2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

will a 2.0 maf fit in 2.2 and will it work

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 28, 2008 | 10:29 PM
  #1  
john80's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 02-18-07
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
will a 2.0 maf fit in 2.2 and will it work

was wondering because i have a check engine light on saying i am runing rich but i am not.
was wonder if i change maf to 2.0 will it take it away tried to erase rhe code but it comes back.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2008 | 10:49 PM
  #2  
burzumaske20's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-26-08
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: north aurora
if its from the maf sensor you are better off buying a new one that fits directly with the 2.2
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2008 | 10:52 PM
  #3  
El Mariachi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-31-08
Posts: 2,531
Likes: 0
From: Hesperia, California
I had that check light problem, I was really stressing the balt alot one day and was running Cheveron 91 octane, it went away after i eased up on the petal.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2008 | 03:55 AM
  #4  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
i believe the MAF sensor is the same across all models...but it is a physical direct replacement
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2008 | 12:00 PM
  #5  
FacelessKhaos's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-20-07
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: Fayett-Evil NC
Originally Posted by HunterKiller89
i believe the MAF sensor is the same across all models...but it is a physical direct replacement
Nope. The 2.2/2.4 is essentially the same, they read N/A air intake velocity etc. The F/I models (SS/SC & SS/TC) have a different MAF that is calibrated to read the F/I air flow etc.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2008 | 02:38 PM
  #6  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
are you sure? That sounds more like the MAP sensors in our cars. I know the 2.2/2.4 MAO is a 1 bar and the SS is a 2.5bar, but since our MAFs are frequency based and not voltage based, there would be no different calibrations between the sensors.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2008 | 04:05 PM
  #7  
FacelessKhaos's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-20-07
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: Fayett-Evil NC
Originally Posted by HunterKiller89
are you sure? That sounds more like the MAP sensors in our cars. I know the 2.2/2.4 MAO is a 1 bar and the SS is a 2.5bar, but since our MAFs are frequency based and not voltage based, there would be no different calibrations between the sensors.
Think of it like this. Cars require tuning based on MAF readings. So, you take a N/A car and go F/I. You have to tune. Well, taking the theory that the MAF sensor is the same in the F/I car and the N/A car, then why not swap them? I mean in theory you wouldn't have to tune then because the car knows how much air is coming in right? MAP Sensor reads the pressure inside the manifold, the MAP in a F/I Car is going to be higher because of higher manifold pressures as opposed to a N/A car that is taking in about atmospheric pressure (1Bar), so with the SS/SC at about 15PSI that is about 2 Bars of pressure, Atmospheric + Boost.

With that, the MAF Sensor reads higher in the F/I cars than in the N/A cars. I.E. Low to High Freq range in F/I and Low to Med in N/A cars.

So, both the MAP and MAF Sensors are inherently different from each other depending on N/A or F/I Classification. Either way, it will need to be tuned/programmed for.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chefhhr
Complete Cars
7
Oct 26, 2015 10:36 PM
Barkleyj605
2.4L LE5 Performance Tech
4
Oct 24, 2015 12:07 AM
vjoel2011
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
26
Oct 2, 2015 12:11 PM
Cptnslo
Complete Cars
9
Sep 24, 2015 09:32 AM
BettyBlue2.2
2.2L L61 Performance Tech
4
Sep 10, 2015 08:49 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 AM.