Vector Tuned 2.4 SS v. Stock SS/SC
Originally Posted by WSFrazier
I by no means consider myself a pro driver, maybe noit even a good one now that I got into that little fender bender today, but you can't really mess up from a roll. Just simply drop it and go. I will say the first run we did I should have been in 2nd and not 3rd. But instead of bashing me give George some congrats 
Sorry, it wasn't meant to be bashing
GTP is pretty quick in his 2.4.....He doesn't ever say he can beat an SS....but he doesn't fall too far back from a stock SS/SC, I dynoed at 243whp today, and last night we ran from a stop and I had a car pull out in front of me, so i had to swirve, and I had some trouble catching back up to him.....unless you see his car run first hand, you don't really understand.
The other thing to keep in mind with GTP is that he was smart when he ordered his car. No leather, no sub, no sunroof on top of the fact that the SS N/A is lighter than the SS/SC stock by just under 100lbs. He's shaved off a LOT of weight. The SS/SCs are beasts when it comes to weight. I would say SAFELY that GTP is at least 150lbs lighter than Wes's car. That doesn't make up for the entire difference, but it sure as hell helped.
The other thing to keep in mind with GTP is that he was smart when he ordered his car. No leather, no sub, no sunroof on top of the fact that the SS N/A is lighter than the SS/SC stock by just under 100lbs. He's shaved off a LOT of weight. The SS/SCs are beasts when it comes to weight. I would say SAFELY that GTP is at least 150lbs lighter than Wes's car. That doesn't make up for the entire difference, but it sure as hell helped.
Originally Posted by fastSS06
GTP is pretty quick in his 2.4.....He doesn't ever say he can beat an SS....but he doesn't fall too far back from a stock SS/SC, I dynoed at 243whp today, and last night we ran from a stop and I had a car pull out in front of me, so i had to swirve, and I had some trouble catching back up to him.....unless you see his car run first hand, you don't really understand.
The other thing to keep in mind with GTP is that he was smart when he ordered his car. No leather, no sub, no sunroof on top of the fact that the SS N/A is lighter than the SS/SC stock by just under 100lbs. He's shaved off a LOT of weight. The SS/SCs are beasts when it comes to weight. I would say SAFELY that GTP is at least 150lbs lighter than Wes's car. That doesn't make up for the entire difference, but it sure as hell helped.
The other thing to keep in mind with GTP is that he was smart when he ordered his car. No leather, no sub, no sunroof on top of the fact that the SS N/A is lighter than the SS/SC stock by just under 100lbs. He's shaved off a LOT of weight. The SS/SCs are beasts when it comes to weight. I would say SAFELY that GTP is at least 150lbs lighter than Wes's car. That doesn't make up for the entire difference, but it sure as hell helped.
With him being a sedan, I don't care if it has no options, he's not going to be that much lighter in my opinion. Your comparison of "catching back up to him" is a BS comparison. You could let a stock 2.2 jump and go, and it would be fairly hard to catch up to him too. The only comparison that would be accurate is at the track. Here's another thing to try-
have GTP drive WSFRAZIER'S car, and WSFRAZIER drive GTP's car and race. Then you'll see what I mean....
i know that the 2.4s are good cars...i had one before my ss/sc... it was stock except for an injen sri. those cars can pull pretty hard, but when i took my first ride in an ss/sc i was blown away by how much faster it was. don't get me wrong, the 2.4 is a quick car, but its gonna take a lot more than i/h/e/tune to beat an ss/sc. i can't see a 2.4 beating an ss/sc (with a good driver) unless he goes FI.... i just don't see it happening... maybe someone will prove me wrong though.... but after having both cars, the ss/sc is just too powerful
My best is a few tenths slower then what most s/c's run, so i know with a full header back and re-tune we will be right with them. And you really need to feel the difference between a stock 2.4 and a tuned 2.4, world of difference.
Originally Posted by Bad06SS
Sorry, but wsfrazier must not be able to drive worth a crap. I just looked at your guys's dyno sheets. First, WSfrazier dyno'd lower than almost every other stock S/C SS I've seen. Second, Wsfrazier had 41 more horsepower at the wheels, and 34 foot lbs more torque at the wheels than GTP. That's big difference! With you being a sedan, GTP, you aren't going to be lighter than him either. Good races, but I wouldn't go assuming that you can hang with all stock S/C SS's. You'll meet one that has a good driver one day and get your feelings hurt. Take care. 

Originally Posted by djt81185
neon sedans are lighter than neon coupes...
Originally Posted by 06G5GT
Friend of mine has a 96 Neon coupe 5 speed and a 98 Neon sedan auto. Both had no option. The coupe was almost 100lbs lighter on the scale.
which motors...the auto is 40lb more in itself. What was the gas levels? Wing? Drums or discs? that accounts for about 9 lb iirc
2 identically optioned cars will see the sedan about 50lb lighter with the same fluid levels.
Dan
Cars were identical base models with sohc & no wing and disc/drum brakes. Coupe was bought from another friend when headgasket blew. Coupe was weighed with 1/4 in the tank to get a baseline weight to see what stripping the interior would save. Anyway, it weighed about 2300lbs and he dropped the dohc from the Stratus in and was running mid 14s. Don't know what sedan was weighed with.
To resolve some of the theoretical issues on drivers, power differences etc.., I am going to take the car and get it weighted. It must be something. The fact is on roll ons etc, the modded 2.4 hangs in there REALLY well with the SS/SCs. We'll get some vids as well.
Originally Posted by Brandon97Z
With those i can definatly see us tuned 2.4's in the low low14's. My goal is to run a 13.99 1/4 or a 8.99 1/8th NA. I keep tryin to get my buddy in his S/C to run me cause he doesn't even believe i'll hang with him. Did you get any runs w/ the S/C from a dig?
Originally Posted by djt81185
which motors...the auto is 40lb more in itself. What was the gas levels? Wing? Drums or discs? that accounts for about 9 lb iirc
2 identically optioned cars will see the sedan about 50lb lighter with the same fluid levels.
Dan
2 identically optioned cars will see the sedan about 50lb lighter with the same fluid levels.
Dan
please dont take this the wrong way. im totally with you 2.4s and the whole "run what you brung" attitude. cobalts rock in all their forms
but i cant help shaking my head at a car dyno'ing in the 170's with mods "hanging" with a car that rolls off the factory with 205
again please dont flame because of my question.....i love all the balts, im not against 2.2 2.0 or 2.4,
but i find it very hard to believe that a car pushing 170. even giving a massive benefit of doubt and say even if your running 180, could hang with a SC purely on power.
*shrug* im not saying it physically didnt happen. but what i am saying, is that the numbers suggest that it shouldnt even be a race, and that the outcome was probably determined on other factors. (i hate to use the word "driver" because people freak thinking your saying the driver sucked)
again, please before you flame at me, im not trying to hate on the 2.2 or 2.4. but on first inspection it seems kinda funky.....
but i cant help shaking my head at a car dyno'ing in the 170's with mods "hanging" with a car that rolls off the factory with 205
again please dont flame because of my question.....i love all the balts, im not against 2.2 2.0 or 2.4,
but i find it very hard to believe that a car pushing 170. even giving a massive benefit of doubt and say even if your running 180, could hang with a SC purely on power.
*shrug* im not saying it physically didnt happen. but what i am saying, is that the numbers suggest that it shouldnt even be a race, and that the outcome was probably determined on other factors. (i hate to use the word "driver" because people freak thinking your saying the driver sucked)
again, please before you flame at me, im not trying to hate on the 2.2 or 2.4. but on first inspection it seems kinda funky.....
(exhale)...well you need to consider other factors besides just HORSEPOWER. Weight, gearing, rotation mass of tires and wheels etc. Look at my car spec's in the sig. Probably damn near 200-300lbs lighter than an SS/SC if not more. No sunroof, no leather, no system, no 18s.
It just a matter of continually thinking horsepower wins all races. It just simply doesn't. It helps but your physics argument needs to consider other things.
Also, why would a group of about 5-8 people just make up the story? Not because we need the publicity. Its a fact and its goig to get alot better as the 2.4s get tuned, and my car loses more weight with light weight rims, ZZ Perf header 3 inch catless downpipe, exhaust, stiffys...watch out it might go high 13s on DRs if I can launch at anything other than below 2000 rpms without wheel hop...
It just a matter of continually thinking horsepower wins all races. It just simply doesn't. It helps but your physics argument needs to consider other things.
Also, why would a group of about 5-8 people just make up the story? Not because we need the publicity. Its a fact and its goig to get alot better as the 2.4s get tuned, and my car loses more weight with light weight rims, ZZ Perf header 3 inch catless downpipe, exhaust, stiffys...watch out it might go high 13s on DRs if I can launch at anything other than below 2000 rpms without wheel hop...
Originally Posted by an0malous
please dont take this the wrong way. im totally with you 2.4s and the whole "run what you brung" attitude. cobalts rock in all their forms
but i cant help shaking my head at a car dyno'ing in the 170's with mods "hanging" with a car that rolls off the factory with 205
again please dont flame because of my question.....i love all the balts, im not against 2.2 2.0 or 2.4,
but i find it very hard to believe that a car pushing 170. even giving a massive benefit of doubt and say even if your running 180, could hang with a SC purely on power.
*shrug* im not saying it physically didnt happen. but what i am saying, is that the numbers suggest that it shouldnt even be a race, and that the outcome was probably determined on other factors. (i hate to use the word "driver" because people freak thinking your saying the driver sucked)
again, please before you flame at me, im not trying to hate on the 2.2 or 2.4. but on first inspection it seems kinda funky.....
but i cant help shaking my head at a car dyno'ing in the 170's with mods "hanging" with a car that rolls off the factory with 205
again please dont flame because of my question.....i love all the balts, im not against 2.2 2.0 or 2.4,
but i find it very hard to believe that a car pushing 170. even giving a massive benefit of doubt and say even if your running 180, could hang with a SC purely on power.
*shrug* im not saying it physically didnt happen. but what i am saying, is that the numbers suggest that it shouldnt even be a race, and that the outcome was probably determined on other factors. (i hate to use the word "driver" because people freak thinking your saying the driver sucked)
again, please before you flame at me, im not trying to hate on the 2.2 or 2.4. but on first inspection it seems kinda funky.....
GTP walks the walk, Iam a 18 year pro driver (rig) I have my suspicians that GTP is a very good driver. all the points he has made concernig weight etc all factors in the final result
Originally Posted by g5mike
GTP walks the walk, Iam a 18 year pro driver (rig) I have my suspicians that GTP is a very good driver. all the points he has made concernig weight etc all factors in the final result
Thanks Mike. If you happen to have a SCCA Racing Rule Book you might even find my name in the back.......


