2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

2.4 is dead.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 09:55 PM
  #51  
Projekt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 24,270
Likes: 1
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
what i ment by lsj having problems is what i have experienced in person

my buddy with a lsj has to get his supercharger replaced because its making a grinding noise

my sisters unmolested stock ss/sc vibrates really bad at idle and randomly shuts off on the highway
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 10:03 PM
  #52  
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-06
Posts: 5,577
Likes: 3
From: Gainesville, FL
Originally Posted by Projekt
what i ment by lsj having problems is what i have experienced in person

my buddy with a lsj has to get his supercharger replaced because its making a grinding noise

my sisters unmolested stock ss/sc vibrates really bad at idle and randomly shuts off on the highway
i agree with you on this, i know a few people that had issues, esp with 2005s.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 10:25 PM
  #53  
balt21's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-19-07
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by riko540
It is a shame although the cobalt is one of the very few cars that offer three different engines. Also the aftermarket industry doesn't really support the 2.4 most of the mods are for the 2.2 or 2.0
as others said 2.2 and 2.4 mods are mostly interchangable. the 2.4 also has HPtuners so they have more potential. many people still dont want to mess with trifecta mail tuning for the 2.2.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 12:21 AM
  #54  
Blue_Balt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-22-07
Posts: 6,179
Likes: 0
From: Howell, NJ
Originally Posted by riko540
I think its 148/155
It's 148 HP@ 5600 and 152 lb-ft @ 4200. It appears that you have the rev the 2.2L LAP a bit more to get both max power and torque.

09 HHR still has the 2.4L engine BTW. It' hasn't been totally killed off just yet.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 12:51 AM
  #55  
REDFOCZ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-22-06
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
I guess my Ion with the 2.4 is rare lol

What ever, it's a nice motor I just hated the fact that it had to run 93 from the factory. I cant complain to much since I would have to run it any ways since Im tuned now
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 02:30 AM
  #56  
tonio5555's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-10-05
Posts: 2,477
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by Acey
I thought it was 148/152 in the L61
Sorry I was comparing to to my 2006 L61, 145hp/155tq.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 09:20 AM
  #57  
brickerenator's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-08-08
Posts: 7,576
Likes: 0
From: Thurmont, MD
I felt the need to repost this


[IMG][/IMG]
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 10:08 AM
  #58  
OrngBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-10-07
Posts: 5,890
Likes: 1
From: West Babylon, NY
why? If you gonna repost that pic.... how bout explanation.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 10:33 AM
  #59  
Dustin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-27-06
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
From: Hatboro, PA
Originally Posted by Badju587
Heh, the 2.2 only gets a 7 tick increase in peak BHP from VVT? Hope the powerband is a bit thicker overall, it'd be a shame to make that engine peaky just to squeak out an extra seven ponies up top.

Not too darn bad of an engine for the car it's in, but I'll take my 2.0 TYVM.
The 2.2's not peaky already? Oh...
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 11:19 AM
  #60  
brickerenator's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-08-08
Posts: 7,576
Likes: 0
From: Thurmont, MD
Originally Posted by OrngBalt
why? If you gonna repost that pic.... how bout explanation.
it seems that everyone is turning into high mpg, low emission freaks
thus the ending of the 2.4
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 12:00 PM
  #61  
IonNinja's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-29-05
Posts: 7,915
Likes: 0
From: AZ
stupid oil issues

all these big muscle cars and 2.4L 4 cylinders are gonna be a thing of the past for a while
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 12:03 PM
  #62  
Jackalope's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 1
From: here
Originally Posted by IonNinja
stupid oil issues

all these big muscle cars and 2.4L 4 cylinders are gonna be a thing of the past for a while
NEVER did I ever think I'd hear 2.4 and muscle car uttered together in the same sentence.

Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 12:21 PM
  #63  
LethalSS's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 05-23-07
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From: not there
I think the 2.4 remains the base engine in the g6 and malibu, they are just slimming down the options in the cobalt line.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 12:35 PM
  #64  
Dunkinuts's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-28-07
Posts: 3,713
Likes: 0
From: Tall Timbers, MD
yeah i can see why they want to remove it but i just think they shouldn't there isn't much need for the weaker motor when people have gotten such good MPG with the 2.4
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 12:40 PM
  #65  
OrngBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-10-07
Posts: 5,890
Likes: 1
From: West Babylon, NY
Originally Posted by Dunkinuts
yeah i can see why they want to remove it but i just think they shouldn't there isn't much need for the weaker motor when people have gotten such good MPG with the 2.4
MPG has nothing to do with it.... The base model cobalts are designed to be econo boxes.

12k, 18k and 23k

If you are targeting the car enthusiast who wants HP and handling you offer the top of the line model.

If you are targeting the people who just want a car to go from point A to point B.... which one are you going to sell more of?

the 2.4 was what, we call, a straddler. It wanted to appeal to both the econo model drivers and a performance drivers, and in the process, appealed to less of each. They made their divide. You want performance or basic transport and the 2.4 does not fit in the business model.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 12:53 PM
  #66  
Blue_Balt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-22-07
Posts: 6,179
Likes: 0
From: Howell, NJ
Originally Posted by LethalSS
I think the 2.4 remains the base engine in the g6 and malibu, they are just slimming down the options in the cobalt line.
x2

The 2.4 ecotec will still be put into cars, just not the Balt.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 12:56 PM
  #67  
WunSick's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-06-07
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Originally Posted by Projekt
the LE5 was the best engine the cobalt line offered untill the LNF

2nd gen engines FTW, ive hardly ever heard of any problems with the LE5 unlike the LSJ which has countless problems.

its a shame its getting discountuned, it was such a great engine.
I agree. No issues at all with my motor, and i beat the **** out of my car. hehe, its going to be sold very soon though.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 01:05 PM
  #68  
nutsandboldts05's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-15-08
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
From: Cuba, New York
In a way you are right Orngbalt, BUT if you phase out the 2.2 the 2.4 then becomes the A to B car and not the middle straddler. I like my 2.4 and I would much rather drive this then a Cruze
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 01:06 PM
  #69  
fballman1987's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-03-06
Posts: 6,793
Likes: 0
From: New Tripoli, Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by Projekt
what i ment by lsj having problems is what i have experienced in person

my buddy with a lsj has to get his supercharger replaced because its making a grinding noise

my sisters unmolested stock ss/sc vibrates really bad at idle and randomly shuts off on the highway
the supercharger has nothing really to do with the motor, its a seperate part.

if it shuts off its probably electrical, so again nothing with the motor.

dont call out a motor and say its the best series of motor, when you cannot back it up. the lsj is a very strong motor, you dont see boosted 2.4's that have over 400whp on stock internals and block do you? all the motors are good for what they need to do, and your opinion was the 2.4 is the best motor, but do research before throwing something under the bus.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #70  
WunSick's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-06-07
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Originally Posted by fballman1987
you dont see boosted 2.4's that have over 400whp on stock internals and block do you?
if i am not mistaken, Hahn has done this. You also need to chill, he states that it was in his experience.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 01:13 PM
  #71  
nutsandboldts05's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-15-08
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
From: Cuba, New York
Originally Posted by fballman1987
the supercharger has nothing really to do with the motor, its a seperate part.

if it shuts off its probably electrical, so again nothing with the motor.

dont call out a motor and say its the best series of motor, when you cannot back it up. the lsj is a very strong motor, you dont see boosted 2.4's that have over 400whp on stock internals and block do you? all the motors are good for what they need to do, and your opinion was the 2.4 is the best motor, but do research before throwing something under the bus.

Actually I'm sure it could handle it for a while, jsut like the LSJ. The clutch would be a problem, but all you need is a amtter of time before either engine gives in and can't handle the power without upgraded internals.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 01:18 PM
  #72  
OrngBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-10-07
Posts: 5,890
Likes: 1
From: West Babylon, NY
Originally Posted by nutsandboldts05
In a way you are right Orngbalt, BUT if you phase out the 2.2 the 2.4 then becomes the A to B car and not the middle straddler. I like my 2.4 and I would much rather drive this then a Cruze
The 2.4 is still a middle straddler in the industry then. Because you would then market it as the econobox but charge too much for it.

It would be even more of a straddler at that point. and you would lose alot of sales because you are no longer competing on that 12k price level that some base models are at.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 01:20 PM
  #73  
berto's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-30-07
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfiled,CA
Originally Posted by SS07
They should have made a turbo 2.4...
LKE WISE
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 01:35 PM
  #74  
OrngBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-10-07
Posts: 5,890
Likes: 1
From: West Babylon, NY
If they madea 2.4 turbo then they would have done so instead of the 2.0 and then they would still be removing a model from the line. Because once again they would have two separate SS's

This will be good for the aftermarket. HP Tuners will have to work harder to crack the new SS and maybe even the base models.

Parts will get very specific and you will see more and more parts for base models because the 2.4 was basically a base model designed for the enthusiast. Now you will have an SS and a base model. So more and more will be made for 2.2's
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 01:35 PM
  #75  
nutsandboldts05's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-15-08
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
From: Cuba, New York
Originally Posted by OrngBalt
The 2.4 is still a middle straddler in the industry then. Because you would then market it as the econobox but charge too much for it.

It would be even more of a straddler at that point. and you would lose alot of sales because you are no longer competing on that 12k price level that some base models are at.
You win
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 AM.