Essentials for 2.2L + N20?
Essentials for 2.2L + N20?
Hello everyone, im new and this is my 1st post (Applauds)
Ive been reading around the forum and if what i have learned is correct then i will need to do the following to use n20 on my G5:
1. Get a n20 kit (duh....im going zex wet)
2. 2 step colder spark plugs
3. 91+ fuel
And thats about it right? Just wondering where i can get 2 step colder spark plugs and what do they do that reg spark plugs do not?
And is it absoutely necesarry to use 91+ fuel?
Thanks everyone!
Ive been reading around the forum and if what i have learned is correct then i will need to do the following to use n20 on my G5:
1. Get a n20 kit (duh....im going zex wet)
2. 2 step colder spark plugs
3. 91+ fuel
And thats about it right? Just wondering where i can get 2 step colder spark plugs and what do they do that reg spark plugs do not?
And is it absoutely necesarry to use 91+ fuel?
Thanks everyone!
Lots are suggesting getting one of the 2.4 intake manifolds from CED. the manifold on a 2.2 is a two piece glued together to make one. the 2.4 is a single solid molded piece. should be able to take more of a beating and will also open up your airway as well.
non modded 2.2 talked about a loss in torque because they were leaning out, but with N2O you should be fine
non modded 2.2 talked about a loss in torque because they were leaning out, but with N2O you should be fine
Lots are suggesting getting one of the 2.4 intake manifolds from CED. the manifold on a 2.2 is a two piece glued together to make one. the 2.4 is a single solid molded piece. should be able to take more of a beating and will also open up your airway as well.
non modded 2.2 talked about a loss in torque because they were leaning out, but with N2O you should be fine
non modded 2.2 talked about a loss in torque because they were leaning out, but with N2O you should be fine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYf5OIQG8XA
Last edited by OrngBalt; Aug 24, 2007 at 04:23 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
So what if I did, CAI and Intake Manifold only. Will that let me run a 50-75 shot? without any exhaust mods.
I see N2O as more suited to my needs, I rarely need real power, only when I'm at the track. Turbo is a good idea but too expensive, gives you power (and potential problems) all of the time, whereas N2O is more on demand, only when you need it. Not to mention it's about $700 for the wet kit vs ~$3500+ for the Hahn Turbo kit lol
ive talked about that with a few people. I think the N2O is less risky, especially when done right. because you are only putting extra stress on the engine at certain times, not during the everyday drive.
as for what else you would need... honestly... i dont know. but treat your engine like a lung. you are letting it breathe in real deep with the intake and manifold but stifling it with the exhaust. if you upgraded the exhaust manifold, down pipe, and added a cat back then you would really let your car breathe more freely. just don't go too big on the pipes 2.5, maybe 2.75... any bigger and you will actually lose performance.
as for what else you would need... honestly... i dont know. but treat your engine like a lung. you are letting it breathe in real deep with the intake and manifold but stifling it with the exhaust. if you upgraded the exhaust manifold, down pipe, and added a cat back then you would really let your car breathe more freely. just don't go too big on the pipes 2.5, maybe 2.75... any bigger and you will actually lose performance.
ive talked about that with a few people. I think the N2O is less risky, especially when done right. because you are only putting extra stress on the engine at certain times, not during the everyday drive.
as for what else you would need... honestly... i dont know. but treat your engine like a lung. you are letting it breathe in real deep with the intake and manifold but stifling it with the exhaust. if you upgraded the exhaust manifold, down pipe, and added a cat back then you would really let your car breathe more freely. just don't go too big on the pipes 2.5, maybe 2.75... any bigger and you will actually lose performance.
as for what else you would need... honestly... i dont know. but treat your engine like a lung. you are letting it breathe in real deep with the intake and manifold but stifling it with the exhaust. if you upgraded the exhaust manifold, down pipe, and added a cat back then you would really let your car breathe more freely. just don't go too big on the pipes 2.5, maybe 2.75... any bigger and you will actually lose performance.
My largest issue, money. I'm tryin to add as much power as cheap as possible lol, sounds bad i kno. I'm wondering if I can do CAI, intake manifold, then N2O...and then later on full exhaust. Sounds semi-safe to me
And you guys will need a window switch also.
problem is the N2O will be set waayyy back if I have to do headers and full exhaust..
CAI + intake manifold is not an issue, cat-back is pushing it, but header and dp just kills the deal. Sure it would be smart to do full bolt ons before N2O, but is it neccessary? idk
You for sure would need 91+? What would happen if you did this on 87? Crap, if you need 91 for N2O, i need a way to drain gas easily then...damn that sucks. No way to run on 87?
CAI + intake manifold is not an issue, cat-back is pushing it, but header and dp just kills the deal. Sure it would be smart to do full bolt ons before N2O, but is it neccessary? idk
You for sure would need 91+? What would happen if you did this on 87? Crap, if you need 91 for N2O, i need a way to drain gas easily then...damn that sucks. No way to run on 87?
problem is the N2O will be set waayyy back if I have to do headers and full exhaust..
CAI + intake manifold is not an issue, cat-back is pushing it, but header and dp just kills the deal. Sure it would be smart to do full bolt ons before N2O, but is it neccessary? idk
You for sure would need 91+? What would happen if you did this on 87? Crap, if you need 91 for N2O, i need a way to drain gas easily then...damn that sucks. No way to run on 87?
CAI + intake manifold is not an issue, cat-back is pushing it, but header and dp just kills the deal. Sure it would be smart to do full bolt ons before N2O, but is it neccessary? idk
You for sure would need 91+? What would happen if you did this on 87? Crap, if you need 91 for N2O, i need a way to drain gas easily then...damn that sucks. No way to run on 87?
YES you NEED to run 91 or higher. I always run 91 now just incase someone wants to run. It sucks to have to say, " give me 2 days to filter out this 87 and Ill walk you!"
are you crazy? you have to run high octane fuel with nitrous or else i is pointless. do you know how nitrous works? im not trying to bust you or anything man i just don't want anyone to be misinformed.
i've ran my ca with stock exhaust and just an intake the whole time and never had a problem with power. infact i prety much ran with a stock '05 mustang GT (pulled on me past 70mph, but like i said stock exhaust). If you get an exhaust...header back....even better. also, running larger piping with nitrous or F/I setups is better. without one of those, you will lose power, but once you hit that button....you will see what i'm talking about. im actually thinking about reinstalling mines again and maybe do a how-to. this time im doing header back, 2.4 intake manifold, and cam gears. i'm running stock rims but i have michelin pilot tires, so i don't have to worry too much about traction.
i've ran my ca with stock exhaust and just an intake the whole time and never had a problem with power. infact i prety much ran with a stock '05 mustang GT (pulled on me past 70mph, but like i said stock exhaust). If you get an exhaust...header back....even better. also, running larger piping with nitrous or F/I setups is better. without one of those, you will lose power, but once you hit that button....you will see what i'm talking about. im actually thinking about reinstalling mines again and maybe do a how-to. this time im doing header back, 2.4 intake manifold, and cam gears. i'm running stock rims but i have michelin pilot tires, so i don't have to worry too much about traction.
but i thought the nitrous let you burn more fuel by adding more colder and more air to the engine, so how would this make you need to run a higher octane? can you mix different octane fuels, say u got 1/4 tank of 87 and u put a 1/4 tank of 91+. i think i can actually get 93 and like 97 (they call it racing fuel, i think its 97) around here, but its expensive.
don't get me confused with a mechanic of any sorts..i know engine basics, and car maintence, thats about it. im just a driver really
but i thought the nitrous let you burn more fuel by adding more colder and more air to the engine, so how would this make you need to run a higher octane? can you mix different octane fuels, say u got 1/4 tank of 87 and u put a 1/4 tank of 91+. i think i can actually get 93 and like 97 (they call it racing fuel, i think its 97) around here, but its expensive.
but i thought the nitrous let you burn more fuel by adding more colder and more air to the engine, so how would this make you need to run a higher octane? can you mix different octane fuels, say u got 1/4 tank of 87 and u put a 1/4 tank of 91+. i think i can actually get 93 and like 97 (they call it racing fuel, i think its 97) around here, but its expensive.
edit: where's that guy that blew up his manifold..i'd take his advice, that cobalt was MEAN, until the plastic manifold killed his hood ;(
it happened becuase he was probably reving with the nitrous activated or something and it pooled with nitrous or fuel. if you have a window switch and a tps to only activate when at full throttle then you'll be perfectly safe. i was running my nitrous for like a year with no problems. 91+ octane just burns differently and nitrous adds more air to the mix added with better octane fuel and more fuel in a wet kit setup = more hp.
his best was a 14.69 and he ran a 16.43 stock...does that sound right? i would have thought he would of been able to run low 14s? wonder what size shot he was using. I'm looking to use either 50 or maybe 75. here is the other problem, there are no local places that will refill the N2O bottle..so what are my options?
Feright...I just realized that was you..didn't you have a blue Ion? Remember me from awhile ago, I asked you about N2O once before
Feright...I just realized that was you..didn't you have a blue Ion? Remember me from awhile ago, I asked you about N2O once before
Last edited by shawn672; Aug 24, 2007 at 09:34 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Honestly, I want to question something
Everyone says get 91 octane or higher
But Octane ratings is due to resist from detonation
What causes detonation?
- Lean fuel mixtures
- Ignition problems
- Excessive Heat
1. If he's doing a wet kit properly, lean isn't going to be a issue
2. I'm assuming that he has no ignition problems
#3 is the thing about nitrous. Nitrous injection LOWERS combustion chamber temperatures a great deal.
So someone tell me why exactly he would need a higher octane if all 3 things are accounted for?
Also note: Octane Ratings has nothing to do with power and has nothing to do with quality of burn, only resistance to detonation (or knocking).
To the original poster, check NGK for spark plugs. They make a 1 step colder plug for the L61 (I know this for sure). That's good enough if you truely wanted to do that.
Everyone says get 91 octane or higher
But Octane ratings is due to resist from detonation
What causes detonation?
- Lean fuel mixtures
- Ignition problems
- Excessive Heat
1. If he's doing a wet kit properly, lean isn't going to be a issue
2. I'm assuming that he has no ignition problems
#3 is the thing about nitrous. Nitrous injection LOWERS combustion chamber temperatures a great deal.
So someone tell me why exactly he would need a higher octane if all 3 things are accounted for?
Also note: Octane Ratings has nothing to do with power and has nothing to do with quality of burn, only resistance to detonation (or knocking).
To the original poster, check NGK for spark plugs. They make a 1 step colder plug for the L61 (I know this for sure). That's good enough if you truely wanted to do that.
Honestly, I want to question something
Everyone says get 91 octane or higher
But Octane ratings is due to resist from detonation
What causes detonation?
- Lean fuel mixtures
- Ignition problems
- Excessive Heat
1. If he's doing a wet kit properly, lean isn't going to be a issue
2. I'm assuming that he has no ignition problems
#3 is the thing about nitrous. Nitrous injection LOWERS combustion chamber temperatures a great deal.
So someone tell me why exactly he would need a higher octane if all 3 things are accounted for?
Also note: Octane Ratings has nothing to do with power and has nothing to do with quality of burn, only resistance to detonation (or knocking).
To the original poster, check NGK for spark plugs. They make a 1 step colder plug for the L61 (I know this for sure). That's good enough if you truely wanted to do that.
Everyone says get 91 octane or higher
But Octane ratings is due to resist from detonation
What causes detonation?
- Lean fuel mixtures
- Ignition problems
- Excessive Heat
1. If he's doing a wet kit properly, lean isn't going to be a issue
2. I'm assuming that he has no ignition problems
#3 is the thing about nitrous. Nitrous injection LOWERS combustion chamber temperatures a great deal.
So someone tell me why exactly he would need a higher octane if all 3 things are accounted for?
Also note: Octane Ratings has nothing to do with power and has nothing to do with quality of burn, only resistance to detonation (or knocking).
To the original poster, check NGK for spark plugs. They make a 1 step colder plug for the L61 (I know this for sure). That's good enough if you truely wanted to do that.


