BNR turbo build
Push your turbo to 28psi and you should be close to 450hp. I bet i could be over 450hp on a dynojet with my old setup with 91 and water/meth at 28psi. I did have the bnr on my car and was pushing 28psi with 50/50 e85/91 but tuned for 4500ft. It felt a lot faster then the synapse kit.
you think that the bnr gt2871 with the stock cast mani makes better power than a garrett gt2871r with an equal length tubular?
Senior Member
Joined: 08-12-08
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: Huachuca city, AZ
i wanna raise it up to 28 and run more timing but im going to hold off until i get valve springs and pistons. also will prob wait until i get the zzp stage 1 trans because i dont really wana go through trannys like hotcakes.
you think that the bnr gt2871 with the stock cast mani makes better power than a garrett gt2871r with an equal length tubular?
you think that the bnr gt2871 with the stock cast mani makes better power than a garrett gt2871r with an equal length tubular?
I just tuned an 08 ss with stock internals, BNR turbo,exhaust and ZZP intercooler kit and dynoed @ 407HP and 391TQ, so it can be done, So you probably dyno more you have more goodies.
That is @ 26psi and 15 degrees of timing no meth and 93 octane.
That is @ 26psi and 15 degrees of timing no meth and 93 octane.
Last edited by creepySS; Mar 2, 2013 at 06:34 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Would like to see proof of that. Seems really high for pump gas and no adders.
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Joined: 04-12-09
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 16
From: Connecticut
I definitey agree. Especially seeing as how this is the same guy that just asked how to rescale maf calibrations on the hpt forum a couple weeks back. That's something you NEVER want to hear from a guy who's tuning your car.. lol.. Even if he posts a dyno sheet I'd be a tad reluctant to take it a face value considering how dyno numbers can be skewed to you're liking if you know how to do so. Just for ***** and giggles, I would be pretty curious to see it though.
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/video/embed?video_id=4487380258956" width="1280" height="720" frameborder="0"></iframe>
Last edited by creepySS; Mar 9, 2013 at 09:50 AM.
Last edited by creepySS; Mar 9, 2013 at 09:57 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Senior Member
Joined: 03-05-11
Posts: 2,570
Likes: 1
From: Encino,Ca
I definitey agree. Especially seeing as how this is the same guy that just asked how to rescale maf calibrations on the hpt forum a couple weeks back. That's something you NEVER want to hear from a guy who's tuning your car.. lol.. Even if he posts a dyno sheet I'd be a tad reluctant to take it a face value considering how dyno numbers can be skewed to you're liking if you know how to do so. Just for ***** and giggles, I would be pretty curious to see it though.
Senior Member
Joined: 09-04-09
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Joined: 04-12-09
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 16
From: Connecticut
lol.. you seriously think I don't realize this?
When one of us over there states that the maf needs to be calibrated, because it's clearly out of whack in the upper ranges if you take 2 seconds to look at the tune you posted, and your response to that is "On what table do i do this?" then yeah that's going to be a little scarey to say the least. Maf tuning is maf tuning regardless if you're doing it via afr error in open loop, or by trims in closed loop, it's the same basic idea just implimented a little differently. No one is bashing you for asking a questiion, however it is scarey if a "tuner" has to ask where to find a table for maf scaling. Sorry bud, I'm just callin it as I see it.
When one of us over there states that the maf needs to be calibrated, because it's clearly out of whack in the upper ranges if you take 2 seconds to look at the tune you posted, and your response to that is "On what table do i do this?" then yeah that's going to be a little scarey to say the least. Maf tuning is maf tuning regardless if you're doing it via afr error in open loop, or by trims in closed loop, it's the same basic idea just implimented a little differently. No one is bashing you for asking a questiion, however it is scarey if a "tuner" has to ask where to find a table for maf scaling. Sorry bud, I'm just callin it as I see it.
New Member
Joined: 03-06-09
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Joined: 04-12-09
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 16
From: Connecticut
yikes.. what happened in the mid-upper range there? Things sort of fell apart there for ya.
either way, 407whp on a bnr @ 26psi on 93 and no other fueling power adders = a happy dyno. I'm glad you're happy though..
either way, 407whp on a bnr @ 26psi on 93 and no other fueling power adders = a happy dyno. I'm glad you're happy though..
New Member
Joined: 03-06-09
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
And probably I should formulated my question and answers better, when i said what table I was refering to any regarding MAF fail freq, diagnostics changes, and the tune that i posted in hp tuners forums i wasnt done yet, thats why is called tunning the maf.
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Joined: 04-12-09
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 16
From: Connecticut
We had trouble with the spark plugs that night, but all the pulls after that are smooth.
And probably I should formulated my question and answers better, when i said what table I was refering to any regarding MAF fail freq, diagnostics changes, and the tune that i posted in hp tuners forums i wasnt done yet, thats why is called tunning the maf.
And probably I should formulated my question and answers better, when i said what table I was refering to any regarding MAF fail freq, diagnostics changes, and the tune that i posted in hp tuners forums i wasnt done yet, thats why is called tunning the maf.
Also, I call bs on spark blowout on a little 2871 with a .032-.033 gap.. just sayin
Forgot to add.. if the other graphs were so much smoother like you're saying, then where are they? Why post this graph if you have better and cleaner ones? Makes no sense to me.
Last edited by 09CobaltSS1; Mar 11, 2013 at 11:48 AM.
Clearly if wasn't a finished tune, hense it looking like crap and the scaling not being complete. My point was that it's scary you had to ask where to rescale the maf to begin with, and I certainly wasn't alone in feeling that. It's a pretty straight forward answer.
Also, I call bs on spark blowout on a little 2871 with a .032-.033 gap.. just sayin
Forgot to add.. if the other graphs were so much smoother like you're saying, then where are they? Why post this graph if you have better and cleaner ones? Makes no sense to me.
Also, I call bs on spark blowout on a little 2871 with a .032-.033 gap.. just sayin
Forgot to add.. if the other graphs were so much smoother like you're saying, then where are they? Why post this graph if you have better and cleaner ones? Makes no sense to me.
Second we posted that graph to show the HP made for proof.
How do you like that one?
Third lets get back on topic!
New Member
Joined: 03-06-09
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
.. LOK VIDEO