2009 SS/TC vs TT 300zx
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-14-09
Location: New England
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#31
Senior Member
#32
#33
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 02-26-08
Location: Missouri
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good kill. My buddy in flying up to north carolina on friday to pick up a 95 tt 300zx 5 spd. It looks pretty sick its silver with dark rims and only has 50k miles on it. We're definatley going to run when he gets back but im pretty sure he'll have me covered.
#35
Keep thinking that, must be your first "quick" car. Look around a little, watch a few vids and you will see why I said that. Most everyone agrees, it's a fact, and it all begins with that cute little turbo on the car...
Tyler
Last edited by amxguy1970; 03-02-2010 at 10:25 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#36
My first quick car?? LOL, you don't have a clue. This car is my daily driver. My other car is a 400HP F-body.
#38
Details on the F-bod? N/A, spray, forced?
Tyler
#39
My money is on the latter.
#40
Naturally aspirated. Slow?? No. I don't know what you're comparing to, but as I said, my TC pulls strongly from 70-130MPH considering its engine size and HP. Obviously my other car is faster.
Last edited by 08SSTCRD; 03-02-2010 at 02:47 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#41
You'd like that wouldn't you. I'm not going to give you the time of day. Couldn't care less what you think.
Naturally aspirated. Slow?? No. I don't know what you're comparing to, but as I said, my TC pulls strongly from 70-130MPH considering its engine size and HP. Obviously my other car is faster.
Naturally aspirated. Slow?? No. I don't know what you're comparing to, but as I said, my TC pulls strongly from 70-130MPH considering its engine size and HP. Obviously my other car is faster.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post