2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Direct bolt-on turbo (ko4 replacement)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-13-2012, 03:40 PM
  #251  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Wangspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-22-09
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 3,146
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by AARON-SS-TC
i was just sayin that for $2-2500, i better have a much faster car, and if not, then why spend the money....
i really dont wanna go over 25psi on any turbo i get, really just wanna stay at the 24psi i am at now currently on the stock turbo, and want 400whp/400wtq on 93 gas...
Comparing boost numbers is pointless.
Old 08-13-2012, 04:10 PM
  #252  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
AARON-SS-TC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-24-11
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
obviously these are vague things i am stating because of the ramp, torque management, timing and such, but thats why i have a thread on detailed tunes. this is on bolt-on turbos....hopefully that wr-2 is the real deal, because i will buy it before the end of the year...
Old 08-13-2012, 04:35 PM
  #253  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Chevycobaltss3's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-24-08
Location: Vine Grove Kentucky
Posts: 12,838
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lol, 26 spike 24 steady I made 399whp on 89/91 octane but this was a agrressive tune even with me knowing it was the two mix. 20g
Bnr will be roughly 350-370 most on 93 with lower boost and a correct tune for a dd
Frossb made 400+ on 24lbs on his 5557
Donkey ***** made 399 on his 6758 at the boost stated
When I'm done with the Zzp efr I'm tuning I'm sure he will dyno,
Brant (with his built block and head/cam combo was almost at 500whp on his 5857 on 23lbs on 93 octane (470ish whp)
There's more these are just my guys..
Old 08-13-2012, 04:38 PM
  #254  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Chevycobaltss3's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-24-08
Location: Vine Grove Kentucky
Posts: 12,838
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Also, the first efrs were blowing wheels left as right. And best turbo for a stock engine to obtain good numbers low boost are the efr, 25g (my spool was 4k) and 252/256 bullseye turbos for quick spool. This is what I think.
Old 08-13-2012, 04:55 PM
  #255  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
AARON-SS-TC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-24-11
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks james for the great info
Old 08-13-2012, 07:48 PM
  #256  
Senior Member
 
Fastgti69's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-05-11
Location: Encino,Ca
Posts: 2,582
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Chevycobaltss3
Lol, 26 spike 24 steady I made 399whp on 89/91 octane but this was a agrressive tune even with me knowing it was the two mix. 20g
Bnr will be roughly 350-370 most on 93 with lower boost and a correct tune for a dd
Frossb made 400+ on 24lbs on his 5557
Donkey ***** made 399 on his 6758 at the boost stated
When I'm done with the Zzp efr I'm tuning I'm sure he will dyno,
Brant (with his built block and head/cam combo was almost at 500whp on his 5857 on 23lbs on 93 octane (470ish whp)
There's more these are just my guys..
Definitely will dyno, and go to track for trap speeds.
Old 08-14-2012, 08:45 AM
  #257  
Senior Member
 
Sully20's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-03-11
Location: Pottstown, PA
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chevycobaltss3
Also, the first efrs were blowing wheels left as right. And best turbo for a stock engine to obtain good numbers low boost are the efr, 25g (my spool was 4k) and 252/256 bullseye turbos for quick spool. This is what I think.
Hey James, Thanks for taking my call the other day lol, If I'm looking for Stock Spool and a goal of 400WHP which turbo would you recommend the 252et, 256et or the EFR?
Old 08-14-2012, 09:09 AM
  #258  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
AARON-SS-TC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-24-11
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
zzp zfr, or pwerks wr-2^^^^^ thats what im looking at
Old 08-14-2012, 09:12 AM
  #259  
Senior Member
 
Sully20's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-03-11
Location: Pottstown, PA
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmm, P Works Wr-2 Huh? I'll have to look into that one, I dont know much about P Works....Its supposed to have close to stock spool?
Old 08-14-2012, 09:33 AM
  #260  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
AARON-SS-TC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-24-11
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes, the zzp may be rated at up to 500whp and the wr-2 is rated at 450whp max...Performance autowerks wr-2 is probably gonna be the cheapest route and true bolt-on....without E47/E85, the wr-2 seems to be around the 415whp and 400wtq on 93 with stock spool...
Old 08-14-2012, 09:38 AM
  #261  
Senior Member
 
JBThrasher22's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-19-10
Location: Meridian
Posts: 523
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AARON-SS-TC
yes, the zzp may be rated at up to 500whp and the wr-2 is rated at 450whp max...Performance autowerks wr-2 is probably gonna be the cheapest route and true bolt-on....
If the EFR was released it would actually be the same price point as you can buy the exhaust casting from zzp for 499 and the turbo itself is around $1500. So the price point of 2k is which both turbos will be at.

The P Werks is a modified "stock" k04 that looks to be bored and honed with bigger billet wheels. Basically a k04 + upgrade or how it should have been originally. You will be on max efficiency or maybe slightly out of efficiency to reach 400 whp with something like that I would imagine, where the EFR will be with in its efficiency range. But that is my opinion on the subject.
Old 08-14-2012, 10:52 AM
  #262  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Chevycobaltss3's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-24-08
Location: Vine Grove Kentucky
Posts: 12,838
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The 6758 isn't rated at 500whp it's rated at 450chp so in order to hit more it requires to be out of efficiency and other adders.
Old 08-14-2012, 11:56 AM
  #263  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
AARON-SS-TC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-24-11
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah, i see what you guys are sayin.
Even though the bolt-on turbos can hit 400whp, they are maxed out rather than being in the cooler, efficient levels of a different turbo.
Old 08-14-2012, 07:06 PM
  #264  
Senior Member
 
40rty's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-11-08
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,889
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by AARON-SS-TC
yes, the zzp may be rated at up to 500whp and the wr-2 is rated at 450whp max...Performance autowerks wr-2 is probably gonna be the cheapest route and true bolt-on....without E47/E85, the wr-2 seems to be around the 415whp and 400wtq on 93 with stock spool...
where did you get those numbers?????
Old 08-14-2012, 08:19 PM
  #265  
Senior Member
 
alerosaint's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-06-08
Location: Federal Way
Posts: 3,414
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by AARON-SS-TC
yeah, i see what you guys are sayin.
Even though the bolt-on turbos can hit 400whp, they are maxed out rather than being in the cooler, efficient levels of a different turbo.
And thats what im looking for personally. A turbo that bolts n with the least amount of change to the engine(ie BOV etc) that can push ~400/400 with out breaking a sweat. That way it will be in its effieciency range. tune wont be aggressive and the turbo "should" last longer since its not being taxed. I know the efr is capable of more but thats all i need out of it. It fits my need all to well
Old 08-14-2012, 09:22 PM
  #266  
Senior Member
 
SSlobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-22-09
Location: Kathmandu
Posts: 5,989
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Wangspeed
Stop your crazy talk :P You can make 360 whp on the stock turbo! It'll last pull after pull after pull too.

There are way too many idiots that think 360 hp on the stock turbo is anything like 360 on a bigger turbo. Likewise too many people on this forum do not understand that bigger turbos mean the torque curve will come on later which means you will never get peak toque numbers like a tiny turbo.
Blashpheming!!!
Old 08-14-2012, 09:26 PM
  #267  
Senior Member
 
Fastgti69's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-05-11
Location: Encino,Ca
Posts: 2,582
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
With the way the EFR spools, I wouldn't mind have gone 1 step bigger. Just my opinion, but then again. I'm still in the process of tuning, I don't think I'm close to being done yet. James can attest to that.
Old 08-14-2012, 09:55 PM
  #268  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Chevycobaltss3's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-24-08
Location: Vine Grove Kentucky
Posts: 12,838
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i need more logs lol (two so far) poopy!!!
Old 08-14-2012, 10:21 PM
  #269  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
AARON-SS-TC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-24-11
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 40rty
where did you get those numbers?????
really???
From you and others on here, and the companys' website...common' man...lol

The Home of WERKSracing products!
Old 08-14-2012, 10:29 PM
  #270  
Senior Member
 
Fastgti69's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-05-11
Location: Encino,Ca
Posts: 2,582
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Chevycobaltss3
i need more logs lol (two so far) poopy!!!
I know man, past two days at work have been hectic. I get home late and tired while its still too hot to log. I have to stay awake till midnight to log haha. Tonight for sure though, no excuses. I got off early
Old 08-14-2012, 10:47 PM
  #271  
Senior Member
 
40rty's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-11-08
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,889
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by AARON-SS-TC
really???
From you and others on here, and the companys' website...common' man...lol

The Home of WERKSracing products!
what i posted was 390whp 410trq
Old 08-14-2012, 10:49 PM
  #272  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
AARON-SS-TC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-24-11
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah, on a solstice/sky redline..thats why i said 400whp+ for us cobalt guys because we have less powertrain loss...
Old 08-14-2012, 10:55 PM
  #273  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Frogstofall's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-30-11
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AARON-SS-TC
yeah, on a solstice/sky redline..thats why i said 400whp+ for us cobalt guys because we have less powertrain loss...
Really shouldn't assume or post numbers until we have hard evidence. Its misleading.
Old 08-14-2012, 10:58 PM
  #274  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Chevycobaltss3's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-24-08
Location: Vine Grove Kentucky
Posts: 12,838
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lol. Numbers depend on dyno. I can go to a dyno and make 400whp on this dynojet. And then go to a dynojet a hour away and make 430whp same conditions. There are high reading dynoes and low reading ones.
Old 08-14-2012, 10:59 PM
  #275  
Senior Member
 
40rty's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-11-08
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,889
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
you guys are about 6-7% less powertrain loss so that's roughly about 30whp or less. Nobody has tried it though.


Quick Reply: Direct bolt-on turbo (ko4 replacement)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:14 AM.