Drag Racing Kindle Racing and Dalcorp Racing

malibu ss 1/4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2007, 07:59 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-05
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 12,485
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 60 Posts
Originally Posted by RaineMan
Here's some food for thought.

Today's cars are getting heavier b/c they are being made larger and safer. Airbags... re-enforced doors... crumple zones... safety steel... triple laminated glass... etc.

However... noone has stopped to think what happens when two heavier cars hit eachother. The days of the minor "fender bender" are over b/c the cars get so much momentum behind them that they cause major damage even at low speeds. How is this safer?

Two 1500lb cars hitting eachother is gonna do a lot less damage than two 3000lb cars hitting eachother.
But no one is willing to give up on having 1000 pounds of extra crap in thier cars. Everyone wants sound insulation, A/C, upgraded this and that, cars will keep getting more stuff put in them, and will therefore be heavier. The only things out there under 2500lbs are either super-compacts or stripped specialty cars.

Originally Posted by shawn672
My Equinox LS with a custom catback, no rear sear, and CAI....beat a modded 2.4

ran around 14ish i think, cant find the 1/4 slip
so an equinox, with its 185 furious hp, was running 14's with just exhaust and an intake?

BS!!!

Proof or ban

Last edited by ItalianJoe1; 08-28-2007 at 07:59 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 08-28-2007, 08:12 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
avro206's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-17-04
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ItalianJoe1


so an equinox, with its 185 furious hp, was running 14's with just exhaust and an intake?

BS!!!

Proof or ban
yeah I caught that too---my wifes Honda powered 3.5L DOHC Vue is not that fast---and it has 248hp

Last edited by avro206; 08-28-2007 at 08:13 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 08-28-2007, 09:48 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
-Jayson-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-28-06
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by RaineMan
Here's some food for thought.

Today's cars are getting heavier b/c they are being made larger and safer. Airbags... re-enforced doors... crumple zones... safety steel... triple laminated glass... etc.

However... noone has stopped to think what happens when two heavier cars hit eachother. The days of the minor "fender bender" are over b/c the cars get so much momentum behind them that they cause major damage even at low speeds. How is this safer?

Two 1500lb cars hitting eachother is gonna do a lot less damage than two 3000lb cars hitting eachother.

thats not food for thought, cars are not getting heavier. You really think cars that had bodys made entirely of steel and a large displacement V8 was light? Car weight has stayed very similar throughout the years. And even at that, its a Malibu, its supposed to be heavy its a luxurish car.

and when your talking about weight/damage/and safety your all over the place. Its safer today to have two 3,000 lb cars run into eachother as apposed to two 3,000lb cars from say 1960 to run into eachother. I think you fail to understand that the point of todays cars is not to save the car, but save the occupants. Trying to save the car was like mid 1900s thinking.
Old 08-29-2007, 02:22 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Brandon97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-13-04
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shawn672
My Equinox LS with a custom catback, no rear sear, and CAI....beat a modded 2.4

ran around 14ish i think, cant find the 1/4 slip
i'd also like to see proof of this (but suprise you can't find the slip). I had an Equinox when my Cobalt was getting worked on at the dealer and it had no *****.
Old 08-30-2007, 02:40 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
shawn672's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-07-07
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brandon97Z
i'd also like to see proof of this (but suprise you can't find the slip). I had an Equinox when my Cobalt was getting worked on at the dealer and it had no *****.






14.4
Haters, Read and weep...

Mods:
Weight Reduc (Rear seat, mats, spare tire, tools)
Custom CAI
Custom Catback Exhaust with Flowmaster Muffler, larger tubing, and Magnaflow Cat
Ported (barely) and Polished TB
Yokohama All Season Tires, 17" Stock Rims
And Tuned


Here are a few more pics from my myspace:









Every Equinox forum I found, I had the quickest one there, it may be the quickest Equinox yet, who knows.
The Vue sucks *****. Engine is a little bigger but way heavier, plus they put even smaller exhaust tubing, I think they shrunk it about .25" to help control emissions I guess.





Another Pic, the whole ride:








Engine could have held a 75 shot without a problem, would have knocked me into the low 13's but I decided just to trade it in for a Cobalt, lower my payments (both insurance and GMAC) and work on this guy, my 2.2
Planning for 13's with this guy within the next two years. I still don't have 2,000 miles on it.
Old 08-30-2007, 07:34 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
avro206's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-17-04
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No---the Vue is lighter. It's built on the short wheelbase Theta platform. You might know that if you had a better knowledge of these paticular SUVs.

Still don't believe it. Your 3400 would have to have enough mods to make more then the 248hp hp the Vue is making. Thats 63 more hp! I don't see it.

Using logic it makes no sense. I say broken timing lights!
Old 08-30-2007, 05:22 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Brandon97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-13-04
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
stock equinox's run high 16's, so you took off almost 2.5 seconds with I/E/T and some miniscule weight reduction (considering stock they weight 3700lbs) ??? i don't buy it
Old 08-30-2007, 09:44 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
shawn672's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-07-07
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brandon97Z
stock equinox's run high 16's, so you took off almost 2.5 seconds with I/E/T and some miniscule weight reduction (considering stock they weight 3700lbs) ??? i don't buy it
"miniscule"? The rear seat weighs around 300lbs, it had a full size donut with tools. I took out around 500lbs. The reat seat has this whole huge metal sliding seat feature to increase or decrease cargo room, the thing weighed a ton.

It wasnt a practical everyday racer, but it wasn't bad. 210ft/lb's of torque stock made it get up and go. Even broke traction shifting into 2nd.
Old 08-31-2007, 11:58 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Mr_Slobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-20-07
Location: in my car
Posts: 6,709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lmfao
Old 09-01-2007, 04:59 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-05
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 12,485
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 60 Posts
Originally Posted by shawn672
"miniscule"? The rear seat weighs around 300lbs, it had a full size donut with tools. I took out around 500lbs. The reat seat has this whole huge metal sliding seat feature to increase or decrease cargo room, the thing weighed a ton.

It wasnt a practical everyday racer, but it wasn't bad. 210ft/lb's of torque stock made it get up and go. Even broke traction shifting into 2nd.
B.S.

I've driven several stock ones, none were close to being able to chirp tires. No way another 20 hp and taking weight out of the rear let it do that.
Old 09-01-2007, 02:40 PM
  #36  
Member
 
korax123's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-01-05
Location: Arizona City, AZ
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shawn672
"miniscule"? The rear seat weighs around 300lbs, it had a full size donut with tools. I took out around 500lbs. The reat seat has this whole huge metal sliding seat feature to increase or decrease cargo room, the thing weighed a ton.

It wasnt a practical everyday racer, but it wasn't bad. 210ft/lb's of torque stock made it get up and go. Even broke traction shifting into 2nd.
I would like to see that on a scale, spare tire maybe 75lbs, and that seat maybe 100- 150. The way you put it the tire and tools weigh 200 lbs. That some funny stuff there.

Did you have Nitious on it you said something about a 75shot so were you running a 50shot?
Old 09-01-2007, 03:02 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
shawn672's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-07-07
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by korax123
I would like to see that on a scale, spare tire maybe 75lbs, and that seat maybe 100- 150. The way you put it the tire and tools weigh 200 lbs. That some funny stuff there.

Did you have Nitious on it you said something about a 75shot so were you running a 50shot?
Yes...what part of that did you get


edit:
Oops...Forgot to post the Nitrous LOL. I ran a 50 shot in that guy. wow i feel dumb. I guess i didnt make it clear enough at the bottom there. I ran a 50 shot for about a year without a problem, raced about once every 2 weeks for a few passes. No issues, AFR readings were good the whole time, I could have upgraded to 75 but at the time everyone told me to run a 50
Old 09-01-2007, 03:04 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-21-06
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by korax123
I would like to see that on a scale, spare tire maybe 75lbs, and that seat maybe 100- 150. The way you put it the tire and tools weigh 200 lbs. That some funny stuff there.

Did you have Nitious on it you said something about a 75shot so were you running a 50shot?
you have a 75 pound spare tire? damn.
Old 09-01-2007, 04:07 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Brandon97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-13-04
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shawn672
Yes...what part of that did you get


edit:
Oops...Forgot to post the Nitrous LOL. I ran a 50 shot in that guy. wow i feel dumb. I guess i didnt make it clear enough at the bottom there. I ran a 50 shot for about a year without a problem, raced about once every 2 weeks for a few passes. No issues, AFR readings were good the whole time, I could have upgraded to 75 but at the time everyone told me to run a 50
now it makes sense

Originally Posted by shawn672
Mods:
Weight Reduc (Rear seat, mats, spare tire, tools)
Custom CAI
Custom Catback Exhaust with Flowmaster Muffler, larger tubing, and Magnaflow Cat
Ported (barely) and Polished TB
Yokohama All Season Tires, 17" Stock Rims
And Tuned
nope doesn't list n2o
Old 09-01-2007, 05:06 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
shawn672's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-07-07
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brandon97Z
now it makes sense



nope doesn't list n2o
wasnt a donut..was a full tire and rim. i always kept a spare, good thing too because when i traded it in one of the rims was in real bad condition from brake dust corrosion. i bought the rim used with about 10k miles on it but it was in almost perfect condition from a buddy.

i listed the nitrous at the bottom. my bad
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
06lsj_justin
New Members Check In!!
9
09-13-2015 09:53 PM
chevySSfreak88
General Cobalt
32
07-11-2005 12:41 AM
JonyyB
General Cobalt
0
02-12-2005 10:00 PM
JonyyB
General Cobalt
3
08-23-2004 02:36 PM



Quick Reply: malibu ss 1/4?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 AM.