what kind of gains would be seen from meth on an n/a car in comparison to boosted?
another question on this subject maven
how hard would it be to do itb's on the balt? do they make an electronic itb setup that could work (with adaptation to the correct flange)? would adapting the actuator from the existing tb to move mult hard - linked itb's work? would you be required to go aftermarket for your ecu setup or is it feasible to adapt into current.
is it even worth it?
just thinking
cause i would LOVE to have ITB's, but really dont want the hassel of a standalone
itb's stands for individual throttle bodies
as in 1 tb per cyl
they are great for na due to throttle response and not having to suck all that air through all that piping. i believe the math says that for every 90* angle in an intake or exhaust, it is equal to 9 feet of straight pipe...and the more pipe you go through the more friction and loss of power...
all in all, more power, better throttle repsonse...all around better
as in 1 tb per cyl
they are great for na due to throttle response and not having to suck all that air through all that piping. i believe the math says that for every 90* angle in an intake or exhaust, it is equal to 9 feet of straight pipe...and the more pipe you go through the more friction and loss of power...
all in all, more power, better throttle repsonse...all around better
itb's stands for individual throttle bodies
as in 1 tb per cyl
they are great for na due to throttle response and not having to suck all that air through all that piping. i believe the math says that for every 90* angle in an intake or exhaust, it is equal to 9 feet of straight pipe...and the more pipe you go through the more friction and loss of power...
all in all, more power, better throttle repsonse...all around better
as in 1 tb per cyl
they are great for na due to throttle response and not having to suck all that air through all that piping. i believe the math says that for every 90* angle in an intake or exhaust, it is equal to 9 feet of straight pipe...and the more pipe you go through the more friction and loss of power...
all in all, more power, better throttle repsonse...all around better
if vince were able to figure out a way to adapt new sensors (or whatever needed to be done with them) into the mix, and you found a way to use the existing tb actuators to open/ close all the other itb's at once........?
just thinking
cause i would LOVE to have ITB's, but really dont want the hassel of a standalone
just thinking
cause i would LOVE to have ITB's, but really dont want the hassel of a standalone


