2.4L Confirmation
2.4L Confirmation
Hello All,
One of our dealers in Canada has asked us whether or not our 2.2L Turbo kit will work on the cars with the 2.4L engine? He says the cylinder head is the same but he's unsure about the ECU. Anyone know if the 2.2L & 2.4L engines use the same ECU?
Dave
One of our dealers in Canada has asked us whether or not our 2.2L Turbo kit will work on the cars with the 2.4L engine? He says the cylinder head is the same but he's unsure about the ECU. Anyone know if the 2.2L & 2.4L engines use the same ECU?
Dave
no they dont Hp tuners has broke into the 2.4 and the 2.0 but the 2.2 has a different ECU. So you could make the turbo for the 2.4 and be able to tune it with out piggybacks
Yes for purchase.
The problem with 2.4 boost tuning is the fact that the variable cam control is not yet accessible with the current version. HPT just stated it will be within the next two releases. Secondly, cam control and map fueling is currently calculated using a one bar map. If you had a way to plot and log a 5 dimensional VE table, you still couldn't change one without changing the other.
Best bet imo is to run either a piggyback to fool the stock ECM into seeing only one bar max and using the MAF to control fueling (limp mode possiblity tho) or, replacing the stock one bar with two bar, recalibrating it in HPT while staying with a one bar table and hope when the table goes out of range it just uses the last known good value and relies on the MAF, kinda what LSJs do after 210kpa, or using stock tune, run some sort of map clamp or a missing link type of device and again hope to not set a p0068 limp mode.
The problem with 2.4 boost tuning is the fact that the variable cam control is not yet accessible with the current version. HPT just stated it will be within the next two releases. Secondly, cam control and map fueling is currently calculated using a one bar map. If you had a way to plot and log a 5 dimensional VE table, you still couldn't change one without changing the other.
Best bet imo is to run either a piggyback to fool the stock ECM into seeing only one bar max and using the MAF to control fueling (limp mode possiblity tho) or, replacing the stock one bar with two bar, recalibrating it in HPT while staying with a one bar table and hope when the table goes out of range it just uses the last known good value and relies on the MAF, kinda what LSJs do after 210kpa, or using stock tune, run some sort of map clamp or a missing link type of device and again hope to not set a p0068 limp mode.
Yes for purchase.
The problem with 2.4 boost tuning is the fact that the variable cam control is not yet accessible with the current version. HPT just stated it will be within the next two releases. Secondly, cam control and map fueling is currently calculated using a one bar map. If you had a way to plot and log a 5 dimensional VE table, you still couldn't change one without changing the other.
Best bet imo is to run either a piggyback to fool the stock ECM into seeing only one bar max and using the MAF to control fueling (limp mode possiblity tho) or, replacing the stock one bar with two bar, recalibrating it in HPT while staying with a one bar table and hope when the table goes out of range it just uses the last known good value and relies on the MAF, kinda what LSJs do after 210kpa, or using stock tune, run some sort of map clamp or a missing link type of device and again hope to not set a p0068 limp mode.
The problem with 2.4 boost tuning is the fact that the variable cam control is not yet accessible with the current version. HPT just stated it will be within the next two releases. Secondly, cam control and map fueling is currently calculated using a one bar map. If you had a way to plot and log a 5 dimensional VE table, you still couldn't change one without changing the other.
Best bet imo is to run either a piggyback to fool the stock ECM into seeing only one bar max and using the MAF to control fueling (limp mode possiblity tho) or, replacing the stock one bar with two bar, recalibrating it in HPT while staying with a one bar table and hope when the table goes out of range it just uses the last known good value and relies on the MAF, kinda what LSJs do after 210kpa, or using stock tune, run some sort of map clamp or a missing link type of device and again hope to not set a p0068 limp mode.
ECM's in these cars suck
just make a 2.4 kit that you can buy without tuning or have hp tuners avaliable with the kit for an additional charge with a pretune. also check the difference between automatic and 5 speed as i think more autos will buy turbo kits from what ive seen so far me being one of them. the engines are suppossedly mounted in slightly different locations from auto-5 speed. same goes for the 2.2
as far as i know, the heads of the two are in no way similar.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



