2.2 header and lsj header
Sorry, but the information here is incorrect. I know because I have the LSJ header and LSJ DP on my car. The stock 2.2 header is much smaller, and does not allow as much flow. The 2.2 header is longer and the 2.2 DP is shorter. The LSJ header is shorter, but the DP is longer. So, if you want to use LSJ DP or header, you must use both or it will not fit. But trust me when I tell you, the header is certainly smaller on the stock 2.2.
If you are looking for a little more bang for your buck outta that LSJ manifold, have it ported. I can do it, did a bunch of them back in the day, gain a couple hp and still look stock.
Sorry, but the information here is incorrect. I know because I have the LSJ header and LSJ DP on my car. The stock 2.2 header is much smaller, and does not allow as much flow. The 2.2 header is longer and the 2.2 DP is shorter. The LSJ header is shorter, but the DP is longer. So, if you want to use LSJ DP or header, you must use both or it will not fit. But trust me when I tell you, the header is certainly smaller on the stock 2.2.
Sorry, I don't think so. I have a manual and this was the case with my manual vehicle. Header (exhaust manifold) was longer and downpipe was shorter. LSJ exhaust manifold shorter, LSJ DP longer.
I had both of them laid out on my floor and they were certainly different lengths. I'm not by any means an idiot dude. Why do you try to discredit everything I say, for christ sake.
i dont. but i do disagree with you on this. i have both here in my house let me check again. but i remember looking at the downpipe and them being the same. and im pretty sure i have NEVER discredited you on anything before. and never said you were an idiot. the only other thing i have said to you was asking you about how much hp you had and what all you used in your build when you first got it done. anyway back on topic let me check them.
lay one on top of the other. the downpipe very well could be longer. i will stick my foot in my mouth now.
reason it could be longer is the motor sits different in the ss than the ls/lt. my ss/tc downpipe sits about 1/2-3/4 of an inch off my swaybar. (partly due to the way the catback fits in the base model
top of flange to top of flange on each end seems to be almost identical.
reason it could be longer is the motor sits different in the ss than the ls/lt. my ss/tc downpipe sits about 1/2-3/4 of an inch off my swaybar. (partly due to the way the catback fits in the base model
top of flange to top of flange on each end seems to be almost identical.
Last edited by 09blackonblack; May 2, 2010 at 07:11 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
lay one on top of the other. the downpipe very well could be longer. i will stick my foot in my mouth now.
reason it could be longer is the motor sits different in the ss than the ls/lt. my ss/tc downpipe sits about 1/2-3/4 of an inch off my swaybar. (partly due to the way the catback fits in the base model
top of flange to top of flange on each end seems to be almost identical.
reason it could be longer is the motor sits different in the ss than the ls/lt. my ss/tc downpipe sits about 1/2-3/4 of an inch off my swaybar. (partly due to the way the catback fits in the base model
top of flange to top of flange on each end seems to be almost identical.
now line those up in the other order, lsj closer to the cam and the 2.2 farther away from the cam, they are the same length, its like an optical illusion...how much longer do u think the lsj dp is than the 2.2? have you taken a measuring tape to them?



