Suspension Springs, Shocks, Brakes

Brakes not looking so new

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 02:40 PM
  #1  
dimeo09's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 03-08-05
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: NY
Brakes not looking so new

Ive recently noticed that my front rotors arent too smooth, the more i drive the deeper the grooves get in my rotors..... anyone else notice this....

also on a side issue, i dont use 100% brakes, I engine brake my car(downshift) so im wondering how my rotors could possibly look this bad
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 02:55 PM
  #2  
TimDang's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-22-05
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: Greensburg, PA
Compression braking is bad for your clutch, brakes are cheaper than a clutch, so use your brakes
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 03:05 PM
  #3  
MarcS's Avatar
The Stig
 
Joined: 05-11-05
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 1
From: New York
Originally Posted by TimDang
Compression braking is bad for your clutch, brakes are cheaper than a clutch, so use your brakes
Technically using your clutch is 'bad for your clutch'.

Using the transmission/engine to slow down is normal when driving a standard and won't put any excessive strain on the clutch.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 03:07 PM
  #4  
mcz34man's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-28-04
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Toledo, Ohio
my rotors look like **** too and i engine brake, ive got 13000 miles on the rotors who knows
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 03:22 PM
  #5  
c7015's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-02-05
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: London
Originally Posted by MarcS
Technically using your clutch is 'bad for your clutch'.

Using the transmission/engine to slow down is normal when driving a standard and won't put any excessive strain on the clutch.

Actually its almost unanimously agreed in the automotive community that engine braking is no the way to go because it will cost you more (brakes being a cheap fix relative to clutch)

The only time engine breaking is recommended is on a long downhill slope
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 03:38 PM
  #6  
Ljavy17's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-01-05
Posts: 3,622
Likes: 0
From: Miami
I alraedy had to take my car in because it threw the break fluid light. They had to refill my brake fluid. But im guessing this was because since i was used to automatic cars i always held the brake when i was stopped.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 04:20 PM
  #7  
MarcS's Avatar
The Stig
 
Joined: 05-11-05
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 1
From: New York
Originally Posted by c7015
Actually its almost unanimously agreed in the automotive community that engine braking is no the way to go because it will cost you more (brakes being a cheap fix relative to clutch)

The only time engine breaking is recommended is on a long downhill slope
I have to agree with you that breaks are cheaper when they are OEM. If you decide to get better pads and rotors then it will not be as cost effective.

I will still say that engine breaking is better than *just* using the breaks and free-wheeling (if that’s what you implied). Utilizing both is what I would say is most efficient.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 05:36 PM
  #8  
Permafried-'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-21-05
Posts: 5,060
Likes: 0
From: London, Ontario
Originally Posted by c7015
Actually its almost unanimously agreed in the automotive community that engine braking is no the way to go because it will cost you more (brakes being a cheap fix relative to clutch)

The only time engine breaking is recommended is on a long downhill slope
I mix it up...I downshift and gently apply the brakes to help the car slow...I'm so used to it it feels strange when I just apply the brakes and don't downshift the car, I feel like I'm pushing my foot through the floor or putting excess pressure on the pedal. It also seems to feel like the car isn't stopping fast enough. I also likes the fact that it takes the guess work out of picking a gear when you're slowing down behind traffic at a light and they begin to move again...just means I have to think less . I'm well aware it's putting excess wear on my clutch which as you mentioned is not a cheap repair but if it can't stand up to the very day driving when manufacturers know people downshift then a repair job on it would be pretty much inevitable even w/o downshifting...I think I'm just stubborn .

As for the grooves, make sure that your break pads are not rubbing on your rotors during normal operation without the brakes applied. A few people have mentioned that their brake pads were dragging on the rotors but I've also seen mention of normal every day braking causing the grooves on the rotors.

Permafried-
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 05:38 PM
  #9  
MarcS's Avatar
The Stig
 
Joined: 05-11-05
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 1
From: New York
Originally Posted by Permafried-
I mix it up...I downshift and gently apply the brakes to help the car slow...I'm so used to it it feels strange when I just apply the brakes and don't downshift the car, I feel like I'm pushing my foot through the floor or putting excess pressure on the pedal. It also seems to feel like the car isn't stopping fast enough. I also likes the fact that it takes the guess work out of picking a gear when you're slowing down behind traffic at a light and they begin to move again...just means I have to think less . I'm well aware it's putting excess wear on my clutch which as you mentioned is not a cheap repair but if it can't stand up to the very day driving when manufacturers know people downshift then a repair job on it would be pretty much inevitable even w/o downshifting...I think I'm just stubborn .

As for the grooves, make sure that your break pads are not rubbing on your rotors during normal operation without the brakes applied. A few people have mentioned that their brake pads were dragging on the rotors but I've also seen mention of normal every day braking causing the grooves on the rotors.

Permafried-
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 06:57 PM
  #10  
c7015's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-02-05
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: London
Originally Posted by MarcS
I have to agree with you that breaks are cheaper when they are OEM. If you decide to get better pads and rotors then it will not be as cost effective.

I will still say that engine breaking is better than *just* using the breaks and free-wheeling (if that’s what you implied). Utilizing both is what I would say is most efficient.

Agree...I try not to make any serrious downshifts ...I will drag the gears out as I come to a light if I have time ...but I wont make a point of having my drivetrain stop me in a hurry
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 07:34 PM
  #11  
wesmanw02's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-13-04
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by c7015
Actually its almost unanimously agreed in the automotive community that engine braking is no the way to go because it will cost you more (brakes being a cheap fix relative to clutch)

The only time engine breaking is recommended is on a long downhill slope
Definitely not. The proper way to drive stick shift is to gear down as you use the brakes to slow the vehicle down. If you are actually good at it (a lot of people aren't) and downshift at the correct RPM's, the downshifts are seemless, yet still help you maintain speed and slow the car down gradually. You can also match revs on downshifts, which creates zero wear on the clutch, instead of a neglibeable amount

Its actually a hazard if you don't gear down at your speed decreases. Say you are cruising in 5th, and slow down for traffic to 20MPH (clutch in). If you suddenly need to move (say to get out of someones way whos not paying attention) you will either have to try and downshift to 1st very quickly or just stall it and get hit. Being in the right gear for your speed is important, the clutch wear is extremely negligeable

Don't pull that BS about "excessive clutch wear" due to normal downshifting - my family had a 1990 Accord 5-speed, and both of my parents downshifted reasonably when coming to a stop, and at 200,000 miles it was still on the original clutch.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 07:37 PM
  #12  
dimeo09's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 03-08-05
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: NY
I also do a mix, I downshift at lowerer rpm's and brake at the same time, so im def not straining my engine
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 08:05 PM
  #13  
Permafried-'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-21-05
Posts: 5,060
Likes: 0
From: London, Ontario
Originally Posted by c7015
Agree...I try not to make any serrious downshifts ...I will drag the gears out as I come to a light if I have time ...but I wont make a point of having my drivetrain stop me in a hurry
Ditto...if I have to stop in a hurry because of traffic or a yellow light it's clutch in and hit the brakes...no point in attempting to downshift just for the sake of downshifting .

Permafried-
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
KMO43
Front Page News
33
Jan 12, 2016 12:01 AM
biniecki
Problems/Service/Maintenance
8
Oct 25, 2015 02:23 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
Sep 27, 2015 08:53 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:28 PM.