smoked a stage 2 07 cobalt s/c
07-04-2009, 04:16 AM
#51
Member
Join Date: 04-16-09
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok.... and u cant use the fastest stg2 SC time to base against the stock TC... and its not crazy for him to beat him really... i mean, older car, probably on 2nd setof tires, may have went to something harder for mileage and is doing some roasting.... he has the sticky ass sport contacts that stick like glue, and its not like 2 lengths is some CRAZY ass beatdown... you guys act like hes saying he barely could see his headlights after the 60 ft mark..
07-04-2009, 04:34 AM
#52
New Member
Join Date: 10-27-08
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is very true as well... Thus remembering that bad tunes and drivers can also suck and throw the facts off... Just like you said.
Last edited by IamtheCobaltian; 07-04-2009 at 04:34 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
07-04-2009, 10:50 AM
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-27-07
Location: USA
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A stock SS/Turbo makes +10whp over a Stage 2 SC with no other mods.
I proved that:
"Stage 2 SC vs. SS/T dyno face off"
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-0l-lnf-performance-tech-153/images-video-todays-stage-2-sc-vs-ss-t-dyno-face-off-56k-think-again-118151/
So yes, an SS/T is a tick faster than a Stage 2 SC.
But just barely ... it's definitely a driver's race.
(BTW, I'm not dissing Balt SS/T's - they're great cars!)
I proved that:
"Stage 2 SC vs. SS/T dyno face off"
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-0l-lnf-performance-tech-153/images-video-todays-stage-2-sc-vs-ss-t-dyno-face-off-56k-think-again-118151/
So yes, an SS/T is a tick faster than a Stage 2 SC.
But just barely ... it's definitely a driver's race.
(BTW, I'm not dissing Balt SS/T's - they're great cars!)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NoBalt123
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
27
09-04-2015 07:10 AM