Supercharged G5 Dyno results an video
1.I went to your web site and can not seem to find where you guys are located?
I have no problem driving if within like 8-10 hours away to get this stuff installed.
2.Also since you have this are you going to be offering something like a trade in for stock ss/sc injectors when they upgrade to another stage from you guys so we can pick them up from you.
And if they go twin screw or turbo a trade in on their stock items?
3. Will you be porting the blowers or anything else? I wish i could see the youtube but i am at work and its blocked and i am going TDY soon and took down my home internet....
I have no problem driving if within like 8-10 hours away to get this stuff installed.
2.Also since you have this are you going to be offering something like a trade in for stock ss/sc injectors when they upgrade to another stage from you guys so we can pick them up from you.
And if they go twin screw or turbo a trade in on their stock items?
3. Will you be porting the blowers or anything else? I wish i could see the youtube but i am at work and its blocked and i am going TDY soon and took down my home internet....
We are located in Toronto, Canada
We can trade injectors if we have someone who wants them.
We will not be porting the blower, but you can run a smaller pulley if you want more boost. Remember this was the stock 3.35" pulley of the 2.0L.
The G5 was a manual, but I don't see why it wouldn't work on a auto.
The engine is good up to 250hp as I read it but there are some differences between the LSJ and the 2.4
CrankshaftThe 2.2 and 2.4s have a cast iron crank while the LSJ crankshaft is a forged steel design that incorporates induction heat treated fillets for added strength and cross drilled, chamfered oil passages for excellent lubrication characteristics.
Rods
The 2.2 and 2.4 come with powdered steel rods. The LSJ have forged steel large I beam rods.
Pistons
All ecotech engines come with eutetic cast aluminum pistons. The
common pistons in the Supercharged and Turbocharged Ecotec engines have a 5.6 mm top ring land, much thicker crown & strut sections, coupled to a heavy walled 23 mm piston pin.
CrankshaftThe 2.2 and 2.4s have a cast iron crank while the LSJ crankshaft is a forged steel design that incorporates induction heat treated fillets for added strength and cross drilled, chamfered oil passages for excellent lubrication characteristics.
Rods
The 2.2 and 2.4 come with powdered steel rods. The LSJ have forged steel large I beam rods.
Pistons
All ecotech engines come with eutetic cast aluminum pistons. The
common pistons in the Supercharged and Turbocharged Ecotec engines have a 5.6 mm top ring land, much thicker crown & strut sections, coupled to a heavy walled 23 mm piston pin.
just to let u guys know Hahn got the 2.4 l up to 350 whp on the soltices on stock internal and the claim it s holding it without any problem
and for what my gm teck told me the motor built to take up to 400 did not specify whp or motor ....
and the rods on the 2.4 are forge
and for what my gm teck told me the motor built to take up to 400 did not specify whp or motor ....
and the rods on the 2.4 are forge
I can't say no to that and be 100% sure but this was a quote directly from the Ecotech LSJ Builders Guide.
All from the Ecotech LSJ Builders Guide located at GM Tunersource

Last edited by shadowfaxss; Jul 25, 2007 at 10:33 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
2.4s FTW!!! i can't wait to see some angry 2.0s
a TS would probably make 350 considering rebel's TS kit should make 300-350 whp on the lsj..hell the m62 would even have a shot at it since it's only running at 7.5psi and pushing 220 WHP... at 12 PSI it should push out around 270WHP or so. If you think about it it's pushing out as much HP with 3/4 of the psi as a stock ss/sc and some of those are pushing 280 the possibilities are endless. I'd like to see how much a 2.4 can take with the m62 until it breaks, just so i know that my build will be able to take more 
I'm not necessarily looking to do this.. unless it's dirt cheap then what the hell why not haha.. however i'm ecstatic that some possibilities are coming out.
why would the lsj build guide talk about the 2.4?? i've read it before and never seen anything of that sort... and i've always heard that 90% of the of the lsj and 2.4 internals are the same... i actually had a site that compare the two o verify that as well... i'll see if i can find it...
regardless... from what i've spoke to with hahn their solstice is pushing 408 HP so thats good news
I'm not necessarily looking to do this.. unless it's dirt cheap then what the hell why not haha.. however i'm ecstatic that some possibilities are coming out.
why would the lsj build guide talk about the 2.4?? i've read it before and never seen anything of that sort... and i've always heard that 90% of the of the lsj and 2.4 internals are the same... i actually had a site that compare the two o verify that as well... i'll see if i can find it...
regardless... from what i've spoke to with hahn their solstice is pushing 408 HP so thats good news
Last edited by elecblue06; Jul 25, 2007 at 10:53 AM.
We are located in Toronto, Canada
We can trade injectors if we have someone who wants them.
We will not be porting the blower, but you can run a smaller pulley if you want more boost. Remember this was the stock 3.35" pulley of the 2.0L.
The G5 was a manual, but I don't see why it wouldn't work on a auto.
We can trade injectors if we have someone who wants them.
We will not be porting the blower, but you can run a smaller pulley if you want more boost. Remember this was the stock 3.35" pulley of the 2.0L.
The G5 was a manual, but I don't see why it wouldn't work on a auto.
Its wrong. Here you go, just went to a GM website and found this...
2007 2.4l I4 VVT (LE5)
Materials:
Block: Cast aluminum
Cylinder head: Cast aluminum
Intake Manifold: Compoiste
Exhaust Manifold: High Silicon Molybdenum; Cast Nodular Iron
Main Bearing Caps: Aluminum Bedplate
Crankshaft: Cast Nodular Iron
Camshaft: Cast Nodular Iron
Conecting Rods: Forged Steel
Heres the link.
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...2007/07car.htm
Let me know if you can't find it. This BTW is in line with everything else I've read about the 2.4. Thats the first time I've ever seen anyone claim it has powered rods. They're just wrong is all.
The only difference according to this is the crackshaft in the 2.0 is forged and ours is cast. doesn't say anything about the pistons but thats common knowledge.
2007 2.4l I4 VVT (LE5)
Materials:
Block: Cast aluminum
Cylinder head: Cast aluminum
Intake Manifold: Compoiste
Exhaust Manifold: High Silicon Molybdenum; Cast Nodular Iron
Main Bearing Caps: Aluminum Bedplate
Crankshaft: Cast Nodular Iron
Camshaft: Cast Nodular Iron
Conecting Rods: Forged Steel
Heres the link.
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...2007/07car.htm
Let me know if you can't find it. This BTW is in line with everything else I've read about the 2.4. Thats the first time I've ever seen anyone claim it has powered rods. They're just wrong is all.
The only difference according to this is the crackshaft in the 2.0 is forged and ours is cast. doesn't say anything about the pistons but thats common knowledge.
Its wrong. Here you go, just went to a GM website and found this...
2007 2.4l I4 VVT (LE5)
Materials:
Block: Cast aluminum
Cylinder head: Cast aluminum
Intake Manifold: Compoiste
Exhaust Manifold: High Silicon Molybdenum; Cast Nodular Iron
Main Bearing Caps: Aluminum Bedplate
Crankshaft: Cast Nodular Iron
Camshaft: Cast Nodular Iron
Conecting Rods: Forged Steel
Heres the link.
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...2007/07car.htm
Let me know if you can't find it. This BTW is in line with everything else I've read about the 2.4. Thats the first time I've ever seen anyone claim it has powered rods. They're just wrong is all.
The only difference according to this is the crackshaft in the 2.0 is forged and ours is cast. doesn't say anything about the pistons but thats common knowledge.
2007 2.4l I4 VVT (LE5)
Materials:
Block: Cast aluminum
Cylinder head: Cast aluminum
Intake Manifold: Compoiste
Exhaust Manifold: High Silicon Molybdenum; Cast Nodular Iron
Main Bearing Caps: Aluminum Bedplate
Crankshaft: Cast Nodular Iron
Camshaft: Cast Nodular Iron
Conecting Rods: Forged Steel
Heres the link.
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...2007/07car.htm
Let me know if you can't find it. This BTW is in line with everything else I've read about the 2.4. Thats the first time I've ever seen anyone claim it has powered rods. They're just wrong is all.
The only difference according to this is the crackshaft in the 2.0 is forged and ours is cast. doesn't say anything about the pistons but thats common knowledge.
Displacement: 1998 cc
Bore x Stroke: 86 mm x 86 mm
Valvetrain:
Dual overhead camshafts
4 valves per cylinder
Valve Lifters: Hydraulic roller finger follower
Compression Ratio: 9.5:1
Firing Order: 1-3-4-2
Fuel System: Sequential fuel injection with
high pressure (56 psi)
Recommended Fuel: Premium
Peak Horsepower: 205 hp (153 kW) @ 5600 rpm
Peak Torque: 200 lb-ft (271 Nm) @ 4400 rpm
Manufactured: Kaiserslautern, Germany
MATERIALS:
Cylinder Block: Cast aluminum with cast iron cylinder liners
Cylinder Head: Cast aluminum
Crankshaft: Forged steel with induction-hardened fillet
Camshaft: Cast iron
Connecting Rods: Forged steel
Intake Manifold: Aluminum
Exhaust Manifold: Cast iron
COMPONENT DESCRIPTIONS:
Throttle Type: Electronic throttle control
Ignition System: Coil-on-plug
_________________________
just to put everything up next to eachother for comparison since you got to it before me
We are located in Toronto, Canada
We can trade injectors if we have someone who wants them.
We will not be porting the blower, but you can run a smaller pulley if you want more boost. Remember this was the stock 3.35" pulley of the 2.0L.
The G5 was a manual, but I don't see why it wouldn't work on a auto.
We can trade injectors if we have someone who wants them.
We will not be porting the blower, but you can run a smaller pulley if you want more boost. Remember this was the stock 3.35" pulley of the 2.0L.
The G5 was a manual, but I don't see why it wouldn't work on a auto.
Thats cool I was wondering.
Yeah it looks like the crank and pistons are the only difference. And a cast crank can hold TONS of power no problem, true forged is better but ours isn't exactly crap.
Just glad that site was wrong about our rods being powdered like the 2.2 is. That was the first I'd seen any place say we had powdered rods so I knew it had to be wrong, I just wanted to be able to post some conformation to back me up.
Pretty sure that won't fly!
yea this route seems way better then the 4,000+ price tag on the turbo....if you look at the other ecotec supercharger kits they run 2,500 and i have no problem paying that for a bolt on kit ready to be installed in a couple hours....**** if i can pick up some used parts and get the kit for 1,500 i'll send my check now......
Guys.... Hahn has already beat the 2.4 up on the Solstice. It is running 19psi making 330+whp. The 2.4 can handle a TwinScrew no problem. I dont know why you guys are saying you need to replace the internals to run it. I relaly wouldnt be surprised if you put down over 300whp with the same pulley size thats included in the 2.0 TwinScrew kit.
Also to clear something else up with the m62. STOP LOOKING AT PSI NUMBERS. 7.5psi on the 2.4 is still moving the same amount of CFM as 12psi on the 2.0. The roots charger builds pressure inside the manifold. Since your engine flows a lot differently, it wont build the same amount of pressure inside the manifold as the 2.0. What im saying is, you arent going to reach the 19 or 20psi mark on the m62. Your going to maybe make 14psi on a 2.5 pulley. Why? Because your still spinning the blower at the same speed as it was spinning on the 2.0 and making the same amount of CFM. Power is made by CFM, not Boost.
Though on a positive note, you will make less heat on the same size pulley because the blower isnt trying to cram as much air into the manifold. Which means more power.
Great job on puting this project together Rebel. Its about time someone shows the community its possible.
Also to clear something else up with the m62. STOP LOOKING AT PSI NUMBERS. 7.5psi on the 2.4 is still moving the same amount of CFM as 12psi on the 2.0. The roots charger builds pressure inside the manifold. Since your engine flows a lot differently, it wont build the same amount of pressure inside the manifold as the 2.0. What im saying is, you arent going to reach the 19 or 20psi mark on the m62. Your going to maybe make 14psi on a 2.5 pulley. Why? Because your still spinning the blower at the same speed as it was spinning on the 2.0 and making the same amount of CFM. Power is made by CFM, not Boost.
Though on a positive note, you will make less heat on the same size pulley because the blower isnt trying to cram as much air into the manifold. Which means more power.
Great job on puting this project together Rebel. Its about time someone shows the community its possible.
Guys.... Hahn has already beat the 2.4 up on the Solstice. It is running 19psi making 330+whp. The 2.4 can handle a TwinScrew no problem. I dont know why you guys are saying you need to replace the internals to run it. I relaly wouldnt be surprised if you put down over 300whp with the same pulley size thats included in the 2.0 TwinScrew kit.
Also to clear something else up with the m62. STOP LOOKING AT PSI NUMBERS. 7.5psi on the 2.4 is still moving the same amount of CFM as 12psi on the 2.0. The roots charger builds pressure inside the manifold. Since your engine flows a lot differently, it wont build the same amount of pressure inside the manifold as the 2.0. What im saying is, you arent going to reach the 19 or 20psi mark on the m62. Your going to maybe make 14psi on a 2.5 pulley. Why? Because your still spinning the blower at the same speed as it was spinning on the 2.0 and making the same amount of CFM. Power is made by CFM, not Boost.
Though on a positive note, you will make less heat on the same size pulley because the blower isnt trying to cram as much air into the manifold. Which means more power.
Great job on puting this project together Rebel. Its about time someone shows the community its possible.
Also to clear something else up with the m62. STOP LOOKING AT PSI NUMBERS. 7.5psi on the 2.4 is still moving the same amount of CFM as 12psi on the 2.0. The roots charger builds pressure inside the manifold. Since your engine flows a lot differently, it wont build the same amount of pressure inside the manifold as the 2.0. What im saying is, you arent going to reach the 19 or 20psi mark on the m62. Your going to maybe make 14psi on a 2.5 pulley. Why? Because your still spinning the blower at the same speed as it was spinning on the 2.0 and making the same amount of CFM. Power is made by CFM, not Boost.
Though on a positive note, you will make less heat on the same size pulley because the blower isnt trying to cram as much air into the manifold. Which means more power.
Great job on puting this project together Rebel. Its about time someone shows the community its possible.
Man, that's sick. I'd love to supercharge my 2.4 someday, but I'd still rather use a centifrugal supercharger like a Procharger. Someone needs to get that Speed Mafia Procharger kit for the 2.2 Ion and fab it up for a 2.4SS, tune it with HP Tuners, and then post the results up.
Price for a kit with all new parts:
alternator $351.98
Eaton M62 $1087
lower intake manifold $532
Cobra Heat Exchanger $200
Bosch IC Pump $80
fitting and piping $60
GM stage 2 belt $40
ribbed idler $30
intercooler surge tank $65
intake you can use the GMPP for the 2.4L or see below
parts we will fabricate:
additional idler with bracket $150
IC pump bracket $100
CAI for M62 $250
So a grand total of $2945.98US with all new parts
Tuning will be an extra $250US
alternator $351.98
Eaton M62 $1087
lower intake manifold $532
Cobra Heat Exchanger $200
Bosch IC Pump $80
fitting and piping $60
GM stage 2 belt $40
ribbed idler $30
intercooler surge tank $65
intake you can use the GMPP for the 2.4L or see below
parts we will fabricate:
additional idler with bracket $150
IC pump bracket $100
CAI for M62 $250
So a grand total of $2945.98US with all new parts
Tuning will be an extra $250US
Man, that's sick. I'd love to supercharge my 2.4 someday, but I'd still rather use a centifrugal supercharger like a Procharger. Someone needs to get that Speed Mafia Procharger kit for the 2.2 Ion and fab it up for a 2.4SS, tune it with HP Tuners, and then post the results up.
guys, i would recommend buying the TS kit for the 2.0 and buy the lower intake manifold used or from GM and you would have 300+whp off the bat. The engine can easily handle it. It may cost you about 1k more,but you would have an extra 90-100whp and installation is the same.
well id have to say that that sounds pretty good for a supercharger kit....and i suppose we could get that stuff way cheaper if we were able to find a totaled ss/sc somewhere or something.....would you be able to go more in depth on the tuning?
Price for a kit with all new parts:
alternator $351.98
Eaton M62 $1087
lower intake manifold $532
Cobra Heat Exchanger $200
Bosch IC Pump $80
fitting and piping $60
GM stage 2 belt $40
ribbed idler $30
intercooler surge tank $65
intake you can use the GMPP for the 2.4L or see below
parts we will fabricate:
additional idler with bracket $150
IC pump bracket $100
CAI for M62 $250
So a grand total of $2945.98US with all new parts
Tuning will be an extra $250US
alternator $351.98
Eaton M62 $1087
lower intake manifold $532
Cobra Heat Exchanger $200
Bosch IC Pump $80
fitting and piping $60
GM stage 2 belt $40
ribbed idler $30
intercooler surge tank $65
intake you can use the GMPP for the 2.4L or see below
parts we will fabricate:
additional idler with bracket $150
IC pump bracket $100
CAI for M62 $250
So a grand total of $2945.98US with all new parts
Tuning will be an extra $250US


