War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

Stock Nissan Maxima V6 vs 06 SS S/C

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 01:18 PM
  #51  
Cobalt_SSTuner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-30-06
Posts: 14,899
Likes: 0
From: J-Town, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by scstang
if you guys are losing sleep and causing three pages of nonsense debates about maximas and altimas you should sell your car
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 01:44 PM
  #52  
SS4ME's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-13-05
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
From: WI
Originally Posted by Wleee
If I could I would.. but I'm stuck for another few years with it.. so I continue to be nice with it so it doesn't explode on me, then I will turn it in and never look back..
Please get rid of it! We don't need a wuss who thinks he's going blow his engine up by giving her a little!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 10:37 PM
  #53  
scstang's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-20-06
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: whorehouse
Originally Posted by Cobalt_SSTuner
nice doodle, how old are you 15. and no i did not sign up just to make that post. i signed up because i like the sc ss and wouldnt mind chatting about it with people who have faith in the sc ss and are not afraid of a pos altima.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 10:44 PM
  #54  
BlackedOutCoby's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 12-29-06
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: D/FW-(Grapevine area)
Former Nissan owner here. Ive had a 94 Sentra SE-R with a SR20DET setup putting down 255whp 216lb/tq Was running 13.17 1/4 miles before it caught on fire.

Also had a 2000 Altima limited Nismo edition # 17 of 20. Nothing special just different body kit, wheels, suspension, exhaust, intake, throttle body, agressive cam profile, and agressive tune. Only ran about a 14.9 1/4 mile. Bought it off the showroom floor in 2000 for $27,000.

The SS/SC's are quick in their own respect and probably faster stock then the new Maximas. I bet the new Altima is even of faster then a SS/SC stock. But the big difference here is quality. Nissan makes quality cars. GM doesnt. Its that simple. The quality of parts, and the attention to interior detail would lead me to choose a new Nissan over a new GM after my experiences with Chevy. I will never buy another Chevy. In fact I pray every day someone will just total my car so I can get out from under it. I really really wanna get another SE-R (newer model) or maybe a Talon TSI.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 10:49 PM
  #55  
LaserblueSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-24-06
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
From: Henry county, Ga
the SE-R is no joke. super nice cars, and decently fast. i wouldnt be surprised if he was able to beat a ss/sc.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 10:52 PM
  #56  
boostbalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-04-06
Posts: 862
Likes: 3
From: Canada
On the highway I've seen a stock ss/sc easily out perform a 3.5L Altima from about 60 km/h to 120 km/h.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 04:19 AM
  #57  
Wleee's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 11-28-06
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: w
Originally Posted by SS4ME
Please get rid of it! We don't need a wuss who thinks he's going blow his engine up by giving her a little!
i meant it sarcastically.. sorry i thought i put smilee in.. my bad.. lol.. i love my car man..

and no no, i aint' blowin' ****.. i am just nice to it in case if I do give it back, it isn't pumelled to **** for the next owner.. i'm nice with things i own..
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 09:38 AM
  #58  
SS4ME's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-13-05
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
From: WI
Originally Posted by Wleee
i meant it sarcastically.. sorry i thought i put smilee in.. my bad.. lol.. i love my car man..

and no no, i aint' blowin' ****.. i am just nice to it in case if I do give it back, it isn't pumelled to **** for the next owner.. i'm nice with things i own..
Sorry I didn't pick up on your E-sarcasm!

Last edited by SS4ME; Jan 11, 2007 at 12:52 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 11:58 AM
  #59  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by BlackedOutCoby
Former Nissan owner here. Ive had a 94 Sentra SE-R with a SR20DET setup putting down 255whp 216lb/tq Was running 13.17 1/4 miles before it caught on fire.

Also had a 2000 Altima limited Nismo edition # 17 of 20. Nothing special just different body kit, wheels, suspension, exhaust, intake, throttle body, agressive cam profile, and agressive tune. Only ran about a 14.9 1/4 mile. Bought it off the showroom floor in 2000 for $27,000.

The SS/SC's are quick in their own respect and probably faster stock then the new Maximas. I bet the new Altima is even of faster then a SS/SC stock. But the big difference here is quality. Nissan makes quality cars. GM doesnt. Its that simple. The quality of parts, and the attention to interior detail would lead me to choose a new Nissan over a new GM after my experiences with Chevy. I will never buy another Chevy. In fact I pray every day someone will just total my car so I can get out from under it. I really really wanna get another SE-R (newer model) or maybe a Talon TSI.
i agree with the quality part... the new maximas are not touched by the cobalt... a coworker has one, and the inside is really, really nice... that's the advantage of paying 37,000 for a new car though...
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 11:59 AM
  #60  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by scstang
nice doodle, how old are you 15. and no i did not sign up just to make that post. i signed up because i like the sc ss and wouldnt mind chatting about it with people who have faith in the sc ss and are not afraid of a pos altima.
haha... i doubt anyone is "afraid" of an altima... anyways, welcome to th esite
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 12:57 PM
  #61  
EthensCobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-21-06
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Raceland, LA
Originally Posted by SS-=MKR=-SS
its ****** slow, if u can drive worth **** u shouldnt have any problems.
ill agree with this guy ............ think about it the Z from a dig cant even burn us and that car is waaaaaaay faster than the maxi
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 01:05 PM
  #62  
shake&bake's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-08-07
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Canuckland
Originally Posted by EthensCobalt
ill agree with this guy ............ think about it the Z from a dig cant even burn us and that car is waaaaaaay faster than the maxi
Z cars are capable of mid-high 13s.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 01:11 PM
  #63  
SSteveSC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: 02-26-06
Posts: 944
Likes: 0
From: Ontario Canada
v6 altimas run high 14's.. my dad had a g35 sedan (same motor v6 3.5l) and it would run 14.7s (according to car and driver).
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 01:13 PM
  #64  
shake&bake's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-08-07
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Canuckland
Originally Posted by SSteveSC
v6 altimas run high 14's.. my dad had a g35 sedan (same motor v6 3.5l) and it would run 14.7s (according to car and driver).
And some magazines ran 15s with the SS/SC.

Some Altimas just like some SS/SCs have ran very low 14s.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 01:16 PM
  #65  
SS4ME's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-13-05
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
From: WI
Originally Posted by SSteveSC
v6 altimas run high 14's.. my dad had a g35 sedan (same motor v6 3.5l) and it would run 14.7s (according to car and driver).
Magazine raing is lame! An Altima is no slouch. They run similar times to the SS/SC so if you are not on your game you will lose!!!
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 09:31 PM
  #66  
pjk91's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-07-05
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 0
From: San Pedro/PV
so did the race happen yet? its been awhile
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2007 | 05:24 PM
  #67  
scstang's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-20-06
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: whorehouse
Originally Posted by shake&bake
Z cars are capable of mid-high 13s.
not stock. imports are known to exagerate there hp output and track times.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2007 | 06:00 PM
  #68  
an0malous's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-06
Posts: 12,577
Likes: 2
From: Canada
I was about to tell you to be very careful dissagreeing with anything that guy says.....its like opening pandoras box.


and then i noticed.....hes banned again

Roffel&pancakes

anyone got the scoop on his new name yet?
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2007 | 07:44 PM
  #69  
8cd03gro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-06
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: .
mid 13's....no

high 13's...yes


i have seen a FEW 350z's run high 13's. the manual z's can run 13's with a good driver, i don't think the autos ever will. you guys forget that most other cars come in manual AND automatic.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2007 | 07:50 PM
  #70  
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-06
Posts: 5,577
Likes: 3
From: Gainesville, FL
ehhh, i worked for nissan USA, and i disagree about the quality thing. i don't think that nissan is anything special, in fact, i'd probably not buy one due to a few major issues that i've seen.

for 37k, there is a lot more car to be had for the money than a max.

back to the racing thing, i think a max would probably take a SS S/C, they're not slow.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2007 | 08:38 PM
  #71  
MoMoney's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-11-07
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: OK
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html

MotorTrend got a 13.77.

http://www.my350z.com/forum/showpost...15&postcount=6
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2007 | 11:29 PM
  #72  
SSteveSC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: 02-26-06
Posts: 944
Likes: 0
From: Ontario Canada
nissan is great quality, i have a 99 altima just about to roll over 300000km with no such problems to the engine..

tranny on the other hand.. haha.. well lets just say it was a auto, and is now a maunal..
to clarify, this is my beater... have had it since new
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 06:27 AM
  #73  
scstang's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-20-06
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: whorehouse
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...d+vs+new&hl=en
watch the end of this vid. the 350z loses to the old 300zx and i dont think the 300zx tt was even in the 13s
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 12:42 PM
  #74  
MoMoney's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-11-07
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: OK
Originally Posted by scstang
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...d+vs+new&hl=en
watch the end of this vid. the 350z loses to the old 300zx and i dont think the 300zx tt was even in the 13s
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/show...1&postcount=71
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2007 | 09:40 PM
  #75  
scstang's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-20-06
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: whorehouse
you cant just trust these magazine times. they can be biased. they tested the 350 four times. three times they ran 14s then magicaly they run 13.7. you should find that issue of mt and count how many ad spaces nissan bought in that issue. if it is true the old 300zx tt can do 13.8-13.9 how did the 350 which should do 13.7 lose by 3 car lenghths. after the line the 300zx was still pulling on the 350. go to the local track sit down and watch. you will see the magazine times are majority bs.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:49 AM.