Forced Induction Turbos/Superchargers

Rear mounted turbo 2.2 ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 09:58 AM
  #1  
no_mo_tires's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: 07-14-08
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: ft. lauderdale
Rear mounted turbo 2.2 ?

I was wondering if anyone has heard anything about anyone doing the rear mounted turbo thing to a cobalt? I have seen it on vettes and stuff , any opinions?> anyone know if this is even possible on our cars? I had just recently (15 min ago) started pondering the idea and wanted to know what you guys thought ... all the tuning and stuff I got covered since I work at a dealership and know at least 3 people here who can help me tune. I was told by a co-worker that there are kits for this type of application but I couldnt find one speciificly for our car........sorry If I sound like a newb to FI. its because I AM!!!!

Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 10:00 AM
  #2  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
there's no need for a remote mounted turbo because you can fit one in the engine bay. the remote mounted turbos are usually for cars that don't have the space to put them near the engine.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 10:12 AM
  #3  
Tazmanian_Dvl's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 3,654
Likes: 0
From: Butler, PA
There are cooling advantages to having a rear mounted turbo however...
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 10:28 AM
  #4  
no_mo_tires's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: 07-14-08
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: ft. lauderdale
[QUOTE=D4u2s0t;2855400]there's no need for a remote mounted turbo because you can fit one in the engine bay. the remote mounted turbos are usually for cars that don't have the space to put them near the engine.[/QUOTE

not really...... theres about x1000000 advantages to having it mounted in the back , heat/lag for one. plus the sound is much better than any performance exhaust...... someone give me real feedback please lol.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 10:29 AM
  #5  
Jn2's Avatar
Jn2
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-04-07
Posts: 7,791
Likes: 3
From: Texas
there is already a thread on it, search STS ull see another 2.2 was in the works, i think hes down right now though, his thread is pretty beefy
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 10:30 AM
  #6  
umrdyldo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-06-06
Posts: 11,663
Likes: 65
From: MO
It has been done on a 2.2 and is a worthwhile cause.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 10:35 AM
  #7  
no_mo_tires's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: 07-14-08
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: ft. lauderdale
thanks guys and d4u2sot didnt mean to sound like a jerk , I re-read my post and was like , damn that kinda came off caddy.... didnt mean to sound like that , you are one of my favorite/most knowledgable people on here however I do disagree with what you said.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 12:31 PM
  #8  
MapOfTaziFoSho's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-11-08
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
From: The Mogadishu of the Midwest
Remote mounting on a 4 cylinder seems completely worthless for a great many reasons. I would list them, but I'm lazy.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 12:53 PM
  #9  
Tazmanian_Dvl's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 3,654
Likes: 0
From: Butler, PA
I can think of two advantages right off the top of my head.

1. Cooler engine compartment temps since the turbo is mounted in the rear
2. Cooler IAT's since the air has the length of the car to cool down after passing through the turbo
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 05:10 PM
  #10  
crakums's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-04-08
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: hendersonville tn
wouldnt there be a big percent of boost lost if it has to travel all the wal up the car from the rear?
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 09:26 PM
  #11  
-Jayson-'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-28-06
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Remote mount turbos work really well on 4 cylinders. I know someone who had one on his 2.2 Ecotec Cavy, made 262WHP with like 10-12 PSI. With a normal power curve. Remote mounts dont work the best when trying to make big numbers, but for a daily driver with some kick, they work perfectly.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 09:30 PM
  #12  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by no_mo_tires
not really...... theres about x1000000 advantages to having it mounted in the back , heat/lag for one. plus the sound is much better than any performance exhaust...... someone give me real feedback please lol.
By the time the exhaust reaches the turbo it will have lost much of its energy. You are increasing lag by putting it back there.

If you want it for the sound, go for it.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 09:30 PM
  #13  
copson20's Avatar
Premium Member
 
Joined: 10-27-07
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MO
Here is the link to the 2.2 Cobalt Rear Mounted Turbo

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/show...+mounted+turbo
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 09:32 PM
  #14  
Perfect.disguise's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-20-08
Posts: 6,780
Likes: 0
From: .
More weight, more charge pipes for boost leaks, little more lag unless you use a puny T25 or something. I was looking into the idea when I had my 01 GT because it was a lot easier than putting on manifolds on the 4.6 but end the end it wasn't really worth being cheap about it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
bigdeertz
Parts
47
Nov 17, 2016 09:41 AM
Tupp
Suspension
5
Sep 30, 2015 08:18 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
Sep 27, 2015 08:53 PM
GBRunner24
Featured Car Showcase
3
Sep 26, 2015 06:44 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:07 PM.