2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

2.4 is dead.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 10:18 AM
  #101  
mike25's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-07-06
Posts: 7,224
Likes: 1
From: west virginia
Originally Posted by OrngBalt
Cams...


Now name something they have for the 2.4 that they dont have for the 2.2
last time i checked they did offer cams for our cars. and hptuners to your question.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 10:21 AM
  #102  
Shibito's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 12,211
Likes: 11
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by OrngBalt
Not to be a dick, but are you assuming that you know more about marketing and sales than the people who make the decision at GM? Do you remember the stat about Cobalt Sales? 98% were 2.2, 1.5 % were 2.4, .5% were 2.0.

The 2.4 was a straddler. You are comparing it to the 2.2 for economy and mileage but the price tag and power put it closer in line with the 2.0. I guarantee most of the people who bought the 2.4 bought it for the leather seats and other ammenities not offered in the 2.2, it did not have alot to do with the power. Yes there will be a small area of people that wanted a lil more power and a good base to build on but not the SS that bought the 2.4, but the majority of it was people wanting a better looking model. I would not be surprised to see an even more upper level 2.2 that will offer leather seats and options for 4 wheels disc.

And the modders that want a power base to build on will find it, either here or elsewhere, and there will be more and more advances to the 2.2 aftermarket and I would not be surprised at all to see HP tuners attacking the 2.2 now because it will now be the base for builds. Not everyone is going to want to buy a 2.0 when they can get a 2.2 for 10k less and then put some power into there.
If the 2.4 is the straddler I fail to see why they sold more then the 2.0 Clearly would have made more sense to turbo the 2.4 and call that the top model and cut the 2.0
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 10:25 AM
  #103  
Blue_Balt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-22-07
Posts: 6,179
Likes: 0
From: Howell, NJ
Originally Posted by ilovecars
wooo 2.2 gets vvt im gonna swap out my head or whatever the **** has the vvt **** in it
I doubt you can do that.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 10:35 AM
  #104  
OrngBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-10-07
Posts: 5,890
Likes: 1
From: West Babylon, NY
Originally Posted by mike25
last time i checked they did offer cams for our cars. and hptuners to your question.
I may be wrong, but last i read there was a dispute about power between the 2.2 and 2.4 becuase while 2.4 had better tuning options, they didnt have cams.

2.2 did not have as good tuning options, but had cams for builds.


and you are getting very specific. You say HP Tuners, but really that is tuning, and the 2.2 does have tuning. Thats like saying RX8's have something the cobalts don't have because they have tein coilovers. We have coilovers... just not the same company.

Originally Posted by Shibito
If the 2.4 is the straddler I fail to see why they sold more then the 2.0 Clearly would have made more sense to turbo the 2.4 and call that the top model and cut the 2.0
They sold more because they made more. and it was targeted has a high end econo box but with a high price tag... thats what made it a straddler. It also has to do with the 2.0 not being available in auto. If it was available in auto, more would have been sold by the people just wanting top end. Not to mention the 2.2 and 2.4 were targeted at a more general population where the 2.0 was targeted very specifically. It doesn't make sense to have two models targeted at the same population where the only difference is 30hp, and the option for leather at 5k more.

And to answer your question about the turbo.... because GM has already had the 2.0 as their 4 cylinder F/I car. They already had the LNF, why go through the R&D to make sure the 2.4 can handle long term F/I when the LNF was already proven

Last edited by OrngBalt; Aug 7, 2008 at 10:40 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 10:40 AM
  #105  
2.4SlowassBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-08-07
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland, Florida
that sucks, say bye bye to any new aftermarket parts.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 10:41 AM
  #106  
REDFOCZ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-22-06
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
What aftermarket. We had like two parts made just for the LE5. Everything else was ripped off the L61
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 10:43 AM
  #107  
OrngBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-10-07
Posts: 5,890
Likes: 1
From: West Babylon, NY
Originally Posted by 2.4SlowassBalt
that sucks, say bye bye to any new aftermarket parts.
Just the opposite, you will see more and more push to get parts for the 2.2, not to say it will get as extensive, but low end civics have OODLES of aftermarket parts. This will begin, and like previously posted, alot of parts are universal for the two models so other than tuning and such, parts should be interchangeable

Originally Posted by REDFOCZ
What aftermarket. We had like two parts made just for the LE5. Everything else was ripped off the L61
QFT... HP Tuners and ????

Last edited by OrngBalt; Aug 7, 2008 at 10:43 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 10:43 AM
  #108  
css9450's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-29-06
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 1
From: Glen Ellyn, Illinois
Originally Posted by OrngBalt
I guarantee most of the people who bought the 2.4 bought it for the leather seats and other ammenities not offered in the 2.2, it did not have alot to do with the power. Yes there will be a small area of people that wanted a lil more power and a good base to build on but not the SS that bought the 2.4, but the majority of it was people wanting a better looking model. I would not be surprised to see an even more upper level 2.2 that will offer leather seats and options for 4 wheels disc.
I bought mine for the 4-wheel disc brakes, the upgraded suspension and more power than the 2.2.... and got it WITHOUT leather. I didn't want leather, and seeing how badly every Cobalt leather seat looks after a year (or even a few months), I know I made the right choice.

Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 10:47 AM
  #109  
Shibito's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 12,211
Likes: 11
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by css9450
I bought mine for the 4-wheel disc brakes, the upgraded suspension and more power than the 2.2.... and got it WITHOUT leather. I didn't want leather, and seeing how badly every Cobalt leather seat looks after a year (or even a few months), I know I made the right choice.

Yea mine's not leather either, I wanted more power at a lower cost then the S/C or T/C. I also don't have a sun roof which made my car quite hard to find... I wasn't going to own a red car either. It came down to me having to fork out the extra cash to get a S/C if I wanted all those options but at the last minuted the dealer got a phone call from a dealership he had talked to before who had just got the car I eventually bought in with a trade somewhere in Indiana.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 10:50 AM
  #110  
SI FTL's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-12-08
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: Rochester NY
Originally Posted by Shibito
Yea mine's not leather either, I wanted more power at a lower cost then the S/C or T/C. I also don't have a sun roof which made my car quite hard to find... I wasn't going to own a red car either. It came down to me having to fork out the extra cash to get a S/C if I wanted all those options but at the last minuted the dealer got a phone call from a dealership he had talked to before who had just got the car I eventually bought in with a trade somewhere in Indiana.


So my car is rare?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 10:51 AM
  #111  
OrngBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-10-07
Posts: 5,890
Likes: 1
From: West Babylon, NY
Originally Posted by css9450
I bought mine for the 4-wheel disc brakes, the upgraded suspension and more power than the 2.2.... and got it WITHOUT leather. I didn't want leather, and seeing how badly every Cobalt leather seat looks after a year (or even a few months), I know I made the right choice.

So the new models in 09 are going to have VVT and will be rated at or about 160hp. that 10hp is not going to be much of a difference. And like I said, I would not be surprised at all to see a 2.2 "Sport" model where they upgrade to 4 wheel discs and maybe even a better suspension set-up. It can be the new top end 2.2, the coupe equivalent to the LTZ.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 11:00 AM
  #112  
Shibito's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 12,211
Likes: 11
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by XtortedCobalt
So my car is rare?
Well the dealer I went through couldn't find ANYTHING that was 2.4L, no sun roof, had premium sound system, had traction control, was an auto, was not red, had the 4 disc brakes, and was a coupe. I actually ALMOST purchased a special edition but that had already sold and was white w/ black stripes.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 11:02 AM
  #113  
Projekt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 24,270
Likes: 1
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Originally Posted by OrngBalt
Not to be a dick, but are you assuming that you know more about marketing and sales than the people who make the decision at GM? Do you remember the stat about Cobalt Sales? 98% were 2.2, 1.5 % were 2.4, .5% were 2.0.

The 2.4 was a straddler. You are comparing it to the 2.2 for economy and mileage but the price tag and power put it closer in line with the 2.0. I guarantee most of the people who bought the 2.4 bought it for the leather seats and other ammenities not offered in the 2.2, it did not have alot to do with the power. Yes there will be a small area of people that wanted a lil more power and a good base to build on but not the SS that bought the 2.4, but the majority of it was people wanting a better looking model. I would not be surprised to see an even more upper level 2.2 that will offer leather seats and options for 4 wheels disc.

And the modders that want a power base to build on will find it, either here or elsewhere, and there will be more and more advances to the 2.2 aftermarket and I would not be surprised at all to see HP tuners attacking the 2.2 now because it will now be the base for builds. Not everyone is going to want to buy a 2.0 when they can get a 2.2 for 10k less and then put some power into there.
ok so let me get this straight, now that the 1.5 % of 2.4 buyers has desolved (lets say 1% go into the 2.2) bringing the 2.2 sales up to 99%, this will make aftermarket companies go ***** deep for modding and tuning solutions? why would they go huge into aftermarket already since clearly the 2.2 out sells EVERY other line of cobalt prior to the 2.4 being taken away?? you know why, the 2.2 is NOT a performance engine, nor is the 2.4, but its still more performance orianted then the 2.2 (considering we have tuning solutions with HPtuners).

not to mention the LE5 is a second gen motor (second gen >first gen for many reasons).

there is only one reason they are discountining this motor, its that the price to manufacture it and place it in the cobalt costs to much per sales. simple as that. you dont need 8 years business to figure that one out.

455rocket did bring up a good point on the topic of compition, almost all other companies offer compition for the 2.4L, by taking it away, chevy buyers will stray towards other comapnies, because God knows i would not downgrade my 2.4L and go buy a 2.2L unless i had no plans to mod it, as i am sure no 2.0L would downgrade to a 2.2 or 2.4 unless it was not intended to be modded.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 11:42 AM
  #114  
OrngBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-10-07
Posts: 5,890
Likes: 1
From: West Babylon, NY
Originally Posted by Projekt
ok so let me get this straight, now that the 1.5 % of 2.4 buyers has desolved (lets say 1% go into the 2.2) bringing the 2.2 sales up to 99%, this will make aftermarket companies go ***** deep for modding and tuning solutions? why would they go huge into aftermarket already since clearly the 2.2 out sells EVERY other line of cobalt prior to the 2.4 being taken away?? you know why, the 2.2 is NOT a performance engine, nor is the 2.4, but its still more performance orianted then the 2.2 (considering we have tuning solutions with HPtuners).

not to mention the LE5 is a second gen motor (second gen >first gen for many reasons).

there is only one reason they are discountining this motor, its that the price to manufacture it and place it in the cobalt costs to much per sales. simple as that. you dont need 8 years business to figure that one out.

455rocket did bring up a good point on the topic of compition, almost all other companies offer compition for the 2.4L, by taking it away, chevy buyers will stray towards other comapnies, because God knows i would not downgrade my 2.4L and go buy a 2.2L unless i had no plans to mod it, as i am sure no 2.0L would downgrade to a 2.2 or 2.4 unless it was not intended to be modded.
Why do low end civics have such a huge aftermarket? because there is demand. We are still a new car, demand will get there. Those 1 liter civic engines are not performance engines but they still have bolt ons out the ass. It has tuning because HP Tuners went for the 2.4 before the 2.2. It obviously makes more sense to go for the SS models before basemodels, but there is no reason to think that they will now snuff the 2.2

I agree with your statement on discontinuing the motor due to price, and thats what put the 2.4 in a bad market position. Power wise it was closer to the 2.2, price wise, it was closer to the 2.0. That is a bad place to be. because you will get people looking for price go for the 2.2, and you will get the people looking for power that will go to the 2.0

Might they lose sales? Yes, significant? no. You are thinking of it as the tuner point of view, people looking into modding and upgrades. the general public does not do that. 95% of cobalts on the road are stock. I would even say that the majority of SS/SC and SS/TC's will stay stock. People aren't looking to do what we do. We are a small small sample of users. And you cannot use OUR way of thinking to justify keeping a model that just simply did not make sense financially. GM is counting on losing some sales due to dropping the 2.4, that is called weeding out customers. They would rather we buy the econo 2.2 or the SS 2.0. You said it yourself, the 2.4 was too expensive for them to maintain, so instead of selling it, you hope customers will upgrade to the 2.0 or settle for a 2.2. If not, well then you lose them and dont have the expense of the 2.4 anymore.

No one is asking you to downgrade, but new consumers will have a new view of things.

2.2's - inexpensive, great gas mileage, lots of different levels to tailor to your liking (more will be offered, this has already started with the LT2 getting 5 spoke wheels in 08), the flexibility of coupe or sedan. The LT's will segregate themselves to the more upper end 2.2's and will likely have options that were only available in SS' (leather, 5 spokes, 4 wheel discs)

and the 2.0 - its sporty, different look, for the enthusiast, trade off low price for power, offered with better suspension.

I am not against the 2.4, I think it was a great car, I wish I had gotten one. But I have been trained to think like upper level management and I guarantee these were the conversations they had.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 12:10 PM
  #115  
mike25's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-07-06
Posts: 7,224
Likes: 1
From: west virginia
Originally Posted by OrngBalt
I may be wrong, but last i read there was a dispute about power between the 2.2 and 2.4 becuase while 2.4 had better tuning options, they didnt have cams.

2.2 did not have as good tuning options, but had cams for builds.


and you are getting very specific. You say HP Tuners, but really that is tuning, and the 2.2 does have tuning. Thats like saying RX8's have something the cobalts don't have because they have tein coilovers. We have coilovers... just not the same company.



They sold more because they made more. and it was targeted has a high end econo box but with a high price tag... thats what made it a straddler. It also has to do with the 2.0 not being available in auto. If it was available in auto, more would have been sold by the people just wanting top end. Not to mention the 2.2 and 2.4 were targeted at a more general population where the 2.0 was targeted very specifically. It doesn't make sense to have two models targeted at the same population where the only difference is 30hp, and the option for leather at 5k more.

And to answer your question about the turbo.... because GM has already had the 2.0 as their 4 cylinder F/I car. They already had the LNF, why go through the R&D to make sure the 2.4 can handle long term F/I when the LNF was already proven
the cams do exist. there are only two methods of tuning for the 2.2. ones is fooling the computer with a piggyback or some other setup. the second, is trifecta, and is for the most part a canned tune. the cams do exist..theyve been around for about a year or two. you just dont hear anything about them. im simply giving you what you asked for. the 2.4 has the ability to use hpt, 2.2's do not. the 2.2 is just a motor designed to pull the load and get from a to b, while never being intended for extreme power. not to say 2.2 havent gone above and beyond.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 12:13 PM
  #116  
WunSick's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-06-07
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Most who didnt want a DD and wanted a cobalt, got the SS/SC, others went with a DD.... the 2.4 is a great motor, but just not pushed enough commercially and not enough demand. They are ending it. Sucks for cobalt lovers (some dont care) but a smart business move. period.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 12:36 PM
  #117  
OrngBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-10-07
Posts: 5,890
Likes: 1
From: West Babylon, NY
Originally Posted by mike25
the cams do exist. there are only two methods of tuning for the 2.2. ones is fooling the computer with a piggyback or some other setup. the second, is trifecta, and is for the most part a canned tune. the cams do exist..theyve been around for about a year or two. you just dont hear anything about them. im simply giving you what you asked for. the 2.4 has the ability to use hpt, 2.2's do not. the 2.2 is just a motor designed to pull the load and get from a to b, while never being intended for extreme power. not to say 2.2 havent gone above and beyond.
clearimage is custom tuning for 2.2's. it is for most of us a canned tune, but for the guys close enough, they got a custom tune.

The 2.4 was the same thing until HP Tuners cracked it. Do you really feel that there will be no push to crack the 2.2's? especially when that is going to be most of the market? Someone is bound to do it.

Originally Posted by WunSick
Most who didnt want a DD and wanted a cobalt, got the SS/SC, others went with a DD.... the 2.4 is a great motor, but just not pushed enough commercially and not enough demand. They are ending it. Sucks for cobalt lovers (some dont care) but a smart business move. period.
QFT, the 2.4 was the middle child. Its only the small group of enthusiasts that will miss it and it is only a big deal because HP Tuners. If HP Tuners hadn't made tuning the for 2.4 there would be no one missing it.

Last edited by OrngBalt; Aug 7, 2008 at 12:36 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 01:08 PM
  #118  
REDFOCZ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-22-06
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Only reason the LE5 has tuning is because it shares the same ECM as the corvette with the E67, all HPT did was support the OS they did not go out of there way to support are cars. Just throwing that out there.

And the newer 2.2's will have tuning since they share their ECM with other cars that HPT is trying to support. I highly doubt that they will get to the E16a any time soon if ever.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 01:13 PM
  #119  
-MD- HHR's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-07-08
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Northeast Ohio, In the Lake
2.4 gone completely from the GM line up?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 01:14 PM
  #120  
455rocket's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-19-06
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
From: Imlay City, Michigan
Originally Posted by -MD- HHR
2.4 gone completely from the GM line up?
No it looks like just the Cobalt and G5
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 01:31 PM
  #121  
Shibito's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 12,211
Likes: 11
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by OrngBalt
clearimage is custom tuning for 2.2's. it is for most of us a canned tune, but for the guys close enough, they got a custom tune.

The 2.4 was the same thing until HP Tuners cracked it. Do you really feel that there will be no push to crack the 2.2's? especially when that is going to be most of the market? Someone is bound to do it.



QFT, the 2.4 was the middle child. Its only the small group of enthusiasts that will miss it and it is only a big deal because HP Tuners. If HP Tuners hadn't made tuning the for 2.4 there would be no one missing it.
I'd still miss it thank you very much...
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 02:10 PM
  #122  
OrngBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-10-07
Posts: 5,890
Likes: 1
From: West Babylon, NY
Originally Posted by Shibito
I'd still miss it thank you very much...
haha
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 05:42 PM
  #123  
riko540's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-08
Posts: 2,860
Likes: 1
From: South Jersey
long story short the sale were not good enough for the ss/na aka sport, end result kill the production of that model to save money. Its a simple business move nothing new.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 05:46 PM
  #124  
OrngBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-10-07
Posts: 5,890
Likes: 1
From: West Babylon, NY
Originally Posted by riko540
long story short the sale were not good enough for the ss/na aka sport, end result kill the production of that model to save money. Its a simple business move nothing new.
There is probably something behind the change from the SS to the Sport. Most people hear SS and think top of the line.

Now its just a Sport... they dont associate the same prestige with it. It may sound stupid, but thats what happenes. Losing the SS name probably impacted sales as well.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 06:48 PM
  #125  
riko540's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-08
Posts: 2,860
Likes: 1
From: South Jersey
ya they dropped an s so its a cobalt s instead of ss
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:12 PM.