08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion Discuss the 2008 - 2009 Chevy Cobalt SS Turbocharged. On sale since the second quarter of 2008.

LNF drivetrain loss #'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 03:11 PM
  #1  
SUKXOST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-06
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
From: Sumter, SC
LNF drivetrain loss #'s

REALLY I'm looking for modded % losses. DO modded LNF cars have less/more drivetrain loss than a stock LNF? Have not seen it an any threads.....(other than some stock dynos pulling around 230-236 WHP which equalls 9-11% loss)

Most FWD cars in general of roughly our HP/TQ #'s seem to lose 12-18%. AWD cars seem to be consistantly 25-30%. RWD I've seen is somewhere in between. Do these LNF engines or other parts of the drivetrain/tranny somehow reduce drivetrain loss??? 9-11% seems pretty good. I'm curious who's dyno'd modded LNF's and what kind of losses or gains they have seen. I know the answer is useless as the loss will be there no matter what, but I've been learning a lil more about DT loss and just lookin for some more answers. Learn me. :P
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 03:13 PM
  #2  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
how would someone determine the dt loss on a modded car, unless they tested crank hp and then compared that to whp. doubt anyone has done that.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 03:16 PM
  #3  
alleycat58's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-08-05
Posts: 18,529
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
If you could just get a % loss even on a stock LNF the percentage shouldn't change THAT much from stock to modded. Getting a modded loss % would involve someone modding the motor and pulling it out of the car, then hooking it back up to the chassis and dynoing again. I don't know that you'll find too many people on here with the resources for that.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 03:17 PM
  #4  
Psykostevo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-20-06
Posts: 6,910
Likes: 6
From: Phoenix, AZ
14% average. Calculated from baseline dynos pulls using the estimated 260bhp as the denominator.

It's 24.5% on the automatic LNFs like HHR, Solstice, Sky using the same method.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 03:19 PM
  #5  
slowswap's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-25-08
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
From: Depew, NY
A percentage is a percentage. The drivetrain total lose increases with amount of mods but the percent does not.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 03:20 PM
  #6  
krispy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-26-08
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 3
From: Somewhere, MI
Originally Posted by Psykostevo
It's 24.5% on the automatic LNFs like HHR, Solstice, Sky using the same method.
I highly doubt that number
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 03:25 PM
  #7  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by krispy
I highly doubt that number
i don't. the auto's run significantly slower than the manuals with the same mods.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 03:32 PM
  #8  
SUKXOST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-06
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
From: Sumter, SC
Originally Posted by slowswap
A percentage is a percentage. The drivetrain total lose increases with amount of mods but the percent does not.
Thats pertty much what I suspected... % staying the same....but it just SEEMS that more aggressive parts and or higher quality parts.....lighter parts etc would make a difference and maybe significantly in some cases.

So 14% average on the LNF's huh? Not too bad I guess. Sorry if that seems newB but ya gotta learn somehow. Here's how I got those #'s of 9-11%.
260 stock with most pulls I'VE seen on CSS.net getting 230-236 WHP:
Take 260 X .89 = 231+WHP. That's 11% loss
Take 260 X .91 = 236+WHP. That's 9% loss

As far as getting modded #'s vs stock I figured they would have had stock %'s first then having being modded they could easily calculate the new HP #'s to see the loss % vs stock.

I guess FWD>RWD>AWD in this case. YAY for us.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 03:33 PM
  #9  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by SUKXOST
Thats pertty much what I suspected... % staying the same....but it just SEEMS that more aggressive parts and or higher quality parts.....lighter parts etc would make a difference and maybe significantly in some cases.

So 14% average on the LNF's huh? Not too bad I guess. Sorry if that seems newB but ya gotta learn somehow. Here's how I got those #'s of 9-11%.
260 stock with most pulls I'VE seen on CSS.net getting 230-236 WHP:
Take 260 X .89 = 231+WHP. That's 11% loss
Take 260 X .91 = 236+WHP. That's 9% loss

As far as getting modded #'s vs stock I figured they would have had stock %'s first then having being modded they could easily calculate the new HP #'s to see the loss % vs stock.

I guess FWD>RWD>AWD in this case. YAY for us.
if traction was that way too we'd be golden
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 04:10 PM
  #10  
1WhiteSSTC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-23-08
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
if traction was that way too we'd be golden
lol
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 04:13 PM
  #11  
steddy2112's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-08-06
Posts: 25,520
Likes: 3
From: Newark DE
Originally Posted by krispy
I highly doubt that number


Yeah, and how many have you tuned/dynoed?
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 04:55 PM
  #12  
SUKXOST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-06
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
From: Sumter, SC
he's not answering...I think you make your point. :P jk
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 06:32 PM
  #13  
glhs379's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-30-08
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville FL.
24.5% would more likely be in the awd area
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 06:41 PM
  #14  
Psykostevo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-20-06
Posts: 6,910
Likes: 6
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by krispy
I highly doubt that number
It's true. Autos make 185-200whp and manuals make 225-245.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 07:17 PM
  #15  
krispy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-26-08
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 3
From: Somewhere, MI
Originally Posted by steddy2112


Yeah, and how many have you tuned/dynoed?
It just seems like an absurdly high drivetrain loss

Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
i don't. the auto's run significantly slower than the manuals with the same mods.
not always and autos w/ higher stall converters can complete w/ manuals

Last edited by krispy; Dec 9, 2008 at 07:17 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 07:20 PM
  #16  
SUKXOST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-06
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
From: Sumter, SC
Originally Posted by krispy
It just seems like an absurdly high drivetrain loss

HUH? Absurdly high? 225-245 WHP is between 6 and 13% loss at most. That's pretty minimal IMO! Auto is way more bc is a parasitic loss.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 07:31 PM
  #17  
krispy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-26-08
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 3
From: Somewhere, MI
Originally Posted by SUKXOST
HUH? Absurdly high? 225-245 WHP is between 6 and 13% loss at most. That's pretty minimal IMO! Auto is way more bc is a parasitic loss.
I was saying 25% loss on a FWD auto seems high.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 07:42 PM
  #18  
steddy2112's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-08-06
Posts: 25,520
Likes: 3
From: Newark DE
Originally Posted by krispy
It just seems like an absurdly high drivetrain loss
I watched an LE5 auto put down 142whp on the same dyno my LE5 manual put down 167whp (with a catback and a CAI)

I doubt catback and CAI is worth 25 whp.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 07:45 PM
  #19  
SUKXOST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-06
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
From: Sumter, SC
SO glad we're manual! Could you imagine buying an auto SS HHR advertised at 260/260 and getting 3/4 of what ur payin for???? Sucker born every minute. LOL
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 07:46 PM
  #20  
steddy2112's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-08-06
Posts: 25,520
Likes: 3
From: Newark DE
They are rated lower.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 07:49 PM
  #21  
SUKXOST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-06
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
From: Sumter, SC
Serious? What are they advertised at for HP?
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 07:54 PM
  #22  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
235/223
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
Zharrington_2010LNF
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
21
Feb 8, 2016 01:43 PM
Jesse
Parts
15
Oct 13, 2015 09:32 PM
patooyee
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
0
Oct 1, 2015 01:07 PM
Bohb
New Members Check In!!
3
Sep 27, 2015 09:11 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 AM.