Drag Racing Kindle Racing and Dalcorp Racing

Smokes Time Slip

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 02:39 PM
  #26  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by SmOKe JeNsOn
well dont know if wind is a factor either but it was blowing 40-50 mph last night. well im still gonna save and get it hp tuned or would a dyno tune be better?
40-50 mph headwind???? yea that will do it!

Originally Posted by SmOKe JeNsOn
well dont know if wind is a factor either but it was blowing 40-50 mph last night. well im still gonna save and get it hp tuned or would a dyno tune be better?
getting "hptuned" and "dyno tune" are not two different kinds. HPtuners is just the program to tune with. you can use it to tune on the dyno or the street

Last edited by hatrickstu; Apr 27, 2008 at 02:39 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 02:55 PM
  #27  
maverick0716's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-09-07
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by hatrickstu
constrcutive criticism isnt going to tell him something is wrong-

here is my cobaltss.net approved comment for those that cant handle the truth-

wow man cool car! you can smoke civics with those times! just keep going and let us know when you paint your headlights!
Okay, I'll post the version of what a immature flamer would do -

Wow man, those times are terrible! Either you can't drive for crap, or your car's crap! I outta Rick Roll yo ass! (poke, lol)


My whole point, if you even care, was to maybe try and figure out possible reasons why his car isn't quite as fast as it should be, whether it's due to altitude, possible driving errors, fuel, etc. Making BS statements just to make the guy feel like crap doesn't do anyone any good.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 03:00 PM
  #28  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
im not going to sugarcoast the fact something is wrong. he did not mention any serious issues in the OP, and mentioned it was cool outside so that leads one to believe something is fucked up. if the truth hurts that bad then you shouldnt be on the internet
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 03:08 PM
  #29  
CobaltSS 16's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 07-01-07
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 29
From: NJ
What was the elevation?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 03:17 PM
  #30  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
i believe he said 3800
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 03:30 PM
  #31  
maverick0716's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-09-07
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: Chilliwack, BC, Canada
3800 is pretty damn high......I bet that would take off about 3-4 mph right there.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 03:36 PM
  #32  
CobaltSS 16's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 07-01-07
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 29
From: NJ
Yea, that elevation is definitely effecting his trap speed.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 03:40 PM
  #33  
SSRedSC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-04-08
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
From: Where you live
Dyno tune would be better unless your plan on doing a bunch of 80+ mph pulls on the street
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 04:20 PM
  #34  
SmOKe JeNsOn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-04-07
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo,TX
looked it up its 3,605 ft and I should have been more specific there is a place that can hp tune it or i can go to the dyno and have them tune it there.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 05:16 PM
  #35  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by SmOKe JeNsOn
looked it up its 3,605 ft and I should have been more specific there is a place that can hp tune it or i can go to the dyno and have them tune it there.
it will depend on what program the shop uses. not all tuning programs can tune for every car
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 05:23 PM
  #36  
SSBalt07's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 02-08-07
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Catonsville MD
Paractice on your launching man.. I ran a 14.2 @101.58mph with 2.20 60ft with only Catback an airbox mod. need to get them 60ft'rs down
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 11:30 AM
  #37  
SmOKe JeNsOn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-04-07
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo,TX
Originally Posted by SSBalt07
Paractice on your launching man.. I ran a 14.2 @101.58mph with 2.20 60ft with only Catback an airbox mod. need to get them 60ft'rs down
well yea ur at 479 ft pretty damn close to sea level.

also I talked to the guy in the GN on my other forums his tranny was acting up and was shifting outta 2nd late here was his mods

Hooker exhaust with cutout (cutout did nearly nothing for the car, but did raise my mph by about 1-1.5 on the top end)
Cold air intake
mabye a slight cam
Tune by George at Boost Performance
235/60R15 BFG drag radials that are about 5 years old sittin out back.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 11:59 AM
  #38  
light'bolt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-23-06
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
From: Texas boy stuck in an Iowa Cornfield
Originally Posted by SmOKe JeNsOn
well 1st time at track it was very very very fun. I got to run a total of 10 times in 2 hrs. Heres my best time on street tires All i gotta say is time for some more mods. Wheel hop sucked bad on a couple of runs. I did beat an 87 grand national tho.

reaction--- .5029
60 ft---2.2842
330 ft----6.3171
ET@594ft---8.9161
1/8 ET----9.5062
1/8 MPH----76.25
1/4 ET----14.5921
1/4 MPH----97.40
Heres my best time from Earlville IA on Sunday. 1058 alt. 40 degrees, not quite 50mph winds just breezy 5-10 mph

rt.............095
60'...........2.316
330..........6.342
1/8...........9.399
MPH..........80.75
1000.........11.993
1/4...........14.144
MPH..........106.83

you were faster till the 1/8 mark then ......................
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 12:23 PM
  #39  
pjk91's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-07-05
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 0
From: San Pedro/PV
Mine

2.33 60ft
330' 6.229
1/8 9.394
mph 78.33
1000 12.084

14.4 @ 98mph

His

reaction--- .5029
60 ft---2.2842
330 ft----6.3171
ET@594ft---8.9161
1/8 ET----9.5062
1/8 MPH----76.25
1/4 ET----14.5921
1/4 MPH----97.40

Very strange numbers man. I'm running a 3.34" tho, and I'm a 2.4 ( i was fairly rich the whole run, you may be running rich)
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 12:55 PM
  #40  
stangthang's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 07-29-07
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
I thought your times looked ok...but what do I know...I have never been to a track either.... I would probably run 1/4 15's or something with stock 06 SS/SC. I say congrats on your times and on posting them here.... I want to go this summer but will probably be laughed at.... Oh well.... Hope your car is running OK and it was just a combination of altitude/first time/ head winds....
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 01:03 PM
  #41  
06BrandonSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-24-07
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
From: Griffith, Indiana
Your times are excellent for a first time at the track. I ran almost the same as you when I took my first runs down the track 14.44@101 was my best out of five and my clutch started slipping after that run. Keep it up, keeping the tires hooked up is tough but times will get better with practice.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zharrington_2010LNF
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
21
Feb 8, 2016 01:43 PM
biniecki
Problems/Service/Maintenance
8
Oct 25, 2015 02:23 PM
Jesse
Parts
15
Oct 13, 2015 09:32 PM
Iceberg
New Members Check In!!
8
Sep 29, 2015 12:33 PM
Iceberg
Drivetrain
1
Sep 28, 2015 01:31 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:30 PM.