2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

Electric cutout

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 11:14 AM
  #1  
Jaemon52's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-22-07
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Question Electric cutout

Alright, I have very little knowledge of these systems but what is their basic function? Does it eliminate too much back pressure/what are the cons of having one? I have a 2.4 and what could I expect to gain from an electric cutout? I'm really a newb, as I know very little about their exact function, but I like the idea of pushing a button to make the car quiet (can't do a catback because the parents would most definitely notice) haha
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 11:18 AM
  #2  
widowedeight's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-05-07
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
From: pa/jersey
i am just getting in to them too lol basically it just dumps the exhaust right under the car when you open it up and when it is closed the exhaust goes through the whole system........ it will make it so there is like basically no back pressure (i believe) and i saw someone say that the gained 20whp (on a turbo car) when it was open compared to closed...... i am getting one for my ss/tc so i don't have to spend the money on catback



EDIT YOU WILL MORE OR LESS GAIN WHAT YOU WOULD HAVE GOTTEN FROM A DP AND CATBACK WITH JUST THE CUTOUT(attached to a new dp ofc course lol)........ if not a lil more
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 11:20 AM
  #3  
Jaemon52's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-22-07
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Damn though, if I'm not boosted it sounds like an easy way to fry the valves. The le5 likes backpressure too much for a cutout to be healthy. I mean, couldn't you go a cutout right before the muffler for increased bp?
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 11:21 AM
  #4  
JPizzle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-28-06
Posts: 5,790
Likes: 2
From: Tampa, fl
Yes, less backpressure on a turbo car is good... A N/A car, the point for one would be minimal gain of power, but a huge gain in sound. And you can always have it quiet going through the stock catback.

I like the idea of E-Cutouts.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 11:24 AM
  #5  
widowedeight's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-05-07
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
From: pa/jersey
Originally Posted by Jaemon52
Damn though, if I'm not boosted it sounds like an easy way to fry the valves. The le5 likes backpressure too much for a cutout to be healthy. I mean, couldn't you go a cutout right before the muffler for increased bp?
dunno..... and i don't think you would **** anything up with a cutout...... don't quote me on that tho cause i am only just getting in to them but i have seen N/A cars with electric cutouts

Originally Posted by JPizzle
Yes, less backpressure on a turbo car is good... And you can always have it quiet going through the stock catback.

I like the idea of E-Cutouts.
exactly what i am doing..... (attempting to be a sleeper)

Last edited by widowedeight; Feb 19, 2009 at 11:24 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 11:27 AM
  #6  
Jaemon52's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-22-07
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
I guess what I'm going off of is, my buddy's old lt1 trans am. He had longtube headers dumped and he just didn't have enough bp and fried the valves. And that block is much stronger than mine. Perhaps I could go for a quieter catback. The GMPP seems to be quiet, but still have a good strong hone to it.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 01:48 PM
  #7  
WhiteSSBalt's Avatar
Not a Sebring
 
Joined: 02-22-07
Posts: 12,863
Likes: 2
From: Northern VA
These are only beneficial on a boosted car. On an N/A car, such as a 2.4SS, it wouldn't yield good results. If anything, it might actually hurt your performance.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 01:52 PM
  #8  
Firebirdhorn's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-04-07
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
From: KC, MO
Originally Posted by WhiteSSBalt
These are only beneficial on a boosted car. On an N/A car, such as a 2.4SS, it wouldn't yield good results. If anything, it might actually hurt your performance.
truth
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 01:54 PM
  #9  
mkulrey13's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: 08-30-05
Posts: 18,509
Likes: 5
From: New Hampshire
NA car does not need a E-cutout...
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 02:41 PM
  #10  
Jaemon52's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-22-07
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Yeah, I figured such a lack of backpressure would majorly cut torque or damage the engine. I just didn't really know how a cutout worked. Thanks guys, I'll just probably try to get a GMPP catback as soon as I can afford it.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 02:50 PM
  #11  
YelloEye's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 36
From: WA
To my knowledge most of the back pressure in a stock exhaust comes from 1st the header then the DP, I doubt you would actually damage your engine by installing an electronic cutout after the DP.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 03:02 PM
  #12  
WhiteSSBalt's Avatar
Not a Sebring
 
Joined: 02-22-07
Posts: 12,863
Likes: 2
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by YelloEye
To my knowledge most of the back pressure in a stock exhaust comes from 1st the header then the DP, I doubt you would actually damage your engine by installing an electronic cutout after the DP.
You wouldn't "damage" your engine, but it also wouldn't be beneficial in any way either. Just a waste of money really.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #13  
mmcgee123's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-22-08
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
From: troy,michigan
ud get more loss then gain and itd sound like crap sry if u go boost then hell ya itd sound like a damn semi haha
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #14  
Bika's Avatar
Fail Less.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-08-05
Posts: 5,677
Likes: 1
From: Brookfield
you dont have to put the cutout right at the header. I was considering putting one after my high flow cat, maybe even after my resonator. just to bypass the stock muffler which is the main restriction.

through the muffler on the street, dump after cat on race day.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 03:20 PM
  #15  
YelloEye's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 36
From: WA
Originally Posted by WhiteSSBalt
You wouldn't "damage" your engine, but it also wouldn't be beneficial in any way either. Just a waste of money really.
Yeah, I kinda rambled 2 sentences together there. But this basicly sums it up.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 03:34 PM
  #16  
cobaltss86's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-28-08
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 0
From: bedford, tx
what about if you have a supercharger
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 06:27 PM
  #17  
Red07SSNA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-08-06
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 2
From: *
That's right guys, freer exhaust on an N/A car would kill all horsepower and torque...best to put a 1" ID exhaust on it to get INCREASED backpressure and HIGH exhaust flow to increase torque...I figure increased backpressure with a 1" ID exhaust is good for another 35 lbs ft of torque and 60HP!!!!

Please stop the nonsense with the fried valves and backpressure and losing HP with a freer exhaust...EVERY NA car I've run on a track ran faster with an open exhaust compared to a closed exhaust -- EVERY ONE! This car is no different...as long as you leave the cat alone and install the cutout after the cat your ECM will be able to control the fuel ratio. I ask those that keep saying these incorrect things to go to the dragstrip and test it yourself...just unbolt the exhaust at the cat-back connector and try it...the truth may set you free!!!
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 10:31 PM
  #18  
JJAD's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-08-08
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB
so whats the verdict, would the cutout give any gains in anything if it was installed behind the cat and in front of the muffler?
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 11:52 PM
  #19  
Bika's Avatar
Fail Less.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-08-05
Posts: 5,677
Likes: 1
From: Brookfield
same gains as a free flowing catback exhaust system, but louder
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 10:19 AM
  #20  
celicacobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-05
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
why cant the cut out be installed before the cat?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 01:26 PM
  #21  
Bika's Avatar
Fail Less.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-08-05
Posts: 5,677
Likes: 1
From: Brookfield
it can. but unless you are turbo it will just kill your torque and sound like ass.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 11:27 AM
  #22  
celicacobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-05
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
cool, so in other words i could put 1 before the cat.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 12:37 PM
  #23  
Red07SSNA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-08-06
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 2
From: *
Originally Posted by celicacobalt
why cant the cut out be installed before the cat?
Nothing to prevent it -- just hardly any room. Without the cat you'll get a CEL when you run it open -- unless you can tune it out. Won't hurt anything, 'cept your ears
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
Solaris99
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
28
Mar 15, 2017 01:22 PM
ernnyyes
Problems/Service/Maintenance
5
Oct 2, 2015 05:16 PM
09RallyTC
Problems/Service/Maintenance
3
Aug 27, 2015 07:05 PM
Vendian
General Cobalt
3
Feb 2, 2005 04:15 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 AM.