Fuel Economy - Hypermiling Dedicated to discussions on fuel economy improvements and related modifications.

Should I be putting in regular of 91?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 11:57 PM
  #1  
buckethead's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Surrey B.C.
Should I be putting in regular of 91?

I know it been asked before but
So Ive had my car for almost 3 weeks now and the dealer told me that putting in regular would be fine but I got my owners manual today and it said I should be putting in 91 is whatever is closest to it.

MY question is what octane should I be putting in my car? as of right now im getting 500km per tank that is a mix of city and highway driving.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 12:02 AM
  #2  
Spectral's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-30-06
Posts: 11,850
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way, Washington
you have a 2.4 you should be fine with regular. as long as its not **** gas.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 12:06 AM
  #3  
buckethead's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Surrey B.C.
I normally put chevron gas or petro Canada gas in the car.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 12:06 AM
  #4  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
"Premium recommended but not required"

It has been proven on this forum that you'll actually get better mileage and performance with premium gas, and that it's better for your engine, but at the end of the day the bold text is what's in your owner's manual, so do with it what you will.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 12:08 AM
  #5  
MachiBLue's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-20-05
Posts: 3,402
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
you can run regular, but performance may suffer. I'm not too familiar with the specifics, but your car will adjust to the lower grade, hence lowering performance.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 12:09 AM
  #6  
chris88z24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 14,142
Likes: 71
From: NY
Just put 91 in.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 12:11 AM
  #7  
kreid144's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 09-16-08
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: north new jersey
performance does suffer with regular go for the premium gas better performance and mileage trust me i got the same car 07 SS Sedan

the 2.4 will run on anything i once had to run mine on 87 octane just be aware and listen to your engine for knocks if it knock put the highest octane you can find in immediately

2.4 has VVT (Variable Valve Timing)
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 12:14 AM
  #8  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Proof:

Cobalt 2.4: 173 hp with premium gas
Upcoming G6 coupe, same 2.4: 164 hp with regular gas

Differing tunes as well. But again, at the end of the day, GM wouldn't say "NOT REQUIRED" if regular gas did any actual harm to the engine. Just put 91 in though... only costs a few cents more.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 12:17 AM
  #9  
buckethead's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Surrey B.C.
damn and I just filled my tank.....................look like im going to go do some driving tomorrow and the fill it up with premium.

thanks for the info.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 12:44 AM
  #10  
zay52790's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-01-07
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
91 at least, hell i run 93 in mine, your car wont perform nearly as well and will probably knock with lower octane gas
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 12:46 AM
  #11  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Originally Posted by zay52790
91 at least, hell i run 93 in mine, your car wont perform nearly as well and will probably knock with lower octane gas
You have a notably modded SC. 87 isn't as bad for the 2.4.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 02:17 PM
  #12  
_UnLiMiTeD_'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-15-08
Posts: 4,339
Likes: 0
From: Maple Ridge, B.C Canada
i had 87 in my 2.4 but it ran smoother and performed better with premium. I always put premium in it, gets better gas mileage and is overal, better for the motor
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 02:39 PM
  #13  
black-balt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-10-08
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland, Fl.
Yeah Chevy told me that higher than base Octane isn't the best choice for my 2.2, but the cav 2.2 I had ran fine with mid grade...never got premium, cuz I heard it would mess up the motor.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 06:03 PM
  #14  
domin8_gt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-10-06
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Originally Posted by zay52790
91 at least, hell i run 93 in mine, your car wont perform nearly as well and will probably knock with lower octane gas
Altitude plays a factor whether you have 93 or 91 octane. I'm at 4500' and I don't have 93 octane as an option anywhere.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 09:12 PM
  #15  
kreid144's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 09-16-08
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: north new jersey
Originally Posted by black-balt
Yeah Chevy told me that higher than base Octane isn't the best choice for my 2.2, but the cav 2.2 I had ran fine with mid grade...never got premium, cuz I heard it would mess up the motor.
yea the 2.2 was designed for base octane ..... the 2.4 that has vvt will run on any but at 87 it runs rough and the power is turned down but with 93 it runs smooth with all the power

the 2.0 sc or tc i think the manual says 93 recommended but not required but i think their have been people on here that have had problems from running anything less than 91
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 09:16 PM
  #16  
ericgt79's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 6,094
Likes: 0
From: Killeen,TX
i run 93 now but i have ran 87 before and its a noticable difference in performance...to me anyway.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 09:27 PM
  #17  
NS06G5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-06-07
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
From: Nova Scotia
now that's its' gotten cold, my idle is all screwed up(2.2). I've run gas line antifreeze to clean up any water in the lines, but still rough idle. I've been running 87 all along, I think next time I'll try 93 and see what happens.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
06MetallicBalt
Mid East
10
Jul 20, 2025 08:47 PM
Supercharged06SS
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
21
Dec 11, 2022 04:47 PM
Sl0wbaltSS
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
18
Nov 21, 2018 11:11 PM
Jesse
Stuff
0
Oct 1, 2015 05:47 PM
Tupp
Suspension
5
Sep 30, 2015 08:18 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:09 AM.