NewB
It's funny, I have ported 243's and a TQV3 cam as well. If I add 15% to my numbers (supposed difference from mustang dyno to dynojet) I get about 464whp, too! lol
is your car a auto, or 6 speed. uncles is a 6 speed, suposlly its a big difference.. His Camaro with the SAME motor, and stall put out 420, then he wrecked it, and bought a c5 with a bad motor, put that motor in, ( same exact motor, nothing different, except the headers,and axleback ) and he put down 464, on a mustang dyno.
is your car a auto, or 6 speed. uncles is a 6 speed, suposlly its a big difference.. His Camaro with the SAME motor, and stall put out 420, then he wrecked it, and bought a c5 with a bad motor, put that motor in, ( same exact motor, nothing different, except the headers,and axleback ) and he put down 464, on a mustang dyno.
Mine is a 6spd as well.. The reason his numbers were higher in the vette is the fact that there is no driveshaft to eat up power, the trans is directly connected to the rear. Mine made 402 on a mustang dyno through 3.91 gears which are known to lower numbers a bit from the stock 3.46's. 
I love them!
Here is a video of me launching with them on slicks: (I did a baby burnout on purpose to spin first and not break axle stubs)
5500 RPM dump!
http://www..youtube.com/watch?v=0x_CBVSZTTA
I made 7 passes and broke a stub on the 8th after saying F it and doing a John Force burnout! haha
Here is a video of me launching with them on slicks: (I did a baby burnout on purpose to spin first and not break axle stubs)
5500 RPM dump!
http://www..youtube.com/watch?v=0x_CBVSZTTA
I made 7 passes and broke a stub on the 8th after saying F it and doing a John Force burnout! haha
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



