TVS Sport
hard to bounce the rev limiter with an automatic in D.
you really wanna go there? bc we ALL know of a lot of cobalts on here who are retarded. Either its rossshady, one of the 50 cobalts who really thinks they beat 600 cc sportbikes, the guy who thought he beat a gallardo, there was a guy I saw that was posting he said he honestly kept up with a new zr1 in his ss/tc and said they were in the same class of car. How about all the ss/tc guys who think with some bolts on they can go run a 12.10 in the quarter just bc they have the same mods (except they dont have slicks) as CMILLER, so they go running around bragging about having a low 12 second car, when in reality theyve never been to the track or know how to drive. How about that cobalt ss/tc in the war stories thread that "blows" and is "retarded" at driving that everyone is hating on? at least he HAD the ball to race from a dig. How about the other guy in that same thread saying its clearly not a ss/tc (when it in fact is) and calling everyone a douche about it and a fight breaking out. ALL of these are examples of retarded actions. i can go on forever, bc even when I owned my balt i saw this and NEVER made any outrageous claims myself, just sat back and watched. i never said you were retarded. there are many knowledgeable cobalt owners on here, although the quality of the site has gone down in the last 6 to 9 months. And also, i was just kidding, i even said jk in my post. I might be controversial in posting, but its bc im realistic. Coming from one of the quicker cobalts on here when i actually had it (ss/tc's werent even doing full bolts ons yet), i know what the car can and cannot do. when i had my cobalt was my vision of its speed and potential a bit clouded? yeah, it was my car, i was proud of it but i didnt go making these crazy claims over it. i never attacked you personally, it was a joke. you gotta admit there are a decent amount of stupid people on this site. we have all laughed at them or bashed them. so calm down man; i didnt mean any harm.
At the end of the day I really don't care, because like you implied, this forum has devolved to the sad state of affairs which it currently habituates. So though you irked me, and are quite likely a douchebag in your day to day life, at least you aren't retarded. SO I think we're cool, at least I'm not really irritated anymore, so that's good
And this thread is so full of fail that there is no longer a "topic" that we could be "off" from. So at least there is now a little more reading material that will not make anyone dumber for having read it.
So back on topic, any one who owns a dog the size of a football or smaller, has no right to be upset, when said annoying animal is kicked to them through their front window. that is all
Last edited by SS33; May 19, 2010 at 03:24 PM.
if im a douche, then youre a douche. bc im entitled to my opinion, just like you are. sorry i voice it. i havent bad mouthed you at all. you took it to that level. carry on. oh, i have no problems with you btw. 
and btw if you read the entire thing, me and a few other people in the arguement ended up agreeing, hence it fizzled out.

and btw if you read the entire thing, me and a few other people in the arguement ended up agreeing, hence it fizzled out.
if im a douche, then youre a douche. bc im entitled to my opinion, just like you are. sorry i voice it. i havent bad mouthed you at all. you took it to that level. carry on. oh, i have no problems with you btw. 
and btw if you read the entire thing, me and a few other people in the arguement ended up agreeing, hence it fizzled out.

and btw if you read the entire thing, me and a few other people in the arguement ended up agreeing, hence it fizzled out.
And yeah I did read this whole trainwreck of a thread, for some reason.. That's probably why I was so irritated in the first place, lol
btw

.
.
.
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/pictures-videos-64/rossshady120-xtranormal-vid-215569/
it's rendering. Should be good soon.
it's rendering. Should be good soon.
It's all good. We both voiced our opinions, I'll admit my first posted opinion was pretty blunt and probably out of line. SO for that I apologize.
And yeah I did read this whole trainwreck of a thread, for some reason.. That's probably why I was so irritated in the first place, lol
btw

.
.
.

And yeah I did read this whole trainwreck of a thread, for some reason.. That's probably why I was so irritated in the first place, lol
btw

.
.
.

I appreciate the kind words. You would think that Darwin's theory is pretty much absolute, but from time to time, someone slips through the cracks. He is a perfect example.
large scale it is absolute...but you need those genetic variations for it to work. some positive variations, some negative...im sure we all know which side ross falls on




