Fuel Economy - Hypermiling Dedicated to discussions on fuel economy improvements and related modifications.

Should I be putting in regular of 91?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-2008, 11:57 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
buckethead's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-23-08
Location: Surrey B.C.
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Should I be putting in regular of 91?

I know it been asked before but
So Ive had my car for almost 3 weeks now and the dealer told me that putting in regular would be fine but I got my owners manual today and it said I should be putting in 91 is whatever is closest to it.

MY question is what octane should I be putting in my car? as of right now im getting 500km per tank that is a mix of city and highway driving.
Old 11-19-2008, 12:02 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Spectral's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-30-06
Location: Federal Way, Washington
Posts: 11,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you have a 2.4 you should be fine with regular. as long as its not **** gas.
Old 11-19-2008, 12:06 AM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
buckethead's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-23-08
Location: Surrey B.C.
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I normally put chevron gas or petro Canada gas in the car.
Old 11-19-2008, 12:06 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Acey's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-02-07
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 8,977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Premium recommended but not required"

It has been proven on this forum that you'll actually get better mileage and performance with premium gas, and that it's better for your engine, but at the end of the day the bold text is what's in your owner's manual, so do with it what you will.
Old 11-19-2008, 12:08 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
MachiBLue's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-20-05
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you can run regular, but performance may suffer. I'm not too familiar with the specifics, but your car will adjust to the lower grade, hence lowering performance.
Old 11-19-2008, 12:09 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
chris88z24's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-03-07
Location: NY
Posts: 14,148
Likes: 0
Received 71 Likes on 55 Posts
Just put 91 in.
Old 11-19-2008, 12:11 AM
  #7  
Member
 
kreid144's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-08
Location: north new jersey
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
performance does suffer with regular go for the premium gas better performance and mileage trust me i got the same car 07 SS Sedan

the 2.4 will run on anything i once had to run mine on 87 octane just be aware and listen to your engine for knocks if it knock put the highest octane you can find in immediately

2.4 has VVT (Variable Valve Timing)
Old 11-19-2008, 12:14 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Acey's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-02-07
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 8,977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Proof:

Cobalt 2.4: 173 hp with premium gas
Upcoming G6 coupe, same 2.4: 164 hp with regular gas

Differing tunes as well. But again, at the end of the day, GM wouldn't say "NOT REQUIRED" if regular gas did any actual harm to the engine. Just put 91 in though... only costs a few cents more.
Old 11-19-2008, 12:17 AM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
 
buckethead's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-23-08
Location: Surrey B.C.
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
damn and I just filled my tank.....................look like im going to go do some driving tomorrow and the fill it up with premium.

thanks for the info.
Old 11-19-2008, 12:44 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
zay52790's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-01-07
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
91 at least, hell i run 93 in mine, your car wont perform nearly as well and will probably knock with lower octane gas
Old 11-19-2008, 12:46 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Acey's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-02-07
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 8,977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zay52790
91 at least, hell i run 93 in mine, your car wont perform nearly as well and will probably knock with lower octane gas
You have a notably modded SC. 87 isn't as bad for the 2.4.
Old 11-20-2008, 02:17 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
_UnLiMiTeD_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-15-08
Location: Maple Ridge, B.C Canada
Posts: 4,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i had 87 in my 2.4 but it ran smoother and performed better with premium. I always put premium in it, gets better gas mileage and is overal, better for the motor
Old 11-20-2008, 02:39 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
black-balt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-08
Location: Lakeland, Fl.
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah Chevy told me that higher than base Octane isn't the best choice for my 2.2, but the cav 2.2 I had ran fine with mid grade...never got premium, cuz I heard it would mess up the motor.
Old 11-20-2008, 06:03 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
domin8_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-10-06
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zay52790
91 at least, hell i run 93 in mine, your car wont perform nearly as well and will probably knock with lower octane gas
Altitude plays a factor whether you have 93 or 91 octane. I'm at 4500' and I don't have 93 octane as an option anywhere.
Old 11-23-2008, 09:12 PM
  #15  
Member
 
kreid144's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-08
Location: north new jersey
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by black-balt
Yeah Chevy told me that higher than base Octane isn't the best choice for my 2.2, but the cav 2.2 I had ran fine with mid grade...never got premium, cuz I heard it would mess up the motor.
yea the 2.2 was designed for base octane ..... the 2.4 that has vvt will run on any but at 87 it runs rough and the power is turned down but with 93 it runs smooth with all the power

the 2.0 sc or tc i think the manual says 93 recommended but not required but i think their have been people on here that have had problems from running anything less than 91
Old 11-23-2008, 09:16 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
ericgt79's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-23-08
Location: Killeen,TX
Posts: 6,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i run 93 now but i have ran 87 before and its a noticable difference in performance...to me anyway.
Old 11-23-2008, 09:27 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
NS06G5's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-06-07
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
now that's its' gotten cold, my idle is all screwed up(2.2). I've run gas line antifreeze to clean up any water in the lines, but still rough idle. I've been running 87 all along, I think next time I'll try 93 and see what happens.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Supercharged06SS
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
21
12-11-2022 04:47 PM
06MetallicBalt
Mid East
9
08-17-2021 03:40 PM
Sl0wbaltSS
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
18
11-21-2018 11:11 PM
Jesse
Stuff
0
10-01-2015 05:47 PM
Tupp
Suspension
5
09-30-2015 08:18 PM



Quick Reply: Should I be putting in regular of 91?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:13 AM.