ottp
05-11-2010, 05:25 AM
#102
Senior Member
iTrader: (-1)
Join Date: 08-01-07
Location: WestCoast
Posts: 6,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
is from the heart..your a ******* ******* troll ...that didnt get his way, now he's crying bout it ...your parents probly didnt tell you no very much...but thats real honest to agree to terms ....cause the chances are you didnt even read them....and now have your cc company cancel the order....god i hope ottp dang bangs your wife...she agreed to terms of marriage but didnt like them
his location says u.s....im tracking his i.p anyways
his location says u.s....im tracking his i.p anyways
Last edited by SlowBalt_06; 05-11-2010 at 05:25 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
05-11-2010, 05:25 AM
#103
Senior Member
Join Date: 08-10-08
Location: Washington
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this will never go to court. jesus christ! its over 50 bucks!!! after 10 minutes of a lawyers time you would already be over the 50 dollar mark making it a complete waste. court is not free, lawyers advice aint free.
plus the court would be set in Michigan cus thats where **** was purchased and odds r it would cost the OP a hellll of a lot more to get there for the day. never mind hotel, food and other expenses while there. pretty sure the OP is from Canada if he has a corporate job at RIM. plus he would lose the opportunity cost of missing a day of work, which would pay more than the 50 bucks he would lose if he went to court. which he would lose cus he agreed to their terms. courts dont feel sorry for you for not reading a contract...
plus the court would be set in Michigan cus thats where **** was purchased and odds r it would cost the OP a hellll of a lot more to get there for the day. never mind hotel, food and other expenses while there. pretty sure the OP is from Canada if he has a corporate job at RIM. plus he would lose the opportunity cost of missing a day of work, which would pay more than the 50 bucks he would lose if he went to court. which he would lose cus he agreed to their terms. courts dont feel sorry for you for not reading a contract...
05-11-2010, 05:26 AM
#105
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: 10-01-09
Location: Boring ass Columbus Ohio
Posts: 11,498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
is from the heart..your a ******* ******* troll ...that didnt get his way, now he's crying bout it ...your parents probly didnt tell you no very much...but thats real honest to agree to terms ....cause the chances are you didnt even read them....and now have your cc company cancel the order....god i hope ottp dang bangs your wife...she agreed to terms of marriage but didnt like them
his location says u.s....im tracking his i.p anyways
his location says u.s....im tracking his i.p anyways
05-11-2010, 05:26 AM
#106
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: 01-19-10
Location: us
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you're right they won't care i didnt read that contract but is it so wrong for me to ask ottp to change it or maybe rally a little support to get a small change to not include non stock items in it ?
05-11-2010, 05:26 AM
#108
Senior Member
Join Date: 08-10-08
Location: Washington
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
is from the heart..your a ******* ******* troll ...that didnt get his way, now he's crying bout it ...your parents probly didnt tell you no very much...but thats real honest to agree to terms ....cause the chances are you didnt even read them....and now have your cc company cancel the order....god i hope ottp dang bangs your wife...she agreed to terms of marriage but didnt like them
his location says u.s....im tracking his i.p anyways
his location says u.s....im tracking his i.p anyways
lol such lies.
if u can find his ip let me know mine why dont ya?
05-11-2010, 05:27 AM
#111
Senior Member
Join Date: 08-10-08
Location: Washington
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05-11-2010, 05:28 AM
#112
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: 01-19-10
Location: us
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MY last words so bash away if your under 17 -----
" is it so wrong for me to ask ottp to change it or maybe rally a little support to get a small change to not include non stock items in it ?
"
" is it so wrong for me to ask ottp to change it or maybe rally a little support to get a small change to not include non stock items in it ?
"
05-11-2010, 05:29 AM
#114
New Member
Join Date: 09-04-07
Location: galesburg, IL
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no one else changes there policys from this so why start now. 99 percent of companys have this
05-11-2010, 05:29 AM
#115
Senior Member
Join Date: 08-10-08
Location: Washington
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
but companies charge this because their employees still had to work even if its just a little bit to get your order done.
05-11-2010, 05:31 AM
#118
New Member
Join Date: 09-04-07
Location: galesburg, IL
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05-11-2010, 05:33 AM
#120
Senior Member
Join Date: 08-10-08
Location: Washington
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol i know how to get peoples ip but i seriously doubt you do. As it only takes about 2-3 seconds to get someones ip address.
nonetheless i think hes gone. so thread is dying
nonetheless i think hes gone. so thread is dying
05-11-2010, 05:34 AM
#121
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-20-06
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05-11-2010, 05:36 AM
#123
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-20-08
Location: Where Hoffa remains
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the mods should delete this thread for the simple fact of the promotion of CC fraud.
in the LS1 part joemama did it I can see, but you sir, are just a thief.
05-11-2010, 05:39 AM
#125
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 04-19-08
Location: Drayton Valley AB
Posts: 4,357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i couldnt imagine having a judge yell at you for being a retard for something like this.
also i dont think they could reverse/dispute the credit card transaction bcus they refunded a different amount. the one guy in his claim made it sound like they charged an extra fee, which was not authorized as his restocking fee, which was properly refunded. as in they charged the charged the card a second time. I really dont see a credit card company placing more money into his account for this. They would have to go for the first transaction which was authorized so they wouldnt be able to reverse that.