2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

Crank pulley diameter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2010, 12:33 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
slowswap's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-25-08
Location: Depew, NY
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crank pulley diameter

Is there a difference in diameters of the crank pullies between LE5/L61 and the LSJ? Just trying to calculate supercharger RPM's if there is a difference in size.
Old 01-16-2010, 12:44 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Maven's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-25-05
Location: Southern New Jersey
Posts: 7,687
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
good question, i honestly dont know, but if there is its not a big difference.
Old 01-16-2010, 12:46 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
slowswap's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-25-08
Location: Depew, NY
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Maven
good question, i honestly dont know, but if there is its not a big difference.
I'm just trying to calculate which supercharger pulley will bring supercharger up to max spike RPM at 7000 on the 2.4. If the difference is negligible, a 2.8 should be a good match up.
Old 01-16-2010, 02:09 PM
  #4  
Member
 
wesg631's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-09-09
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 393
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im thinking they are alil different because on the swap arent you supposed to use a stage 2 belt? which is a bigger belt due to the smaller supercharger pulley on the lsj with the m62 so im guessing that the le5 has a smaller crank pulley than the lsj. This is the way i see it if i am wrong please correct me i don't want to give bad advice
Old 01-16-2010, 02:15 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
slowswap's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-25-08
Location: Depew, NY
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wesg631
im thinking they are alil different because on the swap arent you supposed to use a stage 2 belt? which is a bigger belt due to the smaller supercharger pulley on the lsj with the m62 so im guessing that the le5 has a smaller crank pulley than the lsj. This is the way i see it if i am wrong please correct me i don't want to give bad advice
I was thinking it was smaller because it produces less boost given pulley per pulley, or at least this was my understanding.
Old 01-16-2010, 03:08 PM
  #6  
Member
 
wesg631's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-09-09
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 393
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if it was smaller wouldn't it pull more boost because there would be fewer rotations that's why they make they smaller pullies
Old 01-16-2010, 03:16 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
slowswap's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-25-08
Location: Depew, NY
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smaller on crank = less boost.
Old 01-16-2010, 03:34 PM
  #8  
Member
 
wesg631's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-09-09
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 393
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by slowswap
Smaller on crank = less boost.
that makes sense so my guess of it being smaller is true but how much ?
Old 05-23-2012, 08:38 PM
  #9  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
klotzy_550's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-09
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reason that the LE5 produces less boost and also the same reason that the 2.2 produces less boost is not necessarily due to the crank pulley size, which are almost the same I believe, it is the fact that there is a larger volume that needs to boosted. 2 liters versus 2.2/2.4 liters. Sorry for bumping this thread I just saw it and figured I would throw my .02 in.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jesse
Parts
22
10-20-2015 09:56 PM
SSLOW06
Complete Cars
1
10-01-2015 07:21 PM
Jesse
Stuff
0
10-01-2015 05:47 PM
patooyee
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
0
10-01-2015 01:07 PM
cw383
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
12
09-30-2015 12:41 AM



Quick Reply: Crank pulley diameter



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 AM.