The Results are in!! INTENSE stg3 hit the Track
Originally Posted by Tiny@revitup
Well, like i tried saying before, I was always called a liar till I had some proof, plain and simple, so I never open my mouth until I have video. Period. Just going off my past expiriences.
The only reason I thought it was not legit was because there was a statement made that this was the first time racing a manual and just about every slip was cutting a .1xx light and the quarter mile times were all within about .1xx.
Take that with the fact that there were 2 automatic impala's at the track that day and you get suspicion. The slips were posted, we'll all congratulate Mr. Archer, and I hope that all the customers have the same luck with thier cars.
See you at the track.
The only reason I thought it was not legit was because there was a statement made that this was the first time racing a manual and just about every slip was cutting a .1xx light and the quarter mile times were all within about .1xx.
Take that with the fact that there were 2 automatic impala's at the track that day and you get suspicion. The slips were posted, we'll all congratulate Mr. Archer, and I hope that all the customers have the same luck with thier cars.
See you at the track.
Please say no, besides, his Impala ran high 11's at 113mph with a race weight of 3800lbs. He'd have to have a worse 60' than a 2.1 to run a 13.5.....
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: 12-07-05
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Take that with the fact that there were 2 automatic impala's at the track that day and you get suspicion. The slips were posted, we'll all congratulate Mr. Archer, and I hope that all the customers have the same luck with thier cars.
If you knew there were Impala's there than you obviously knew what i ran
Anyways, yes my old Impala was there with it's new owner, 2.0 - 2.1 60' still went 12.5 12.8 at 111-113 at 3800lbs!
I to hope all our customers have as much fun/luck as we have
Hey tiny, instead of wasting so much time trying to prove Rob wrong, why don't you spend this time doing somthing CONSTRUCTIVE like adding bigger fuel injectors to your stage 1 kit? 
New Member
Joined: 02-03-06
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
Originally Posted by Bad06SS
Lol, owned again.
I don't have spies at all, but I do have a lot of friends...and maybe I should know what you ran that day, but i'm done fighting about this.
Like I said, congrats on your timeslips, and we'll see you on the pavement.
Originally Posted by Tiny@revitup
Wow, tag teamed by fric and frac.
I don't have spies at all, but I do have a lot of friends...and maybe I should know what you ran that day, but i'm done fighting about this.
Like I said, congrats on your timeslips, and we'll see you on the pavement.
I don't have spies at all, but I do have a lot of friends...and maybe I should know what you ran that day, but i'm done fighting about this.
Like I said, congrats on your timeslips, and we'll see you on the pavement.
You stepped over the line when you called him a liar
It's one thing to ask for proof, it's another to call someone a liar. Why don't you guys just call yourselves "accuseitup motorsports"?
Originally Posted by 2s0t0i6
Wow, dude just bequiet! Tiny called him a liar until proof was given. Proof has been provided, argument ended. You and your friends are the only ones keeping it going. Tiny doesn't owe you or anyone an apology. If anything you and everyone but, FAST should apologize to him for running your mouths. He had every right to ask for proof of the (at the time) claimed times.
How many times are you going to say "own3d"? M@d Lam3 l33t Y0!
How many times are you going to say "own3d"? M@d Lam3 l33t Y0!
Who are you?Wow, what language is that? I'll say it as many times as he makes himself look stupid, how's that?
I agree, he had the right to ask for proof, but not to call him a liar. And when did I ask for an apology? Mr. big, bad 2 poster
Go practice your ebonics and eat some wheaties before coming at me and trying to act cool. 
This thread was done and at a rest until you felt like coming in and trying to act like anyone cares about your 2 cents.
Tiny has successfully made revitup motorsports look childish, bottom line. It's a shame this thread had to go to a pi$$ing match, because Rob's times are the best thing that's happend to the cobalt community. Everyone's said their thought's, it's over and done. I say everyone just drop it and let this thread go.
Senior Member
Joined: 04-20-05
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
From: Lockport, NY
Because 13.5's are obtainable as of right now twin charging is not. There's what, maybe 3 twincharged show cars in existance and if there the best thing thats happened to the community they should have posted some decent track times. In my opinion twin charging the cobalt wont be practical for most, ever.. The best thing to happen to my cobalt will be when I sell it..
Senior Member
Joined: 04-20-05
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
From: Lockport, NY
oh and I wasnt part of this argument.....and I know revitup has twin charging plans for the summer... I just enjoy shooting down the hopes of all the twin charging fans.... Pick one and go with it. If it ends up being cost effective than I am wrong and I apologize, I would think that there would have to be more effective/cheaper ways of making power. Pull off the supercharger and go with a turbo if you want that much boost.
Senior Member
Joined: 07-13-05
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
From: WI
Originally Posted by 2s0t0i6
Who said it had anything to do with it? He gave his opinion on the best thing that's happened for the Cobalt, I gave mine. Why the confusion?
I won't say though!
Senior Member
Joined: 07-11-05
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 0
From: Houston
There's a simple quote I'm reminded of when it comes to situations like this:
"When the hammer drops the bull-sh*t stops."
That's why I'll wait for whoever (intense, rev it up, the GM kits, Hahn, etc) to release what they offer and wait for those time slips to come in before I make any decisions.
"When the hammer drops the bull-sh*t stops."
That's why I'll wait for whoever (intense, rev it up, the GM kits, Hahn, etc) to release what they offer and wait for those time slips to come in before I make any decisions.
New Member
Joined: 07-26-05
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Tiny@Revitup, a few pages ago you said "Oh and '2TonFun' Still looks like a cop car. I'm curious as to who u are talking about, because there is a user on srt-4mation with that sn(he happens to live around the block from me).
Senior Member
Joined: 08-19-05
Posts: 3,018
Likes: 0
From: Horseheads, NY
You do realize both kits have ran 13.52 in the quarter right? Difference was in track speed. Fast06ss ran in 28 degree weather iirc and boominit ran in high 50s/low 60s. Huge air density and cooling effect differences. That right there probably makes up for the trap speed difference. They are both the same performance wise in my eyes...just different ways of doing it. And while tiny may have been a little childish in this thread it was fast06ss acting childish in the other thread in 2.0L discussion. Just stop the bickering. The truely fast people/tuners/shops will be seen this year.
Dan
Dan
Senior Member
Joined: 04-07-05
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: Syracuse, NY
Congratulations on your times FAST06SS!
I'm with Tofu, just sitting back and waiting for all the results to come in before I make a decision on which kit to go with. And let's all remember that we are all on the same team regardless of what kit/mods, etc.
I'm with Tofu, just sitting back and waiting for all the results to come in before I make a decision on which kit to go with. And let's all remember that we are all on the same team regardless of what kit/mods, etc.
Originally Posted by 2s0t0i6
What does it matter how many posts I have? You or someone else suggested that Tiny apologize to FAST. Ebonics?? Because I made fun of you saying "owned" like your some CS nerd? And how was the thread done? I responded to your post less then 3 hours after you posted it?? The only reason it went to a "pi$$ing" match was because you and all of the other intense cronies ran your mouths to Tiny, when all he did was ask for proof, which has happened to him on countless occasions. Also once again Tiny called BS and FAST a liar *UNTIL* he had proof, proof is there, bequiet.
I think the twin-charged cobalt is the best thing that's happened to the Cobalt community. 13.5 on DRs(or slicks(which are they?)) with 3000-3100lbs and what 260-270fwhp? Although I offer my congratulations...how is that special?
The only reason it went to a "pi$$ing" match was because you and all of the other intense cronies ran your mouths to Tiny, when all he did was ask for proof, which has happened to him on countless occasions. Also once again Tiny called BS and FAST a liar *UNTIL* he had proof, proof is there, bequiet.I think the twin-charged cobalt is the best thing that's happened to the Cobalt community. 13.5 on DRs(or slicks(which are they?)) with 3000-3100lbs and what 260-270fwhp? Although I offer my congratulations...how is that special?
How is somthing that has no proven track times, no decent dyno #'s (atleast none that i've seen) and most important, NOT SOMTHING THAT ANYONE CAN EASILY INSTALL important?
The reason Rob's times are the best thing to happen because A) it's the fastest SS/SC times to date, B) it was done by a kit that's proven, C) it's a kit that anyone can buy and install themselves. How is the twincharged kit anything special? If I recall, he's even had problems getting it to run right?
Originally Posted by djt81185
You do realize both kits have ran 13.52 in the quarter right? Difference was in track speed. Fast06ss ran in 28 degree weather iirc and boominit ran in high 50s/low 60s. Huge air density and cooling effect differences. That right there probably makes up for the trap speed difference. They are both the same performance wise in my eyes...just different ways of doing it. And while tiny may have been a little childish in this thread it was fast06ss acting childish in the other thread in 2.0L discussion. Just stop the bickering. The truely fast people/tuners/shops will be seen this year.
Dan
Dan
Actually, 13.8X is the fastest time I've seen for the Revitup kit. While traction is the cause for the e.t., your right, it's the trap speed difference that shows Rob is making more power.
Senior Member
Joined: 06-04-05
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
From: LongIsland
Originally Posted by 2s0t0i6
13.5 on DRs(or slicks(which are they?)) with 3000-3100lbs and what 260-270fwhp? Although I offer my congratulations...how is that special?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: 12-07-05
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Guys, let it go!!!!!
Let's move forward and enjoy the up and coming race season!
There will be ALLOT of good things coming from everywhere!
Just be prepared for some hard lessons as well
These cars won't be as easy to go fast as you think
Let's move forward and enjoy the up and coming race season!
There will be ALLOT of good things coming from everywhere!
Just be prepared for some hard lessons as well
These cars won't be as easy to go fast as you think
New Member
Joined: 07-26-05
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
I feel bad for you cobalt guys, it seems the ability to mod this car just isnt there. I keep hearing everyone say "oh give the aftermarket time and they'll come up with something" Honestly, its been a damn long time, the car has to have been out for a year now, and you still basiclly have no go fast parts. Either someone takes some action and starts writing to some major companies or you will be stuck in the mid 13's.
