Lsj + mp90 supercharger
#76
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: 05-31-07
Location: SoCal, Lancaster
Posts: 4,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I sold that header 4-1 shorty i got from you
#78
The one guy doing the header testing put down 311whp with the stock manifold. why dont you try going back to that? but first dyno the same so it doesent skew results of coarse. Im running the stock manifold and the car feels stronger down low and my hpt tells me i lost no flow up top over that 4-1 shorty that has no scavaging effect... just somethin to consider.
I sold that header.
I sold that header.
yeah you told me like 2 weeks after you bought it from me lol
#95
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-03-07
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hmm i would be surprised if you gained a considerable amount of power. lower efficiency, higher parasitic drag, more heat since its still a blower and not a compressor style supercharger aka twinscrew. And in most cases the tvs blowers are more efficient than twinscrews. There are reasons why not much has been done in the past with this blower on these cars. And also why l67 guys are looking into strapping tvs blowers onto their cars and not looking so much into dropping the mp112 instead.
#98
hmm i would be surprised if you gained a considerable amount of power. lower efficiency, higher parasitic drag, more heat since its still a blower and not a compressor style supercharger aka twinscrew. And in most cases the tvs blowers are more efficient than twinscrews. There are reasons why not much has been done in the past with this blower on these cars. And also why l67 guys are looking into strapping tvs blowers onto their cars and not looking so much into dropping the mp112 instead.
doesnt take much more than a m62 to spin
iats are no diff. than my 2.7 m62 setup
it's goin to sit @ 22-23 psi spinning 14k by redline. Havnt even begun to overspin it yet
It spins 100-150cfm more than the m62 overspun thru out the rpm band... dunno what seems bad bout it
Last edited by 100% METH; 11-24-2010 at 02:02 AM.